S-Man Goldmember 2,008 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | May 01, 2008 23:16 | #1201 leftofedge wrote in post #5444327  Get this, and then get the 17-55 IS. Both should be L's in my opinion. I'm trying to decide what my next purchase will be. I'm going to be shooting alot more automotive shots, interiors etc. It's between this and the 17-55. I've read the vignetting can be very noticeable with a high f-# and wide angle...is this true?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jasonleehl Senior Member 521 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | May 02, 2008 00:14 | #1202 S-Man wrote in post #5444724 I'm trying to decide what my next purchase will be. I'm going to be shooting alot more automotive shots, interiors etc. It's between this and the 17-55. I've read the vignetting can be very noticeable with a high f-# and wide angle...is this true? I see that you have a Tammy 28-75.... So perhaps 10-22 would be more useful for you! You're welcome to follow me at Instagram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jethro790 Goldmember  2,193 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Southern New Hampshire More info | May 02, 2008 11:27 | #1203 S-Man wrote in post #5444724 I'm trying to decide what my next purchase will be. I'm going to be shooting alot more automotive shots, interiors etc. It's between this and the 17-55. I've read the vignetting can be very noticeable with a high f-# and wide angle...is this true? The vignetting I have experienced in my shots with the 10-22 has actually been quite desireable.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
4rgentum Member  67 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: LA/Orange County More info | May 02, 2008 11:37 | #1204 S-Man wrote in post #5444724 I'm trying to decide what my next purchase will be. I'm going to be shooting alot more automotive shots, interiors etc. It's between this and the 17-55. I've read the vignetting can be very noticeable with a high f-# and wide angle...is this true? This was taken at 10mm f/13  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 5DII //30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S-Man Goldmember 2,008 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 More info | May 04, 2008 01:06 | #1205 4rgentum wrote in post #5447332 This was taken at 10mm f/13 That looks great! I'm going to have to shoot high F-# too, probably not more than 11 or 13, but mostly above 8. I don't see any vig on F-13...This helps me out alot, especially since the 10-22 is cheaper!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
  5D III, R7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
junzo13 Member  60 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Manila More info |
corosario Member  173 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Houston, TX More info | May 04, 2008 15:24 | #1208 Ala Moana Beach, Hawaii  Carlos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 05, 2008 09:39 | #1209 Taken on 5/4/08. Chevy Tahoe stretch limo. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyWebber Goldmember 3,187 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain More info | May 05, 2008 21:02 | #1210 This lens produces lovely colours. Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stic[]WiT[]iT Junior Member  24 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | I always wanted this lens and just recently i purchased it with no regrets.    Yet another Stic[]WiT[]iT Production...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cherrymoon Senior Member  533 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | May 06, 2008 11:35 | #1212 I must admit that I really experiment this lens for the 1st time this week-end.
I love it's capacity to take pictures in low available light !!! You canno't imagine how dark was this scene (where my 24-105 failed, without flash of course). The 10-22 really "create" the light, it seems unrealistic. Do you have same experiences ? Why this effect ?
Just to give you an idea, this picture was taken at the other hand of the upper shot. You can notice that the music band was playing in the darkest place of the church :
Sometimes, it allows you to be IN the scene for shooting !
I became a UWA addict  5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h0rde Senior Member  506 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | May 06, 2008 12:03 | #1213 ^^ was that a band of nothing but accordion players? I can't even imagine how that must sound. (god-awful comes to mind Olympus OM-D E-M1 mkII | 7-14mm f/2.8 | 12-100mm f/4 | 40-150mm f/2.8 | 25mm f/1.2 | 20mm f/1.7 | Lensbaby Velvet 56 | Lensbaby Burnside 35 (Canon EOS mount) | Zeiss 25mm f/2 (Canon EOS mount) | (Formerly Canon 5DC, 40D, 5D2...)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cherrymoon Senior Member 533 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | May 06, 2008 14:40 | #1214 Ya, accordion player ! Whatever, this is not accordion like you think, you must change register to have a sound like a flute. 5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cherrymoon Senior Member 533 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | May 06, 2008 14:43 | #1215 And another 10-22 point of view !
[URL=http://g.imageshac 5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1042 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
