Lightroom or Bridge?

Roy Mathers wrote in post #3021659
Thanks Rick and Tom - it works. (The delay in replying was caused by the time difference over here ie I was asleep!)

Gregp - surely you still need PSCS for retouching etc?

Lightroom was made in the idea for giving a photographer the tools. Photoshop has those tools, but so much else. This is a way Adobe can capture the full market, for the photogs that don't want to pay for the full photoshop package. Obviously, nothing will ever beat the options and tools that Photoshop offers, but not everyone needs it.

Roy Mathers wrote in post #3021659
Thanks Rick and Tom - it works.

Glad to be of help

Ok, so how to set up LR to work with CS2 while wanting to print with ARGB as a default. What i get in LR and what is printed at the moment looks dull and dark,, - ideas please!
Thanks
Mark

I've tried lightroom twice and each time it seemed slow and clunky as hell compared to using bridge/ps.

Coastwatch203 wrote in post #3376355
Ok, so how to set up LR to work with CS2 while wanting to print with ARGB as a default. What i get in LR and what is printed at the moment looks dull and dark,, - ideas please!
Thanks
Mark

Have a read on color management, soft proofing, and most imporant, printer profiles: Click the link in my sig.

Search will probabely also find a few related threads..

I always use PS for printing.