ximix Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Russia, Western Siberia More info | Feb 01, 2013 23:35 | #8806
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ximix Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Russia, Western Siberia More info | Feb 01, 2013 23:51 | #8807 |
Feb 02, 2013 08:47 | #8808      Jon | JMBPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonFanBoy Member 146 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Boston, Massachusetts More info | Feb 02, 2013 23:49 | #8809   EN8A3994 by CanonNikonFanboy, on FlickrCanon Eos 5DIII | Nikon D700 | 70-200 f/2.8l IS II | 100 f/2.8l | 50 f/1.2l
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 03, 2013 00:30 | #8810  Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonKx5 Member  80 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2012 More info | Feb 03, 2013 10:53 | #8811 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member  855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Feb 03, 2013 10:59 | #8812 Saw pics you took with both Canon 50 1.2 and Sigma 50 1.4 and I think the Canon rendition is definitely better, and sharper wide open too. What do you think ? Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop  12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Feb 03, 2013 14:48 | #8813 vaflower wrote in post #15567507 Saw pics you took with both Canon 50 1.2 and Sigma 50 1.4 and I think the Canon rendition is definitely better, and sharper wide open too. What do you think ? IMO, sigma 50 1.4 wins in terms of value. I find the Sigma to be sharper then the Canon wide open, stopped down they are virtually the same lens. The thing the Sigma doesn't have is the Canon 50L look to it, some images taken with the 50L wide open have a 3D effect to them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
behindtheglass Senior Member  413 posts Joined Aug 2012 Location: San Jose, Ca More info | Feb 03, 2013 15:08 | #8814 Aventador, nice! |Gear list// 500PX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member 855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Feb 03, 2013 17:34 | #8815 laxlife1234 wrote in post #15568218 IMO, sigma 50 1.4 wins in terms of value. I find the Sigma to be sharper then the Canon wide open, stopped down they are virtually the same lens. The thing the Sigma doesn't have is the Canon 50L look to it, some images taken with the 50L wide open have a 3D effect to them. I used to shoot Sigma 50 1.4 before, the focusing accuracy is quite horrible as it shifts between its distances and lacks consistency. Besides that they do have different looks. The Sigma bokeh is really smooth and buttery but the Canon bokeh looks a bit more exciting to me. Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Winwin Senior Member 702 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Feb 03, 2013 20:41 | #8816 vaflower wrote in post #15568767 I used to shoot Sigma 50 1.4 before, the focusing accuracy is quite horrible as it shifts between its distances and lacks consistency. Besides that they do have different looks. The Sigma bokeh is really smooth and buttery but the Canon bokeh looks a bit more exciting to me. Yea I used to own both too when I used to have a 5D2. The Canon focused better and had its distinctive bokeh. Image quality-wise I found little to no difference. The Sigma AF drove me nuts. Win.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Feb 03, 2013 22:22 | #8817 vaflower wrote in post #15568767 I used to shoot Sigma 50 1.4 before, the focusing accuracy is quite horrible as it shifts between its distances and lacks consistency. Besides that they do have different looks. The Sigma bokeh is really smooth and buttery but the Canon bokeh looks a bit more exciting to me. Yeah, I guess it really depends on the copy. I own 1 sigma, but have owned 2 Canon 50L's and the Sigma beats the Canons in terms of focusing, sharpness, and bokeh. I will admit I like the 3D look that canon has but for 50mm, sigmas bokeh is way smoother. I could settle for either bokeh though, but I think technically speaking and valuewise the sigma would be the winner.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonKx5 Member 80 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2012 More info | Feb 03, 2013 23:31 | #8818 behindtheglass wrote in post #15568322 Aventador, nice! What was your settings if you dont mind me asking. Thanks behindtheglass... I see you interested into car too
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevinlomax Member 120 posts Likes: 37 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Verona More info | Feb 04, 2013 12:30 | #8819 |
ximix Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Russia, Western Siberia More info | Feb 04, 2013 20:06 | #8820 vaflower wrote in post #15567507 Saw pics you took with both Canon 50 1.2 and Sigma 50 1.4 and I think the Canon rendition is definitely better, and sharper wide open too. What do you think ? I think that they are almost identical
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 2119 guests, 96 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
