Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Apr 2007 (Sunday) 18:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lightroom "Auto Tone" Issue

 
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Apr 15, 2007 18:35 |  #1

Sorry if this has already been covered somewhere here...I couldn't find anything related.

I'm starting to play around with Lightroom, learning how things work and have found that the "Auto Tone" function, both in the Library and Develop, pushes the brightness up considerably of the image (squishes the histogram much to the right), so much so that it looks blown out. I assume it works this way for everyone else? Fruitlessly I looked for something that might "calibrate" the Auto feature.
I'm not sure how much I'll ever use the Auto Tone function, but to me it should work in a similiar manner as the Auto functions in CS2 and produce a more balanced appearing image. I'm not simply missing something, am I?


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jaime
Goldmember
Avatar
2,464 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
     
Apr 15, 2007 18:50 |  #2

I used it today for the first time and it seemed to work for me as you see CS2 functions work.


"My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
longs to capture through the sensual art of photography."
Jaime E. Pagán
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=6253713#p​ost6253713

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Apr 15, 2007 19:54 as a reply to  @ Jaime's post |  #3

I found this in an Adobe forum http://www.adobeforums​.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc338c4 (external link) .
I guess it's a common problem.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jestergx4
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Ventura County, CA
     
Apr 16, 2007 01:27 |  #4

I seem to be experiencing the same issue as well. I guess, we'll just have to wait for 1.1 release then? LoL



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Apr 16, 2007 01:31 |  #5

Yup, it does the same for me... and it seems to be a common issue.


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sochigetto
Member
34 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Jun 02, 2007 01:54 |  #6

Hola - my auto makes it go darker. andy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Victoria ­ Bampton
Goldmember
Avatar
1,367 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2007
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Jun 02, 2007 02:28 |  #7

Just like anything automated, there are certain bits it does really well, and others it does pretty badly. The settings it comes up with are basically the same as the old ACR settings.

For a start, it works far better on raw files than it does jpegs. And the black point auto is usually spot-on, but the overall exposure is largely dependent on the picture contents, as it's having to do everything mathematically (find the x % of the lightest area, and make it white, average the rest out to make it grey etc).

Workaround: If you find there's one slider you always change by the certain amount, remember it!

I have 2 presets I run on all the images. Auto Colour I run first - setting everything to their automatic settings. Then I run my second preset, which sets certain sliders (exposure, brightness, fill light etc) back to a default setting. If you general exposures are fairly consistent, it seems to be the best way of making use of the auto settings.


Victoria :D
Lightroom Queen website (external link)
Free & Comprehensive Lightroom Books (external link)
Free List of Lightroom Keyboard Shortcuts (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickSim87
Sir Chimp-a-lot
3,602 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: SE, Michigan
     
Sep 20, 2007 17:38 |  #8

Odd, with Lightroom 1.1 it worked fine, now with 1.2 I am having this problem. With JPEG's it leaves all the settings at zero, but bumps up the brightness to +50 to +65.

That's all it will do, go crazy with the brightness.

Anybody else have this problem?


Gear List | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 30, 2007 09:28 as a reply to  @ NickSim87's post |  #9

Wondering if anybody has come up with a solution for this...trying to figure out why my photos are at least a stop under in LR vs. other viewers....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 30, 2007 09:48 |  #10

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4218002 (external link)
Wondering if anybody has come up with a solution for this...trying to figure out why my photos are at least a stop under in LR vs. other viewers....

I run a preset on Import that seems to work just fine.

Open a pic in the develope module.
Set the desired settings you wish to use as "default".
Save those settings as a new prest.
Apply that preset on Import.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 30, 2007 10:38 |  #11

In2Photos wrote in post #4218133 (external link)
I run a preset on Import that seems to work just fine.

Open a pic in the develope module.
Set the desired settings you wish to use as "default".
Save those settings as a new prest.
Apply that preset on Import.

Gotcha, and that certainly makes sense.

Let me start with a "thanks" because I've read a lot of your posts the last couple of days trying to figure this all out and they've been very helpful.

I guess I'm still sort of "stuck" in that I can view a jpg in Irfanview and it's properly exposed, look at the same image in lightroom and it's underexposed, and export from lightroom (using any of the 3 color spaces) open up in Irfanview and it's (again) properly exposed. It's seems clear to me that lightroom isn't necessarily "doing" anything in that process, but the shots still look under. When in lightroom, the autotone feature cranks the brightness up to anywhere between 40 and 75 to "correct" an exposure that's correct in every other app I've tried.

Is the difference I'm seeing just the difference between a color managed app and a non color managed app? Does this apply to exposure as well??? The colors are a bit different between the two, with LR producing a warmer cast...but the actual exposure values just seem too different to explain.

Thanks again.... :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 30, 2007 12:56 |  #12

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4218446 (external link)
Gotcha, and that certainly makes sense.

Let me start with a "thanks" because I've read a lot of your posts the last couple of days trying to figure this all out and they've been very helpful.

I guess I'm still sort of "stuck" in that I can view a jpg in Irfanview and it's properly exposed, look at the same image in lightroom and it's underexposed, and export from lightroom (using any of the 3 color spaces) open up in Irfanview and it's (again) properly exposed. It's seems clear to me that lightroom isn't necessarily "doing" anything in that process, but the shots still look under. When in lightroom, the autotone feature cranks the brightness up to anywhere between 40 and 75 to "correct" an exposure that's correct in every other app I've tried.

First, is your monitor calibrated? Does Irfanview use a dark background when displaying your photos? There are lots of people that have mentioned their omages look darker or brighter in LR that other apps and often times it comes down to background color. When I import a jpeg now everything is zero'd and I start from there. That is my "Import Starting Point" from which I then edit my images.

Is the difference I'm seeing just the difference between a color managed app and a non color managed app? Does this apply to exposure as well??? The colors are a bit different between the two, with LR producing a warmer cast...but the actual exposure values just seem too different to explain.

Thanks again.... :)

Color managed apps vs non-color managed apps should not affect brightness (luminosity), only colors. If you are not aware LR uses Prophoto RGB as its color space so you have to be careful when you go outside of LR to work on an image. The colorspace will default to ProPhoto RGB during Export and by right-clicking and sending the image to an external editor. You can change this if you are sending it to a non-color managed app.

If you could post a screen shot of an image in LR next to the same image in Irfanview.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 30, 2007 18:27 |  #13

In2Photos wrote in post #4219180 (external link)
First, is your monitor calibrated? Does Irfanview use a dark background when displaying your photos? There are lots of people that have mentioned their omages look darker or brighter in LR that other apps and often times it comes down to background color. When I import a jpeg now everything is zero'd and I start from there. That is my "Import Starting Point" from which I then edit my images.

No and no, which I understand could be part of the problem. All the settings that I have are zero'd out as well, unless there's something that's more "hidden" that I'm totally missing .

Color managed apps vs non-color managed apps should not affect brightness (luminosity), only colors. If you are not aware LR uses Prophoto RGB as its color space so you have to be careful when you go outside of LR to work on an image. The colorspace will default to ProPhoto RGB during Export and by right-clicking and sending the image to an external editor. You can change this if you are sending it to a non-color managed app.

If you could post a screen shot of an image in LR next to the same image in Irfanview.

I exported 3 files, first sRGB, then Adobe RGB and ProPhoto RGB...All exhibited the expected differences in color but none exhibited the same type of exposure issue I'm referring to. I've got a couple of screen shots below.

First from LR:

IMAGE: http://www.wideopenwest.com/~sgasiorek/LR1.jpg

Now from Irfranview:

IMAGE: http://www.wideopenwest.com/~sgasiorek/iview1.jpg

To me, this looks like more than just a color issue...as I mentioned I tried all 3 colorspaces on exporting and none of them looked like what I'm seeing in LR. LR bumping the brightness feature is also a bit peculiar. I can post some crops if you'd like too....

Thanks. :)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 31, 2007 03:04 |  #14

Lemme guess: Irfanview uses the 'As shot' WB, and LR uses a preset. Or is this the converted file in both cases?

If so, and this is the sRGB image, something is quite a bit off.


AFAIK IrfanView isn't colormanaged (but I might be wrong there; been a while since I looked into it)

Okay; I checked & appear to be wrong: IrfanView 4.10: Support for embedded color profiles in JPG/TIF (Properties->Viewing).
Not sure what that means for a CR2. It might be ColorManaged, since (if?) it uses the embedded jpg.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 07:00 |  #15

René Damkot wrote in post #4223765 (external link)
Lemme guess: Irfanview uses the 'As shot' WB, and LR uses a preset. Or is this the converted file in both cases?

Not converted files, rather this is how they appear in their respective viewers. Irfanview should be using the "as shot" WB and Lightroom is set the same. When I convert the file out of LR (using any of the 3 color spaces) and open using Irfanview, the image looks fine (not under exposed like in the example above).

If so, and this is the sRGB image, something is quite a bit off.

Then I'm not going crazy! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,787 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Lightroom "Auto Tone" Issue
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1261 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.