Just wondering if I should take the UV filter off before using a circular polarizer or do should I just put it on over the UV filter?
gonzophoto Senior Member ![]() 262 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Apr 29, 2007 18:20 | #1 Just wondering if I should take the UV filter off before using a circular polarizer or do should I just put it on over the UV filter?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity ![]() 10,933 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Apr 29, 2007 18:22 | #2 Don't double up filters. Take the UV off. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2007 18:23 | #3 |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me ![]() 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Apr 29, 2007 18:28 | #4 You don't need the UV at all, let alone with another filter on it. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop ![]() 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Apr 29, 2007 18:38 | #5 Every extra glass surface you add to the front of a lens increases the risk of flare in the image or possible distortion of the image. Each filter actually has two surfaces, each of which can contribute to problems. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... ![]() 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | Stacking filters can also lead to image vignetting with wide angle lenses. The lens will "see" the edges of the filter and will darken the edges of the image. There is no real need for a UV filter for protections of the lens. A good lens hood does a better job and offers other benefits as well. Ditch it... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Space Senior Member ![]() 935 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2007 Location: 3rd Planet More info | Apr 29, 2007 21:38 | #7 Don't stack them. I use filters mostly to protect the glass. They come off when I want to get serious. Common Sense...Isn't
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2007 21:53 | #8 cdifoto wrote in post #3125023 ![]() You don't need the UV at all, let alone with another filter on it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2007 21:59 | #9 Thanks to everyone for the answers, this is what I thought. I was just double checking because someone had mention stacking ND filters and I wanted to double check.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Anke "that rump shot is just adorable" UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 ![]() 30,454 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK More info | Apr 30, 2007 01:42 | #10 I always keep my UV on, and due to my clumsiness have badly scratched two of them, therefore I have saved myself a hell of a lot of money in lens repair bills. Anke
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop ![]() 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Apr 30, 2007 11:40 | #11 NDs you may need to stack to get a stronger effect. A UV filter does nothing for the picture with digital, so all stacking a polarizer on top of it does is increase the likelihood of vignetting. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid ![]() 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Apr 30, 2007 11:42 | #12 never stick two filters together unless you have to. another very possible disadvantage to stacking filters is they can get stuck together, and are very difficult to get off of eachother. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is qwerty677 866 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |