Lowepro vertex 100 aw VS mini trekker aw

The new vertex series looks interesting.
I wonder what can hold more, then 100 aw or my mini trekker.
The mini trekker seems to be a tight fit, but I think in my future it can probably hold most or all of my lenses.
However, the mini trekker is hard to use for tripod, not that comfertable for me, and I have no place for food or anything (not sure if the vertex offers this.)
The 200 aw seems kind of extra large and heavy, not sure if I need that weight either.

I have a mini trekker aw and it holds all my lenses/flash etc. The pocket on the outside will hold some decent sized accessories like food but not a ton.

Currently I have it holding my 20D/grip usually with the 24mm 1.4l attached, 10-22mm canon, 70-200 2.8L (non IS), 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Lensbaby 2.0,550EX flash and probably my 17-40L (which is in the shop). The bag is essentially full with that setup, but my 17-40L has been in the shop since before I got it and I have since added the 10-22 to my lineup. Soooo it looks like there is just enough room for the 17-40L also but we shall see.

efroten wrote in post #3018589
I have a mini trekker aw and it holds all my lenses/flash etc. The pocket on the outside will hold some decent sized accessories like food but not a ton.

Currently I have it holding my 20D/grip usually with the 24mm 1.4l attached, 10-22mm canon, 70-200 2.8L (non IS), 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Lensbaby 2.0,550EX flash and probably my 17-40L (which is in the shop). The bag is essentially full with that setup, but my 17-40L has been in the shop since before I got it and I have since added the 10-22 to my lineup. Soooo it looks like there is just enough room for the 17-40L also but we shall see.

I have mini trekker myself, however I do not really like it.