The light was terrible, and I wanted a shot of the bluebird, so I set up the tripod and took a time delay. When the shutter went off, the little fella on the left was there as well.
Does anyone recognize this species?
tupe Goldmember More info | May 01, 2007 14:40 | #1 The light was terrible, and I wanted a shot of the bluebird, so I set up the tripod and took a time delay. When the shutter went off, the little fella on the left was there as well. --Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KeithR Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | May 01, 2007 16:29 | #2 |
TheGreatOg -Thread Killer- 'nuff said 1,641 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Here, There & Everywhere More info | May 01, 2007 16:38 | #3 Let me start by saying that it's exceptionally difficult to identify without seeing any tail/feather markings. But I've got two guesses for you. Becky Keeling, Denver-based Portraiture and Travel Photographer. My world, from the heart.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pttenn Cream of the Crop 9,671 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Tennessee More info | May 01, 2007 16:54 | #4 Looks like a phoebe to me and around the feeders, birds mix together with no problems. Canon 50D, 40D, Tokina 12-24,Canon 18-55,Canon 28-135 IS, Canon 50 1.8,Canon 75-300 5.6,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davewalters Senior Member 458 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Account inactive please delete More info | May 01, 2007 18:10 | #5 Karens right - it's an Eastern Phoebe. Note measurements given in bird books are from the tip of the bill to the tip of the tail when the bird is extended.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KeithR Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | May 01, 2007 18:47 | #6 I figured it was some kind of phoebe, and wanted to get the ball rolling!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Postiemon Member 200 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Ottawa, On. Canada More info | May 01, 2007 19:08 | #7 TheGreatOg wrote in post #3136046 Let me start by saying that it's exceptionally difficult to identify without seeing any tail/feather markings. But I've got two guesses for you. 1. An easter phoebe. They are in your area and are common near farms and bridges. They have dark heads, solid black bills and wag their tails as a habit. Why I don't think this is what you've got? They're almost 6" tall. 2. What I think you've got there is a juvenille eastern bluebird. Right body, beak and tail shape. Right size. The only variation is the chest plummage. It's hard to tell from your pic if the chest is speckled or just bristled feathers. If speckled, it's the baby to the bluebird next to it. Which makes sense to me. Hope this helps! It's way too early for a juvenile (let alone a baby), even for Bluebird. This is an Eastern Phoebe. A Black Phoebe is Western species and would be rare in the east
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGreatOg -Thread Killer- 'nuff said 1,641 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Here, There & Everywhere More info | Well, it was one of the two. Becky Keeling, Denver-based Portraiture and Travel Photographer. My world, from the heart.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2007 22:21 | #9 Thanks, everyone, for the help. I didn't recognize the head as a phoebe, but I do believe you're right. I saw a phoebe at the top of the hill a few weeks ago. The tail looks like the phoebe's tail I captured last August here: --Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rubberhead Goldmember 1,899 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry More info | May 02, 2007 12:42 | #10 Postiemon wrote in post #3136774 It's way too early for a juvenile (let alone a baby), even for Bluebird. This is an Eastern Phoebe. A Black Phoebe is Western species and would be rare in the east Welcome to the south. Bluebirds around here are already feeding their second broods of the year and have long since run-off the juveniles of the first brood. EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Terry66 Member 249 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Ohio More info | That is without a doubt an eastern phoebe. They are very common in your area. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bsmith6280 Member 205 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | May 02, 2007 13:58 | #12 And i thought phoebe's were only found in Friends. MKIII, 5D, Canon 1.4x and 2x Telec, 580 Ex, Timer Remote, Canon glass: 300mm IS f2.8L, 180mm f3.5L, 70-200 mm f2.8L IS , 24-70mm f2.8L, EF-S 10-22mm, 15mm f2.8 fish, 50 f1.4 (nifty fifty)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGreatOg -Thread Killer- 'nuff said 1,641 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Here, There & Everywhere More info | Alright, where's the pellet gun? Someone put bssmith out of his misery. Becky Keeling, Denver-based Portraiture and Travel Photographer. My world, from the heart.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Postiemon Member 200 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Ottawa, On. Canada More info | May 02, 2007 18:54 | #14 Rubberhead wrote in post #3140420 Welcome to the south. Bluebirds around here are already feeding their second broods of the year and have long since run-off the juveniles of the first brood. In SC, bluebirds will lay their first eggs in February and the first brood will be fleged by mid to late March. The EBB in my back yard will nest three times each year - usually two broods almost back-to-back starting in February then a final brood in July. It seems like the number of eggs, hatching and hatchling survival are highest with the early broods. You're quite right. I wasn't thinking South. We are just getting our first Bluebirds up here now and they are just starting to nest.....It's still an Eastern Phoebe though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2884 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||