Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 29 Apr 2007 (Sunday) 18:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Polarizer over UV or take UV off?

 
gonzophoto
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 29, 2007 18:20 |  #1

Just wondering if I should take the UV filter off before using a circular polarizer or do should I just put it on over the UV filter?


http://bhhstudios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,933 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Apr 29, 2007 18:22 |  #2

Don't double up filters. Take the UV off.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzophoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 29, 2007 18:23 |  #3

Thats what I thought, but why not double up filters?


http://bhhstudios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Apr 29, 2007 18:28 |  #4

You don't need the UV at all, let alone with another filter on it.

Why no doubling? Because the more glass you add, the more you degrade IQ.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 29, 2007 18:38 |  #5

Every extra glass surface you add to the front of a lens increases the risk of flare in the image or possible distortion of the image. Each filter actually has two surfaces, each of which can contribute to problems.

By using only the highest available quality multicoated filters you can minimize the potential for these problems, but stacking filters - even the best filters - is not a wise thing to do unless you need all of the filters for some creative purpose.

By the way, "IQ" in the previous post means Image Quality.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Apr 29, 2007 20:37 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #6

Stacking filters can also lead to image vignetting with wide angle lenses. The lens will "see" the edges of the filter and will darken the edges of the image. There is no real need for a UV filter for protections of the lens. A good lens hood does a better job and offers other benefits as well. Ditch it...


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Space
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: 3rd Planet
     
Apr 29, 2007 21:38 |  #7

Don't stack them. I use filters mostly to protect the glass. They come off when I want to get serious.


Common Sense...Isn't
...............

30D ll 5D ll 24-70mm f/2.8L ll 70-200mm f/4L ll 200mm II f/2.8L ll EF 1.4 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzophoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 29, 2007 21:53 |  #8

cdifoto wrote in post #3125023 (external link)
You don't need the UV at all, let alone with another filter on it.



I never thought I needed car insurence till it was broken into.

You will regret not putting on a expensive filter if and when something ever happens to the front of the lens.

Studio = No Filter
Field = Filter


http://bhhstudios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzophoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 29, 2007 21:59 |  #9

Thanks to everyone for the answers, this is what I thought. I was just double checking because someone had mention stacking ND filters and I wanted to double check.


http://bhhstudios.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Apr 30, 2007 01:42 |  #10

I always keep my UV on, and due to my clumsiness have badly scratched two of them, therefore I have saved myself a hell of a lot of money in lens repair bills.

Also I use the Hoya Super HMC filters which allow 99.7% of light through. Now you find me someone who can detect that 0.3% of light difference in their lens or pictures and I'll eat my hat.

If your just out taking photos for yourself, then save your lenses from damage and the hassle of screwing filters on and off dozens of times and just double up.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Apr 30, 2007 11:40 |  #11

NDs you may need to stack to get a stronger effect. A UV filter does nothing for the picture with digital, so all stacking a polarizer on top of it does is increase the likelihood of vignetting.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Apr 30, 2007 11:42 |  #12

never stick two filters together unless you have to. another very possible disadvantage to stacking filters is they can get stuck together, and are very difficult to get off of eachother.


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,507 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Polarizer over UV or take UV off?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is qwerty677
866 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.