Hi there
Does anyone use Lightroom for sharpening on a regular basis (as opposed to sharpening in Photoshop)?
What are the pros and cons?
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Apr 20, 2007 06:58 | #1 Hi there
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Apr 20, 2007 07:00 | #2 I leave it at 25 default, then use Photoshop for my "real" sharpening. I find Lightroom's default to be a nice basis to kind of overcome the RAW, but if I crank it up I think it sucks. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | I only use it during printing (if I didn't export to CS2 to do other things, but then I would probably print from CS2). When I used Bridge/ACR/CS2 I set my ACR defaults for sharpening to "Preview Only" so the settings were not applied when I opened the file in CS2. The next time I open LR I plan to create a preset with my generic starting points and use that preset during import (which for some reason I just have forgotten to do). I plan to set sharpening to 0. I can't wait for a better sharpening tool for LR. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dawnrogers Goldmember 1,190 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: England More info | Apr 20, 2007 07:22 | #4 I leave it on the default of 25 too...it doesn't seem to have great deal of effect, so I do the sharpening in CS2.....its the one thing I'd really like them to add. Dawn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canoflan Goldmember 1,059 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Texas, US More info | Apr 20, 2007 08:15 | #5 Permanent banI use LR at 20, then finish in PS. The 20 setting brings that minor softness of the RAW file back into the groove.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeJay Goldmember 3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Apr 20, 2007 08:19 | #6 It sounds like I'm not alone in thinking that the sharpening feature in lR leave a little to be desired. Basically I have mine set to 25, but if I need it to increase it much more it seems to make an awfull job of it. IMHO. 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Apr 20, 2007 09:20 | #7 Thanks for the comments guys. It seems that you all confirm my belief that sharpening (and printing for that matter) is still best done in CS2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Apr 20, 2007 09:30 | #8 Roy Mathers wrote in post #3074265 Thanks for the comments guys. It seems that you all confirm my belief that sharpening (and printing for that matter) is still best done in CS2. For now, anyway. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canoflan Goldmember 1,059 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Texas, US More info | Apr 20, 2007 15:56 | #9 Permanent banRoy Mathers wrote in post #3074265 Thanks for the comments guys. It seems that you all confirm my belief that sharpening (and printing for that matter) is still best done in CS2. I am sure you know why. There are far and wide volumes of documents and text telling of the nature of sharpening only the edges within pictures, including using the same techniques to avoid sharpening noise. LR appears to try and sharpen everything, must like that in Adobe Camera Raw. That being the case, unless USM type sliders, high pass sharpening replicas, are incorporated into LRs sharpening, it won't begin to even compare to a good edge mask in PS with a bit of high pass sharpening.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ohtoberich Member 118 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Wheeling, IL More info | Apr 20, 2007 17:47 | #10 According to an Inside Lightroom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
widowmaker Senior Member 329 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slemmestad, Norway More info | Apr 21, 2007 02:28 | #11 I set the sharpening in lightroom to 0. Instead, I've created a droplet, which I placed in the Export actions folder in lightroom. I created Scott Kelby's lab sharpening tips in Photoshop CS2, and saved this droplet in lightroom. So when I export my photos, I just click my lab sharpening droplet in the bottom of the export window. Works great! www.fotografbjornstad.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeJay Goldmember 3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Apr 21, 2007 02:36 | #12 widowmaker wrote in post #3078515 I set the sharpening in lightroom to 0. Instead, I've created a droplet, which I placed in the Export actions folder in lightroom. I created Scott Kelby's lab sharpening tips in Photoshop CS2, and saved this droplet in lightroom. So when I export my photos, I just click my lab sharpening droplet in the bottom of the export window. Works great! Would you mind explaining that in a little more detail (I have Scotts book which should help) 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nwa2 Goldmember 1,131 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Manitoba More info | I generally leave sharpening to the last process. Inevitably this means sharpening in CS2. Canon 6D; 7D; 40D:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Apr 21, 2007 02:45 | #14 Unless you do EVERYTHING in LR and never touch Photoshop after conversion, there's no point letting LR do all your sharpening anyway, regardless of how good it gets, since sharpening is best left as the final step before output. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
widowmaker Senior Member 329 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slemmestad, Norway More info | Apr 21, 2007 02:50 | #15 TJ, I will give it a go. In Kelby's book, the whole process of creating the lab sharpening action, is located on page 374-379. After you have created the action, you will have to make this action a droplet. Go to File-Automate-Create Droplet (in Photoshop CS2, NOT lightroom). In the "destination" option, browse your computer, until you find where lightroom is located. Then find the folder within lightroom, which is called "Export actions". Open this folder, and save the droplet in there, named "lab sharpening". And that's it. The next time you want to export a photo from lightroom, adding the lab sharpening technique, just go to the export window, and select "lab sharpening" in the bottom dialog, asking you what to do once your photo is exported. www.fotografbjornstad.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1606 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||