I just noticed in my folder of D-Rebel photos that they are named as IMG_5023 and so on. My camera is 1 week old. Is this the count on how many photos my camera has taken? How can I find out the exact amount that it has taken?
Conk Goldmember 3,368 posts Joined Jul 2002 Location: Cloverdale B.C. More info | Apr 24, 2004 16:58 | #1 I just noticed in my folder of D-Rebel photos that they are named as IMG_5023 and so on. My camera is 1 week old. Is this the count on how many photos my camera has taken? How can I find out the exact amount that it has taken? Cloverdale Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chazs Senior Member 515 posts Joined Aug 2002 Location: NW Washington More info | Apr 24, 2004 17:31 | #2 My guess is that is how many digital pictures your flash card has had on it, but I'm not sure. I've used the same few flash cards the past few years on my Canon S30 and S40, which has been about 3000 pictures. I too just purchased a DRebel a week ago, and after reformatting the card in the DRebel, the numbering scheme continued where it left off with my S40. May be something similar in your situation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Belmondo Cream of the Crop 42,735 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jul 2003 Location: 92210 More info | Apr 24, 2004 17:46 | #3 That's very likely what happened. I had two 10Ds, and I was pretty sloppy about mixing CF cards between the two of them. All of a suuden, the newer body had almost exactly the same number of shots showing as the older more often-used body. I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 25, 2004 11:03 | #4 The card was new with the camera and as we all know, they are sealed in plastic in those child proof packages. This is really starting to bug me. I'll be a little upset to find that my new camera was sold to me with over 5000 photos already taken. Cloverdale Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
petrus Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined Nov 2003 More info | Apr 25, 2004 13:11 | #5 I had the same experience with my 300D, but the starting number was something around 700. The CF card was previously used in a D7i. I really examined the camera, but never found any trace of it having been in use before.... but I cannot be sure!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AzzKicker Goldmember 1,107 posts Likes: 69 Joined Jul 2003 Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas More info | Apr 25, 2004 13:21 | #6 well something is up and I would be concerned, because I bought my 300D brand new and with a brand new 256mb CF card. And the numbers started at IMG_001.jpg Ruben D. Zamora
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roger_Cavanagh Goldmember 1,394 posts Joined Sep 2001 More info | Apr 25, 2004 13:26 | #7 Almost certainly the reading on your new camera is the result of testing with a card that has been used in other cameras. There is no way for 10D owners to find out the number of shutter actuations; I would guess the 300DRebel is the same. Canon service technicians have software that will tell them this statistic, but whether they would tell users... =============
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 25, 2004 13:51 | #8 Thanks for the replies. I have just returned from the dealer where I bought the camera. I first showed the salesman the image number from the camera then formatted the card and took another photo. The image count went from 3028 to 5029. I reformatted the card and then inserted it into another brand new Rebel right from the box and took a photo. The image count went to 5030. Cloverdale Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ronchappel Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 3,554 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Qld ,Australia More info | Apr 25, 2004 21:52 | #9 Um hangon....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Goofup Member 100 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Oklahoma More info | Apr 25, 2004 22:01 | #10 I'm wondering what happens after #9999 is taken. Does it start all over again?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AzzKicker Goldmember 1,107 posts Likes: 69 Joined Jul 2003 Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas More info | Apr 25, 2004 22:04 | #11 ron chappel wrote: Um hangon.... I thought one just sets the camera to 'file numbering-continuous' in the camera menu and one can tell exactly how many shots have been taken....? ![]()
Ruben D. Zamora
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roger_Cavanagh Goldmember 1,394 posts Joined Sep 2001 More info | Apr 26, 2004 03:25 | #12 AzzKicker wrote: ron chappel wrote: Um hangon.... I thought one just sets the camera to 'file numbering-continuous' in the camera menu and one can tell exactly how many shots have been taken....? ![]()
If you have more than one camera and swap cards between them, it is possible to affect the sequence. The camera tries to avoid duplicating file names and so if you use a card that has a higher image number than the camera has reached, it will use the starting point dictated by the card. =============
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ronchappel Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 3,554 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Qld ,Australia More info | Apr 26, 2004 07:07 | #13 Looks like roger has it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roger_Cavanagh Goldmember 1,394 posts Joined Sep 2001 More info | Apr 26, 2004 09:06 | #14 ron chappel wrote: I have heard many times that canon can tell how many total actuations but i've never heard it confirmed by canon. Canon US' Chuck Westfall did confirm this on RG's forums once. =============
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Apr 26, 2004 11:10 | #15 Conk said: The image count went from 3028 to 5029. I reformatted the card and then inserted it into another brand new Rebel right from the box and took a photo. The image count went to 5030. Did you miss the info on file numbering on page 58 of the manual? You can reset to zero if you want to. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2215 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||