Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 05 Apr 2007 (Thursday) 21:43
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "What do you think of the antique treatment?"
Looks great! keep it for sure.
1
3.2%
Looks horrible and I would never want to claim it!
14
45.2%
Looks OK but needs a tweak.
5
16.1%
Looks OK but seems far overdone.
11
35.5%

31 voters, 31 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does this treatment ruin the picture?

 
MikeMcL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Apr 05, 2007 21:43 |  #1

Here is a prego shot I did a while back. I am trying to add variety to her shots (she wants most of them PLAIN) but i wanted to do one or two antiqued pics for her.

What do you think about the treatment on this pic? please feel free to have a go at it if you have an idea for an effect.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Apr 05, 2007 21:48 |  #2

The original is more pleasing to my eye. Although the pose is very dated too. Hope this helps :D


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
embdaw
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: MI
     
Apr 05, 2007 21:49 |  #3

I dont really care for the conversion, I think it makes her look Jaundiced...:lol: I vote for the orig!


~*~Erin~*~
5DMKII|5D|7D|16-35Lmk1|24-70L|35L|50L|100L|70-200L 2.8IS|580EXII x3
Aperture + CS5 on a MAC
My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Apr 05, 2007 21:51 |  #4

Looks like your answer is sorting itself out. The original is OK.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeMcL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Apr 05, 2007 22:03 |  #5

thanks for the quick responses. I am giving her the original as well as the artsy one. I just feel like many of the poses are too similar, so I like to throw curve balls in there. If I loved it, i would have never asked. I am not sure, so i need the help lol.


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Detrimental
Senior Member
303 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Florida, USA
     
Apr 05, 2007 22:07 |  #6

Stick to the original, the treatment ruins the picture for me.


5D Mark II w/grip
85L f/1.2 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Apr 05, 2007 22:09 |  #7

I like the original myself...Have you tried it in B/W or Sepia?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
embdaw
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: MI
     
Apr 05, 2007 22:09 |  #8

Here is my quick play

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

~*~Erin~*~
5DMKII|5D|7D|16-35Lmk1|24-70L|35L|50L|100L|70-200L 2.8IS|580EXII x3
Aperture + CS5 on a MAC
My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeMcL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Apr 06, 2007 01:54 |  #9

Thankx for the participation.

-Erin, I like that version, and did something like that to a few of this lady's pictures. I just didnt want to overload her with too many of one type.


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fensterbme
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Columbus OH
     
Apr 06, 2007 08:35 |  #10

I also vote for the original, I like a lot of different treatments but this isn't working for me...


My Gear: Doesn't Matter, but I have more than my fair share of it.
My Web Site:
http://www.fenstermach​er-photo.com/ (external link)
My flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/fensterbme/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Apr 06, 2007 08:49 |  #11

I've recently seen some soft pastel conversions that would probably be more suitable for this type shot. I think your conversion might be a bit too hard/dark for the a happy/bright time in her life. Check out some of the free actions here: http://www.pbase.com/p​hotofixer/image/363544​84 (external link)


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Attic
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,371 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Rural Hampshire
     
Apr 06, 2007 09:10 |  #12

I like the original best also but had a go a an antique version for you.


Alby

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,617 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Does this treatment ruin the picture?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1317 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.