 | HTTP response: 404 | Byte size: ZERO |
wlaramie Goldmember  2,518 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Mid-Atlantic Region, USA More info | Apr 23, 2007 11:58 | #1
Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hTr Cream of the Crop  22,453 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Northern Alabama More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:00 | #2 Pretty damn nice test Bill gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wlaramie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,518 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Mid-Atlantic Region, USA More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:03 | #3 Gary thanks. I was trying to get the EXIF file to attach and hadn't meant to submit yet but I'm glad you like the shot. I'm still working with the 100-400L and 70-200L and 1.4 TC. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wlaramie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,518 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Mid-Atlantic Region, USA More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:06 | #4 Here's one with the EXIF intact, click the image to see the data
Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hTr Cream of the Crop 22,453 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Northern Alabama More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:07 | #5 wlaramie wrote in post #3090126  Gary thanks. I was trying to get the EXIF file to attach and hadn't meant to submit yet but I'm glad you like the shot. I'm still working with the 100-400L and 70-200L and 1.4 TC. I see no EXIF with this picture. I personally prefer the primes. 300/4 and 500/4 with or without the 1.4 TC. I do have a good copy of the 70-200/4 that is a walk around lens. gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hTr Cream of the Crop 22,453 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Northern Alabama More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:08 | #6 wlaramie wrote in post #3090143 Here's one with the EXIF intact, click the image to see the data IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] Yep came right up. Good job gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wlaramie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,518 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Mid-Atlantic Region, USA More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:10 | #7 Last one for now, a Chickadee
Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wlaramie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,518 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Mid-Atlantic Region, USA More info | Apr 23, 2007 12:16 | #8 Gary, thanks. the work you, Mitch, Reyno and several of the other members produce have convinced me that for serious birding, the primes are the way to go and have started saving for one. I just got the 70-200L 2.8 and am really impressed with the quality of the lens. Shots 2 and 3 were made with the new lens. The first shot was with the 100-400L Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2788 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
EXIF didn't come through fully on this one either.