Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

An another from our recent trip to GNP.

Canon EOS 40D Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
1/400s f/8.0 at 22.0mm iso200

i really like that one
a little too much sky but really great clarity and landscape

somethingsimple wrote in post #5980338
i really like that one
a little too much sky but really great clarity and landscape

I think the extra sky really brings out how small we really are in such vast landscapes. Nicely done!

Nice! Self-timer?

Tsmith wrote in post #5979735
An another from our recent trip to GNP.

Canon EOS 40D Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
1/400s f/8.0 at 22.0mm iso200

John_TX wrote in post #5980389
I think the extra sky really brings out how small we really are in such vast landscapes. Nicely done!

Yeah I thought about a crop but left it Full Frame for that very reason.

skanter wrote in post #5980750
Nice! Self-timer?

That's my son and his fiancee _

Thanks guys

skanter wrote in post #5980750
Nice! Self-timer?

He would have to be a very fast hiker to outrun the 10 second delay

aridan wrote in post #5981799
He would have to be a very fast hiker to outrun the 10 second delay

Not to mention the hops of a mountain goat!

here my most recent one, I shot this last night for a magazine feature.

jdmoto wrote in post #5981823
here my most recent one, I shot this last night for a magazine feature.

Excellent work! A perfect example of how things just get awesome when you go wide and get tight!

Nice lighting, btw. The strobist would approve!

aridan wrote in post #5981799
He would have to be a very fast hiker to outrun the 10 second delay

mattograph wrote in post #5981809
Not to mention the hops of a mountain goat!

That's why I made the ***joke*** about the self-timer!

i got my b+w polarizer yesterday. i know some people have issues (vignetting) with the regular ones on a UWA lens, but i have also seen where several had no issues. I opted to get the regular one vs the slim becuase i still wanted to be able to use my lens cap. (u cant with the slim) anyways i did a couple shots just to test. i get very little in the corners but i dont think its that bad.

let me know what u think, should i have gotten the slim?
shot of the sky this morning

j0sh_dc5 wrote in post #5988320
i got my b+w polarizer yesterday. i know some people have issues (vignetting) with the regular ones on a UWA lens, but i have also seen where several had no issues. I opted to get the regular one vs the slim becuase i still wanted to be able to use my lens cap. (u cant with the slim) anyways i did a couple shots just to test. i get very little in the corners but i dont think its that bad.

let me know what u think, should i have gotten the slim?
shot of the sky this morning

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

I think thats close enough for government work as they say. I have the same setup, and never notice a problem.

My B+W 95mm front thread has no vignetting at 10mm on crop bodies or 16mm on full frame, i love it, bit i can't use any lens cap and i can't have another filter on it, but to use only CPL then this one is unbeatable.

j0sh_dc5 wrote in post #5988320
i got my b+w polarizer yesterday. i know some people have issues (vignetting) with the regular ones on a UWA lens, but i have also seen where several had no issues. I opted to get the regular one vs the slim becuase i still wanted to be able to use my lens cap. (u cant with the slim) anyways i did a couple shots just to test. i get very little in the corners but i dont think its that bad.

let me know what u think, should i have gotten the slim?
shot of the sky this morning

Did you get the F-Pro series? I have the B+W 77mm Kaesemann MRC F-Pro Circular Polarizer Filter (not slim) with front threads and have absolutely no vignetting or darkening of the corners at 10mm.

Sydor25 wrote in post #5863060

Love the 2nd shot...