Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Apr 2007 (Friday) 20:54
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which apple laptop?"
1.83ghz Macbook (White)
1
4%
2.0ghz Macbook (White)
3
12%
2.0ghz Macbook (Black)
4
16%
15" Macbook Pro
16
64%
Other?
1
4%

25 voters, 25 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which apple laptop?!?

 
aaronpass
Senior Member
517 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Apr 27, 2007 20:54 |  #1

I am going to be purchasing an apple macpro at the beginning of june and am thinking of selling my toshiba laptop and getting a mac laptop to complement it. What do you all think, macbook or macbook pro. What size and what specs? Ignore RAM and harddrive size because I would update that later. Please help. Thanks.

Aaron


Aaron Pass | Photographer and Graphic Designer
www.aaronpass.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 27, 2007 20:59 |  #2

What's your intent for the laptop? I went the route of the 2gHz Macbook since I don't use the laptop too heavily for photo work. When I do, the image files get migrated into my Aperture library on the Mini. Unless you need the ability to drive two monitors independently or need 3 gigs I'm not so sure there's much of an advantage to the Macbook Pro.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronpass
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
517 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Apr 27, 2007 21:03 |  #3

I will mostly be using it for traveling when I take pictures to dump them on it. Then when I get home I can put them on my macpro. I will also be shooting strait onto the laptop with a USB from the camera. Also the occasional school usage.


Aaron Pass | Photographer and Graphic Designer
www.aaronpass.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 85
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
Apr 27, 2007 21:09 |  #4

The main reason if it were me between the black and the pro, would be that the pro has a real video chipset (i.e. not shared memory) and it will be more flexible with external monitors.


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronpass
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
517 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Apr 27, 2007 21:18 |  #5

I will not be using an external monitor on it so no need for that.


Aaron Pass | Photographer and Graphic Designer
www.aaronpass.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 27, 2007 21:28 |  #6

dwnhillskater wrote in post #3116677 (external link)
I will mostly be using it for traveling when I take pictures to dump them on it. Then when I get home I can put them on my macpro. I will also be shooting strait onto the laptop with a USB from the camera. Also the occasional school usage.

Well, you and I were in a similar boat. I went with the 13" Macbook and 2 gigs and I'm very happy with it. With the money I saved I bought CS3 Design Standard (Photoshop, Indesign, Illustrator and Acrobat). Just waiting for it to arrive...


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wlescall
Senior Member
512 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Northern Panhandle, WV
     
Apr 27, 2007 22:55 |  #7

For what you describe - get one of the Macbooks & add additional ram.


Bill
EOS 5Dmkiii, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 mkii, 580 EX II , Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS
2 desktops & 2 laptops (PC & Mac each)
Chronon Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rockabilly808
Goldmember
Avatar
1,700 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Castine, Maine by way of Kanoehe, Hawaii
     
Apr 27, 2007 23:18 |  #8

if you'r gonna be using it for travel I'd for with a black macbook with 2 gigs RAM, thst what I hae and I love it. my macbook has logged over over 12,000 miles and 6 countries with me and my 30D.


Nathan
Nikon D80 Nikor 18-200VR yes I shoot with a nikon, get over it
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/playgroundearth​/ (external link)[/SIZE]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
Apr 28, 2007 09:31 |  #9

I don't have a Macbook (Pro) but I have been looking at them in a local Apple store.

The major difference between the regular Macbook and the Pro is in the video card. The regular Macbook doesn't have a very powerful video card and it doesn't have its own video memory (it uses part of the normal RAM of the computer). The Macbook Pro has a much better (faster) video card with its own dedicated video memory.

If you need fast graphics, for example for games, video editing etc., get the Pro. Otherwise a regular Macbook will also do.


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 28, 2007 12:31 |  #10

Jesper wrote in post #3118782 (external link)
The regular Macbook doesn't have a very powerful video card and it doesn't have its own video memory (it uses part of the normal RAM of the computer). The Macbook Pro has a much better (faster) video card with its own dedicated video memory.

If you need fast graphics, for example for games, video editing etc., get the Pro. Otherwise a regular Macbook will also do.

For photo work and video editing, the Macbook is perfectly adequate, so long as you have 2 gigs of RAM. The GMA 950 video chip uses 80 mb of RAM and is perfectly capable of quickly processing RAW images and 30 fps video at DVD quality. Personally, I don't think its worth another $400 to $500 for the Macbook Pro for what the OP's needs are (which are vitually identical to mine).


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronpass
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
517 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Apr 28, 2007 15:21 |  #11

Looks like I will be going with the Black Macbook. I hope I will be able to squeeze out that extra cash. Thanks for all your help everyone.

Aaron


Aaron Pass | Photographer and Graphic Designer
www.aaronpass.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,073 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Which apple laptop?!?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2814 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.