Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Apr 2007 (Sunday) 18:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lightroom "Auto Tone" Issue

 
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:18 as a reply to  @ post 4224320 |  #16

Wow, that is interesting. The only thing that I can think of is that Irfanview is using a different monitor profile than LR or Irfanview is doing some type of Auto function itself and brightening the photo. Can you email me the JPEG?


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:31 |  #17

If you are viewing the Raw files in both apps, they are bound to look different... LR uses a certain 'default' for a camera that has *no relation whatsoever* to the 'in camera' settings. (Since it can't read them; they are Canon proprietory).
Only the WB setting is used (and pretty loosely at that).

I suspect IrfanView will do it different (I'm guessing it uses the built in jpg preview), and another raw converter will be different yet again.

In the above example, IMO exposure didn't change. WB and contrast did. I'd expect that to be the LR 'defaults' at work.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:33 |  #18

René Damkot wrote in post #4224855 (external link)
If you are viewing the Raw files in both apps, they are bound to look different... LR uses a certain 'default' for a camera that has *no relation whatsoever* to the 'in camera' settings. (Since it can't read them; they are Canon proprietory).
Only the WB setting is used (and pretty loosely at that).

I suspect IrfanView will do it different (I'm guessing it uses the built in jpg preview), and another raw converter will be different yet again.

In the above example, IMO exposure didn't change. WB and contrast did.

I agree except that he mentioned he tried exporting the images from LR and got the same result. So if LR is altering the file it should show up on the exported version as well as in LR.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:42 |  #19

In2Photos wrote in post #4224867 (external link)
I agree except that he mentioned he tried exporting the images from LR and got the same result.

That's what I thought at first, but this quote says otherwise (I think)

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4224320 (external link)
Not converted files, rather this is how they appear in their respective viewers. <...> When I convert the file out of LR (using any of the 3 color spaces) and open using Irfanview, the image looks fine (not under exposed like in the example above).


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:50 |  #20

René Damkot wrote in post #4224915 (external link)
That's what I thought at first, but this quote says otherwise (I think)

Right. Let us see if we can get this straight. So if the image is viewed in LR it looks like the first image posted above (sort of looks underexposed, but more like a WB/contrast issue). If viewed in Irfanview it looks fine. Then if the image is exported from LR is still looks fine in Irfanview. Is that correct, Hurricane?


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 08:54 |  #21

In2Photos wrote in post #4224763 (external link)
Wow, that is interesting. The only thing that I can think of is that Irfanview is using a different monitor profile than LR or Irfanview is doing some type of Auto function itself and brightening the photo. Can you email me the JPEG?

I did double check Iview this AM before I left and any of the auto settings that it would apply (it had 1 for gamma) were unchecked, so it should be rendering these untouched. I'll double check again when I get home.

I'll shoot you the jpg when I get home this evening as well. FWIW, it seems to be doing this with all of them and I do have some on my laptop here at work that I can send.

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 09:01 |  #22

In2Photos wrote in post #4224979 (external link)
Right. Let us see if we can get this straight. So if the image is viewed in LR it looks like the first image posted above (sort of looks underexposed, but more like a WB/contrast issue). If viewed in Irfanview it looks fine. Then if the image is exported from LR is still looks fine in Irfanview. Is that correct, Hurricane?

Correct, whatever LR is doing to make the image look that way it's not doing on the export, when I export and open back up in Iview it looks like the 2nd file (exposed okay).

I haven't tried changing the WB or adjusting contrast to make the file "look" like it does in Iview, as I really believe (my eyes are telling me anyway) that there's an exposure issue here. LR bumping up the brightness (way up) and exposure on nearly every image sort of confirms that for me as well. Clearly the WB between the two is different, as the LR file produces a bit warmer (yellower) cast, but I still think it's a least a stop under in LR.

The bummer part for me is that I'm afraid to play with the brightness is LR....if I adjust exposure or brightness to make the image look properly exposed in LR then I blow it out when viewing it in other viewers. I haven't tried CS2 yet as I do not have it loaded on my new machine.

Also, just for clarification, these are jpg's out of the camera, not Raw files.

Thanks folks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 31, 2007 09:05 |  #23

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4225046 (external link)
Correct, whatever LR is doing to make the image look that way it's not doing on the export, when I export and open back up in Iview it looks like the 2nd file (exposed okay).

I haven't tried changing the WB or adjusting contrast to make the file "look" like it does in Iview, as I really believe (my eyes are telling me anyway) that there's an exposure issue here. LR bumping up the brightness (way up) and exposure on nearly every image sort of confirms that for me as well. Clearly the WB between the two is different, as the LR file produces a bit warmer (yellower) cast, but I still think it's a least a stop under in LR.

The bummer part for me is that I'm afraid to play with the brightness is LR....if I adjust exposure or brightness to make the image look properly exposed in LR then I blow it out when viewing it in other viewers. I haven't tried CS2 yet as I do not have it loaded on my new machine.

Also, just for clarification, these are jpg's out of the camera, not Raw files.

Thanks folks!

How does the image look in a web browser or file browser?


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 31, 2007 09:12 |  #24

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4225046 (external link)
LR bumping up the brightness (way up) and exposure on nearly every image sort of confirms that for me as well.

So LR is on 'Auto'?
That would explain a few things.
Set all sliders at "0", except blacks (5), contrast (+25) and brightness (+50). Those are about the canon defaults.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 10:15 |  #25

In2Photos wrote in post #4225090 (external link)
How does the image look in a web browser or file browser?

I haven't checked a web browser...can do that when I get home. In a file browser (Explorer) they all look like the Iview image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 10:18 |  #26

René Damkot wrote in post #4225122 (external link)
So LR is on 'Auto'?
That would explain a few things.
Set all sliders at "0", except blacks (5), contrast (+25) and brightness (+50). Those are about the canon defaults.

Sorry....to clarify, it's not set to auto, but when I click Auto LR bumps up the brightness typically between 40 and 70 and also typically bumps exposure by a 3rd stop or so. Since these are jpgs I would expect LR to present the file "as shot," which would included any paramaters used in camera. I could see your point if it were a raw file, but with jpgs i would expect more of a WYSIWYG type deal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 20:38 as a reply to  @ Hurricane_777's post |  #27

Opened it in Paint Shop Pro, Firefox and Windows explorer and they all look like the iview image. Something's seriously out of whack. :(

I did try to adjust WB in LR and while it got the colors closer, it still didn't pick up the exposure stuff that I'm seeing...and it shouldn't, I guess. I then exported the file after getting the colors closer, and the WB in the exported file is all out of whack. My LR isn't displaying right. :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Oct 31, 2007 22:13 as a reply to  @ Hurricane_777's post |  #28

YES!!!! Figured it out!!!! :lol:

http://www.adobeforums​.com/webx/.3bc85da7/0 (external link)

It was a corrupt monitor profile (and mine's a Samsung too...go figure!). Switched it to sRGB and it's all good. Everything matches up now!

Now I need to decide whether to start shooting and viewing in AdobeRGB, but I'll put that one off for a while. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 31, 2007 22:33 |  #29

Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4229998 (external link)
YES!!!! Figured it out!!!! :lol:

http://www.adobeforums​.com/webx/.3bc85da7/0 (external link)

It was a corrupt monitor profile (and mine's a Samsung too...go figure!). Switched it to sRGB and it's all good. Everything matches up now!

Now I need to decide whether to start shooting and viewing in AdobeRGB, but I'll put that one off for a while. :lol:

Glad you found the problem. Do not start using AdobeRGB until you:

a) Calibrate your monitor
b) Have a thorough understanding of color management
c) See a reason to go beyond sRGB (which will go with b)


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hurricane_777
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Taylor, MI
     
Nov 01, 2007 08:56 |  #30

In2Photos wrote in post #4230108 (external link)
Glad you found the problem. Do not start using AdobeRGB until you:

a) Calibrate your monitor
b) Have a thorough understanding of color management
c) See a reason to go beyond sRGB (which will go with b)

Thanks for the tips. :) With where I'm at right now "free-time" wise, I can't see myself making the investment. I'm just happy with the simple fact that (to me) my apps all show the same color and that they show up in the prints I get back from Mpix. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,786 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Lightroom "Auto Tone" Issue
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1261 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.