Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 May 2007 (Sunday) 18:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lightroom Exported JPEGS lose colour when re-saved in Photoshop

 
S-S
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 06, 2007 18:50 |  #1

HELP! i have processed a whole RAW shoot in LR, and the resulting images are bright and saturated and vibrant... but when i produce copies of these images in PS (CS2) for emailing etc, they change colour in the 'save-for-web' screen and go noticeably duller - even when saved at highest quality

does anyone else have this issue and know how to fix it? i have never experienced a colour change in 'save-for-web' before. tried upping the saturation before saving but really didnt help

also, the original exported LR photos change colour in the same way when displayed within email software like Outlook Express, even when they have not been reduced in photoshop

see sample below:

ps - i processed most of the pics using LR preset: direct positive, and then adjusted from there. dont know if that is significant or not


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,627 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
     
May 06, 2007 18:54 |  #2

Don't use save for web. It's always done that to me. Save as... desired quality level. And strip EXIF another way, if that's why you want to save for web. (only reason I would use it myself)


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 06, 2007 18:59 |  #3

When you "Save For Web" make sure "ICC Profile" is ticked.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 06, 2007 19:10 |  #4

Wazza wrote in post #3162075 (external link)
Don't use save for web. It's always done that to me. Save as... desired quality level. And strip EXIF another way, if that's why you want to save for web. (only reason I would use it myself)

well i find that the images arent small enough if not processed using the saveforweb filter, and its harder to maintain good visual quality with small filesize just using save-as. i dont use save for web for anything but web images, any customer images are always 300+ dpi and save-as at high quality

cdifoto wrote in post #3162091 (external link)
When you "Save For Web" make sure "ICC Profile" is ticked.

it wasnt ticked, so i just tried it: the image did not alter in the preview window, but when i saved it, it matched the original! thanks so much for your help :D

what does ICC Profile mean? should i leave it ticked by default for any other images i process which arent from photo shoots? (im a web/graphic designer etc)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
May 06, 2007 19:11 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #5

I find that the changes you make in Lightroom to RAW files are not known to CS3 when it opens the file - I could have missed something but I tried this and compared one-on-one the same file- one version in Light room and then the same opened directly via CS3. They were visibly different.

I think you have to open the RAW file in Lightroom and tell Lightroom to open the file for PS for editing purposes and LR passes your edit preferences with the file.

What I do because of this is: If I have a batch of files - I will export them from Lighroom to JPEg's and then edit those needing it in PS. Others may be able to shed more light on this subject and I would also appreciate any feedback or guidance. Dennis


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 06, 2007 19:12 |  #6

somethingsimple wrote in post #3162136 (external link)
it wasnt ticked, so i just tried it: the image did not alter in the preview window, but when i saved it, it matched the original! thanks so much for your help :D

what does ICC Profile mean? should i leave it ticked by default for any other images i process which arent from photo shoots? (im a web/graphic designer etc)

I'm not an expert on this color profile business, but the basic jist is an ICC profile is embedded in an image to tell a browser/window/program​/whatever how to render the colors. Not all browsers/windows/progr​ams/whatevers are compatible though and the image may or may not still look a bit wonky depending how it's viewed.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
May 07, 2007 00:17 |  #7

Dchemist wrote in post #3162140 (external link)
If I have a batch of files - I will export them from Lighroom to JPEg's and then edit those needing it in PS.

this is exactly what i did, which is why i couldnt figure out why one jpeg was one set of colours and the copy jpeg was another.

however ticking ICC Profile solved it perfectly so i guess that is the solution




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 07, 2007 01:28 |  #8

Convert to sRgb before you save for web - every time. Not all browsers are color profile aware so just ticking the box while using another profile won't always help AFAIK. If you don't understand color it's safest to stick to sRgb for everything. Customers coming now can clarify later if need be.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brentw
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 19, 2007 23:07 |  #9

tim wrote in post #3163762 (external link)
Convert to sRgb before you save for web - every time. Not all browsers are color profile aware so just ticking the box while using another profile won't always help AFAIK. If you don't understand color it's safest to stick to sRgb for everything. Customers coming now can clarify later if need be.

Absolutely. For those that don't completely understand color profiles, check this out... http://regex.info …-tech/color-spaces-page1/ (external link) ... VERY informative.

:p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BOUNCINGNRG
Goldmember
Avatar
1,794 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: a way around the world
     
Feb 09, 2009 10:47 |  #10

tim wrote in post #3163762 (external link)
Convert to sRgb before you save for web - every time. Not all browsers are color profile aware so just ticking the box while using another profile won't always help AFAIK. If you don't understand color it's safest to stick to sRgb for everything. Customers coming now can clarify later if need be.

Tim,

The conversion to sRGB, is this done in PS or in Lightroom?


London Wedding Photographer (external link) ¦ Wedding Photographer (external link) ¦Gear List ¦Photobucket  (external link)¦corporate event photography (external link) 'I reject your reality and substitute my own'



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 09, 2009 15:48 |  #11

You can choose or convert your output color space in any color profile aware application.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moogul
Member
107 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 12, 2010 20:03 |  #12

Sorry for digging up an old thread, but it was stickied in the LR links master thread.

I am having the same/similar issues when exporting my RAW file to a JPG. I do not have this problem when exporting with DPP. Colors look very different, and I'm fairly positive it has something to do with the color space or embedded ICC profile. Here are my questions/issues.

1. Does Lightroom automatically edit in sRGB space or Adobe RGB? Can I change it to edit in sRGB color space?
2. I have tried to export as sRGB, Adobe RGB (1998) and ProPhoto RGB, all 3 produces a JPG that looks different (color-wise) when viewed with Windows Viewer, ACDSee, IE, Irfanview, etc.
3. I do not have this issue when exporting to JPG with DPP. Though I do notice DPP edits in sRGB color space and has the ability to embed the ICC profile in the pic. I cannot find this option to embed the iCC profile in LR at all. I want to use LR as my main RAW editor, but this issue is driving me nuts.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Edit: The jpg looks correct color wise when I import it back with LR. Nothing else views the JPG correctly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 13, 2010 04:51 |  #13

Moogul wrote in post #9381748 (external link)
1. Does Lightroom automatically edit in sRGB space or Adobe RGB? Can I change it to edit in sRGB color space?

LR "edits" in MelissaRGB. (Kinda like ProPhotoRGB with a different tonal response curve)
Nothing to worry about, since there's no way to alter it.
You can set sRGB, AdobeRGB or ProPhotoRGB as output color space.
I'd recommend sRGB, since you're asking the next question:

Moogul wrote in post #9381748 (external link)
2. I have tried to export as sRGB, Adobe RGB (1998) and ProPhoto RGB, all 3 produces a JPG that looks different (color-wise) when viewed with Windows Viewer, ACDSee, IE, Irfanview, etc.

None of these are color managed. (Assuming Win XP). So you will always see the image different compared to a color managed application such as LR.
sRGB will show the least difference, so use that as working space.

Moogul wrote in post #9381748 (external link)
3. I do not have this issue when exporting to JPG with DPP. Though I do notice DPP edits in sRGB color space and has the ability to embed the ICC profile in the pic. I cannot find this option to embed the iCC profile in LR at all. I want to use LR as my main RAW editor, but this issue is driving me nuts.

If your image looks the same in DPP and a non color managed application, that's because you've set up DPP wrong: In the DPP prefs, there's a "Color management" tab. You should choose your monitor profile there as monitor profile. In your case, it's probably at the default: sRGB:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 403 | MIME changed to 'application/xml'


LR doesn't let you set it wrong: it picks up the monitor profile from the OS settings.
LR also doesn't allow you to export without embedded .icc profile, which is a Good Thing™ IMO.

Moogul wrote in post #9381748 (external link)
Edit: The jpg looks correct color wise when I import it back with LR. Nothing else views the JPG correctly.

That's because LR is color managed.

Note: If you see a huge difference between LR and a non colormanaged application while using sRGB (and you are not using a wide gamut screen), your monitor profile might be corrupt.


If you want accurate displaying of images, calibrate your monitor, set DPP correct, and view images in a colormanaged application.

However: If all you want is consistency between colormanaged an non-colormanaged applications, set sRGB as your monitor profile in the OS
(Note: This will be inaccurate, since your monitor is not sRGB, but it might be relatively close)

If you want more info: Have a read in the links from my sig.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moogul
Member
107 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 13, 2010 21:53 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #14

Thank you very much for the reply Rene. It definitely helps clear things up, and I read the link in your signature as well.

I will definitely look into calibrating my LCD monitor. I noticed the Adobe Gamma, but that seems to be mostly for CRT monitors... the other solutions is some kind of hardware device. Any type of software calibration for LCD's?

Now this all leads up to my ultimate confusion:

Assuming I calibrate my monitor properly, edit in LR, then export to JPG with sRGB, will this mean that other people seeing my jpg on other websites (essentially on another computer) will see the jpg fairly close to what I intended in LR? Or does this mean everyone else will need a color managed app to properly see the photo? I don't believe this to be case, but this what confuses me as well.

Otherwise, it just feels like I'm altering the color to just view properly on my system only. I know this shouldn't be the case.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:19 |  #15

Since most monitors are not designed for photo editing, the worst that happens is that your monitor, when calibrated, will 1) likely have the brightness turned down to match other calibrated/adjusted monitors and color-managed prints and 2) your colors will be adjusted to the right ballpark as well. So, on the non-calibrated monitors, a picture may tend to be brighter than you would see or a print would show, and may have some color variation when viewed side-by-side. But, once your system is set up to match prints, then just tell them to print them out if they have questions.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,143 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Lightroom Exported JPEGS lose colour when re-saved in Photoshop
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1261 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.