Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 12 Apr 2007 (Thursday) 18:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Controlling DoF with available light

 
Digitalwave
Senior Member
Avatar
806 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
     
Apr 12, 2007 18:08 |  #1

Lets say you are shooting the ceremony with no flash allowed, and you are using focal lengths between 50 and 100mm (+ crop factor). Shooting wide open seems like the first choice so you can keep the ISO down in the available light, but you will probably not have enough DoF for the bride and groom. What aperture, approximately (I know different situations call for different measures) would you use in this situation? f/4? f/5.6? f/8?

The wedding I am shooting next month has a bride that is obsessed with bokeh, so I know I'll be shooting at f/2.8 and below a lot, but of course during situations like the ceremony I don't think she'd be too happy with bokeh if it included her husband's face!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmahoney
Goldmember
Avatar
2,789 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 12, 2007 18:41 |  #2

Your DOF will depend on aperture, focal length, and subject (focus) distance .. there are many online DOF caculators to help you there.

Hard to answer your question as a 100mm lens focussed at 5 meters at F4 will have a different DOF (and bokeh) than the same 100mm lens with the same aperture focused at 2 meters. The former would be more of a full shot where the latter would be more of a head shot.

So much depends on what you're shooting and how far away you are from what you're shooting. The answer will be different every time.
Mike


Newfoundland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digitalwave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
806 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
     
Apr 12, 2007 19:03 |  #3

I do understand how DoF works. I guess with so many variables my question is indeed very hard to answer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
*Mike*
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 12, 2007 21:25 |  #4

As with anything, it's a tradeoff. You have to decide on a case by case basis what you want to do... It ends up being a compromise between bumping the ISO, shooting wider (with the option to drop), and stopping down. I love shooting available light, and rarely find it to be a problem.


Belle's Photography (external link)* Belle's Blog (external link) * Belle's MySpace (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Banbert
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
     
Apr 13, 2007 03:42 as a reply to  @ *Mike*'s post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

This is one of these things that I have tried to build up a "feel for" by fiddling with the online DOF calculators (you can also buy DOF charts, DEPSSI) and its probably something that an experienced pro just knows from years of experience that at certain distances and focal lengths he needs a certain aperture to get the DOF he wants.

You could always use the DOF preview button as your setting the shot up of course, although I always think its quite hard to see exactly what your getting with that but again if you use it a lot when practicing it can help you build up a feel for what you need for certain shots.


Warwickshire Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | My wedding Photography Videos (external link)
Warwickshire Wedding Info (external link) | My Apple Magic Blog (external link)
30D x 3 + grips / EF-S 10-22mm / EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS /EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS / EF 100mm Macro / Sigma 30mm F1.4 / 580EX / 430EX / 33GB CF Cards / 2 PC'S + laptop / CS2 / HP 1220C / Canon CP-710 / Graphire4 Classic XL Manfroto Tripod & Joystick Head / Mac Book Pro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digitalwave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
806 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
     
Apr 13, 2007 08:16 as a reply to  @ Banbert's post |  #6

Thanks for the input guys. I'm going to be honest and say I've almost never used the DoF preview button, just because I always forget its there. I know it can be tricky to use but it might be helpful in the right situation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
Avatar
2,167 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
     
Apr 13, 2007 09:06 as a reply to  @ Digitalwave's post |  #7

If they are in the same plane you can get away with f/2 like this:

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

Or even if they aren't but close enough (again at f/2):

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

These clients were Bokeh junkies too.

EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 300/2.8 IS III | 400/2.8 IS III | 500/4 IS III | 600/4 IS III | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 11-24/4 | 16-35/2.8 III | 24-70/2.8 II | 70-200/2.8 IS III | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS II | 200-400/4 IS 1.4x
Sundry: 430EX III-RT | 600EX II-RT | 1.4x III | 2x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Apr 13, 2007 09:09 |  #8

In a church where there is no flash allowed I usually need ISO 3200 but STILL a very wide aperture. I am trying to not go wider than 2.8 but sometimes even need 1.8.

I make sure I focus on the important.. the couple. If you need the light, you need the light so not much else you can do.


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
motogeno
Senior Member
Avatar
317 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
     
Apr 13, 2007 16:22 as a reply to  @ song4themoon's post |  #9

I shot at 1.2 on my 85 at the last wedding for a lot of shots and the pictures were totally usable (don't have it to show at the moment) -- just make sure that they are in the same plain and you are far back, as the closer you get the shallower your depth of field will be. And it can be nice to have just the bride or groom in focus for some shots, especially if you are off to the side and your getting the back of someone's head anyway. It will put more emphasis on your subject, especially if he/she is crying or something!


www.chrisgenovese.com (external link)
4 30D's with battery grip, 1 Rebel XT with battery grip, 2 580ex's with Battery Packs, ST-E2 ETTL Transmitter, 85mm 1.2L, 50mm 1.2L, 16-35 2.8L, 24-70mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L, 16mm 2.8 Fisheye, 17 - 40 4.0L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digitalwave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
806 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
     
Apr 13, 2007 16:26 |  #10

motogeno wrote in post #3036440 (external link)
And it can be nice to have just the bride or groom in focus for some shots, especially if you are off to the side and your getting the back of someone's head anyway. It will put more emphasis on your subject, especially if he/she is crying or something!


For sure! But what I don't want, at least in most shots, is only one of them in focus and the other one just a bit fuzzy & soft.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ V
Goldmember
1,977 posts
Likes: 75
Joined Jan 2005
Location: S Yorks UK
     
Apr 14, 2007 04:01 |  #11

Digitalwave wrote in post #3036461 (external link)
For sure! But what I don't want, at least in most shots, is only one of them in focus and the other one just a bit fuzzy & soft.

Just make sure that you can get the shot to look like you meant it. You either get them in a similar plane so they'll both be in focus OR shoot from the side and take advantage of the narrow DoF by concentrating on an expression on 1 face. There's not a magic formula, you will have to use some judgement.


Gear List
website: South Yorkshire Wedding photographer in Doncaster (external link)
Twitter (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,625 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Controlling DoF with available light
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1044 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.