Wow, that is interesting. The only thing that I can think of is that Irfanview is using a different monitor profile than LR or Irfanview is doing some type of Auto function itself and brightening the photo. Can you email me the JPEG?
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Wow, that is interesting. The only thing that I can think of is that Irfanview is using a different monitor profile than LR or Irfanview is doing some type of Auto function itself and brightening the photo. Can you email me the JPEG? Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Oct 31, 2007 08:31 | #17 If you are viewing the Raw files in both apps, they are bound to look different... LR uses a certain 'default' for a camera that has *no relation whatsoever* to the 'in camera' settings. (Since it can't read them; they are Canon proprietory). "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Oct 31, 2007 08:33 | #18 René Damkot wrote in post #4224855 If you are viewing the Raw files in both apps, they are bound to look different... LR uses a certain 'default' for a camera that has *no relation whatsoever* to the 'in camera' settings. (Since it can't read them; they are Canon proprietory). Only the WB setting is used (and pretty loosely at that). I suspect IrfanView will do it different (I'm guessing it uses the built in jpg preview), and another raw converter will be different yet again. In the above example, IMO exposure didn't change. WB and contrast did. I agree except that he mentioned he tried exporting the images from LR and got the same result. So if LR is altering the file it should show up on the exported version as well as in LR. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Oct 31, 2007 08:42 | #19 In2Photos wrote in post #4224867 I agree except that he mentioned he tried exporting the images from LR and got the same result. That's what I thought at first, but this quote says otherwise (I think) Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4224320 Not converted files, rather this is how they appear in their respective viewers. <...> When I convert the file out of LR (using any of the 3 color spaces) and open using Irfanview, the image looks fine (not under exposed like in the example above). "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Oct 31, 2007 08:50 | #20 René Damkot wrote in post #4224915 That's what I thought at first, but this quote says otherwise (I think) Right. Let us see if we can get this straight. So if the image is viewed in LR it looks like the first image posted above (sort of looks underexposed, but more like a WB/contrast issue). If viewed in Irfanview it looks fine. Then if the image is exported from LR is still looks fine in Irfanview. Is that correct, Hurricane? Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Oct 31, 2007 08:54 | #21 In2Photos wrote in post #4224763 Wow, that is interesting. The only thing that I can think of is that Irfanview is using a different monitor profile than LR or Irfanview is doing some type of Auto function itself and brightening the photo. Can you email me the JPEG? I did double check Iview this AM before I left and any of the auto settings that it would apply (it had 1 for gamma) were unchecked, so it should be rendering these untouched. I'll double check again when I get home.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Oct 31, 2007 09:01 | #22 In2Photos wrote in post #4224979 Right. Let us see if we can get this straight. So if the image is viewed in LR it looks like the first image posted above (sort of looks underexposed, but more like a WB/contrast issue). If viewed in Irfanview it looks fine. Then if the image is exported from LR is still looks fine in Irfanview. Is that correct, Hurricane? Correct, whatever LR is doing to make the image look that way it's not doing on the export, when I export and open back up in Iview it looks like the 2nd file (exposed okay).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Oct 31, 2007 09:05 | #23 Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4225046 Correct, whatever LR is doing to make the image look that way it's not doing on the export, when I export and open back up in Iview it looks like the 2nd file (exposed okay). I haven't tried changing the WB or adjusting contrast to make the file "look" like it does in Iview, as I really believe (my eyes are telling me anyway) that there's an exposure issue here. LR bumping up the brightness (way up) and exposure on nearly every image sort of confirms that for me as well. Clearly the WB between the two is different, as the LR file produces a bit warmer (yellower) cast, but I still think it's a least a stop under in LR. The bummer part for me is that I'm afraid to play with the brightness is LR....if I adjust exposure or brightness to make the image look properly exposed in LR then I blow it out when viewing it in other viewers. I haven't tried CS2 yet as I do not have it loaded on my new machine. Also, just for clarification, these are jpg's out of the camera, not Raw files. Thanks folks! How does the image look in a web browser or file browser? Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Oct 31, 2007 09:12 | #24 Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4225046 LR bumping up the brightness (way up) and exposure on nearly every image sort of confirms that for me as well. So LR is on 'Auto'? "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Oct 31, 2007 10:15 | #25 In2Photos wrote in post #4225090 How does the image look in a web browser or file browser? I haven't checked a web browser...can do that when I get home. In a file browser (Explorer) they all look like the Iview image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Oct 31, 2007 10:18 | #26 René Damkot wrote in post #4225122 So LR is on 'Auto'? That would explain a few things. Set all sliders at "0", except blacks (5), contrast (+25) and brightness (+50). Those are about the canon defaults. Sorry....to clarify, it's not set to auto, but when I click Auto LR bumps up the brightness typically between 40 and 70 and also typically bumps exposure by a 3rd stop or so. Since these are jpgs I would expect LR to present the file "as shot," which would included any paramaters used in camera. I could see your point if it were a raw file, but with jpgs i would expect more of a WYSIWYG type deal.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Opened it in Paint Shop Pro, Firefox and Windows explorer and they all look like the iview image. Something's seriously out of whack.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | YES!!!! Figured it out!!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Oct 31, 2007 22:33 | #29 Hurricane_777 wrote in post #4229998 YES!!!! Figured it out!!!! ![]() http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3bc85da7/0 It was a corrupt monitor profile (and mine's a Samsung too...go figure!). Switched it to sRGB and it's all good. Everything matches up now! Now I need to decide whether to start shooting and viewing in AdobeRGB, but I'll put that one off for a while. ![]() Glad you found the problem. Do not start using AdobeRGB until you: Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hurricane_777 Member 223 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Taylor, MI More info | Nov 01, 2007 08:56 | #30 In2Photos wrote in post #4230108 Glad you found the problem. Do not start using AdobeRGB until you: a) Calibrate your monitor b) Have a thorough understanding of color management c) See a reason to go beyond sRGB (which will go with b) Thanks for the tips.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1261 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||