Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Apr 2007 (Wednesday) 02:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post processing - quick question

 
Flame
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Apr 25, 2007 02:49 |  #1

Hello,

I recently posted a photo in the birds section using my basic PS skills *coughsautosettingscou​ghs*. After doing some reading online I've refined my skills.

I would love the opinions of people in regards to whether I made the photo any better or completely messed it up.

Thanks in advance to those who are willing to help me.

1. quickly processed - as in auto....

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


2. manual processing - I think the sharpening may be overdone :confused:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


3. same processing as above except with reduced sharpening
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Once again thank you for your time.

Kind Regards

Sandra
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 25, 2007 04:08 |  #2

I like #3 best...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Apr 25, 2007 06:24 |  #3

Sandra -
To my taste, the water is too saturated and bright. Besides looking unnatural it also detracts from the main subject. If I may suggest something like this,


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Apr 25, 2007 07:14 |  #4

Personally I like the highly-saturated blue water. But that's a personal thing.

More importantly, I would suggest:
1. There is a bright halo under the bird's beak. That could be indicative of over-sharpening. If you're using USM, try reducing the radius.
2. The colour of the bird has shifted considerably from #1 to #2 and #3. I don't know which is right because I wasn't there, but to my mind #2 and #3 look a bit too purple. That might be something you want to take a look at.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Apr 26, 2007 21:37 |  #5

Thank you all for your input.

At least I know I'm kinda heading in the right direction. I shall continue to delve into the world of photoshop to refine my skills.

Oh, and the colour of the bird is more natural in my 2nd and 3rd attempts than in the 1st. I think the WB is wrong in the 1st one.


Sandra
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,978 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au
     
Apr 27, 2007 00:37 |  #6

#3 gets my vote.

Nice work there :)


http://www.edwardhor.c​om (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/edwardhor/ (external link)
http://www.modelmayhem​.com/EdwardHor (external link)
http://www.twitter.com​/edwardhor (external link)
justAL: PIxel peeping is what separates the men from the boys!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,250 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Post processing - quick question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
670 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.