Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Apr 2004 (Monday) 17:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why doesn't 4x6 = 4x6

 
Gibmeister
Member
131 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 19, 2004 17:46 |  #1

I have a Canon S9000 printer and I use Photoshop 7 to size my photos for printing. I use the crop tool set at 4x6 at 300dpi, but when I go to print and tell the printer to do borderless prints on Canon 4x6 "Photo Paper Plus Glossy" paper I am told that the document will slightly extend off the paper. Portions of the photo are cut off in the process. Has anyone experience this and is there a way to get the whole print to come out. I tried the "fit to page" setting and that did not help. Thanks

Gib




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 19, 2004 18:11 |  #2

I've had the samething happen but couldn't figure out how to fix it (other than printing 4x6 on 5x7 paper).


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Guillermo ­ Freige
Senior Member
Avatar
704 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: La Plata, Argentina
     
Apr 19, 2004 19:11 |  #3

My epson photo 820 has the same problem. I must use something like a 3.8x5.7 size for an actual 4x6 borderless picture, but if I use the Epson 777 (no borderless option here), the 4x6 size works just fine. I'm using PS CS


Guillermo
EOS 5D MkII, 40D and 20D owner.
EF 17-40L, 24-105L IS , 70-300 IS, 24 f2.8, 35 f2, 50 f2.5 Macro, 85 f1.8.
EF-s 18-55 IS. Sigma 12-24, Tamron 17-50 Di II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dicky109
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2003
Location: SC & NJ USA
     
Apr 19, 2004 23:14 |  #4

Don't know if this will apply in your situations, however, I had this problem when I first started using my Epson 1280, but realized that I was choosing borderless on 4 x 6 paper with perforated edges. Since the paper is actually larger than 4 x 6, if you choose borderless, it creates a sizing problem. I unchecked the "borderless" option, & it printed the full size.
Alternatively, the easiest solution is to buy the "no perforation" paper and then print borderless.


Rich B
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt"--Bertrand Russell

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gibmeister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
131 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 20, 2004 04:15 |  #5

Thanks, I am using the "no perforation" Canon paper. I might try the suggestion to resize the photo to a smaller than 4x6 size, but it seems I shouldn't have to do that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dtrayers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,063 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Denmark Township, MN, USA
     
Apr 20, 2004 06:20 |  #6

I have a Canon S820 (similar to the S9000) and I print 4x6 without any issues.

I crop to a 4x6 size. I don't specify the resolution, it usually results to well over 240 ppi. I select the paper size to 4x6 in the printer and set the bleed to the third tick in the printer settings.

Here's a screen shot of my printer setup:

IMAGE: http://home.comcast.net/~dtrayers/photos/4x6.jpg

You can control the amount of bleed by the extension control.

I print on Epson Premium 4x6 paper.

-Dave

http://www.trayersphot​ography.com (external link)

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gibmeister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
131 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 20, 2004 07:34 |  #7

Thanks Dave I will give this a try when I get home from work and report back with my results.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gibmeister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
131 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 25, 2004 09:33 |  #8

Thanks for the suggestions. The one that worked the best for me is to size the pictures at 3.88" by 5.85". I have not fine tuned it yet but this seems to work pretty good.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,716 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Why doesn't 4x6 = 4x6
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1742 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.