Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 May 2007 (Monday) 11:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CS2 sharpen tool

 
shutter_blitz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 08, 2007 11:15 as a reply to  @ post 3171715 |  #16

Rene, this is the color space I work with in Photoshop, so I am guessing its AdobeRGB...?


Gear:
Canon 50D
EF 50mm f1.4 USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Sunpak 383
Quantaray QSX-9500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 08, 2007 11:22 |  #17

'Guessing' isn't the best thing to do for Color management...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutter_blitz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 08, 2007 12:03 |  #18

René Damkot wrote in post #3171793 (external link)
'Guessing' isn't the best thing to do for Color management...

I don't know what answering your looking for, cause I don't have it. Right now, I am trying to figure things out myself. Thats why I am here.


Gear:
Canon 50D
EF 50mm f1.4 USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Sunpak 383
Quantaray QSX-9500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 08, 2007 12:37 |  #19

Okay. Makes sense. Reading back, I guess my comment might have come across as too much a wise ass remark. Not intentionally...

You could start off by reading the link in my sig (this one: here)

That will probabely provide all info on CM you'll want to know, and probabely more.
Also tells you how to set PS, whether sRGB, AdobeRGB or ProPhotoRGB would be a good choice. It also tries to explain why there is a difference between what you see in a CM application and a non CM web browser. So it *might* even explain the problem you are seeing. (I doubt it though, since you said Windows Fax Viewer showed the image fine).

Anyhow, if you're not sure how your CM is set up, you could do worse then *making* sure, and knowing why you set it up like you did.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 08, 2007 12:38 |  #20

shutter_blitz wrote in post #3171749 (external link)
In2photos, could you elaborate on the following. I am not clear on what that means.

"The only other thing that I can think of is that the website (assuming you are viewing from a website since IE is involved) is doing some kind of resizing from an even larger photo that you did not list."

You are viewing the image from IE but you have not stated whether or not this is on a website. You can use IE to view a photo. If it is a photo that you uploaded to a website there might be some resizing that is taking place by the website itself. For example, lets say that I upload a 2400 x 1800 picture to my Pbase account. Now, I give you the address of the site and you go there to view it. The hosting site allows you to view resized images, like 800 x 600. But I only uploaded a 2400 x 1800 pixel image so they are resizing it for you to view. In this case the site is doing the resizing, not IE. But if you view the original 2400 x 1800 size and save it to your computer, than use IE to view the image and it fits the image to your screen size, then IE is doing the resizing. Make any sense?

When you say resizing from an even larger photo that isn't listed, do you mean listed here in the forums?

No. I was wondering if you used a larger sized image then the ones you mentioned earlier but were viewing a smaller version of it. It doen't sound like you were but when you elaborate more on my answer above I will know for sure.

There are a total of 5 pictures that are distorted. They all belong to the same photo shoot, and have the same props and subject. I had some problem with lighting, so had to use the sharen tool on these pcitures. All these pictures have very nearly the same size. I only had to resize one picture from this set to a smaller size, to be able to email it to the client. I looked at the smaller image and its original image in IE and BIngo! the smaller image has no noise, while the original, larger file does!

This thread has helped me figure out the problem. Thx everyone, but what does this mean for my client? Will there be constraints on the usage of such a small picture. These photos are just for viewing, they are photos of recipes on the client's website. People may print them, but they are primarily for online viewing. So I am not concerned about the printing part.

When you resize an image smaller you generally will lose the noise anyway. So this is to be expected. What is the intended use of the photos? Viewing on a web page? Then resize to a smaller image before they go to your client. They won't be able to use a 2600 pixel image on a web page anyway. Not printing means you can definately not worry about pixel size either. Your client will most likely resize the image smaller to work within the limits of the web page as well so send them an 800 pixel image but mention that if they need larger you have that available as well. If you want to be absolutely certain, ask them.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutter_blitz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 08, 2007 14:49 |  #21

Rene, I did go through your link briefly yesterday. It has a lot of information I need to understand. I will be visiting that link frequently as I try to get a handle on CM.

In2photos,
yes your answer now makes sense. Thx.
I am not viewing the photos in a website, I just right click on the photo and select the 'open with IE' option.
Well I guess I have a temp fix for the problem and especially since websites downsize the image anyway. I'll have to work on it for future assignments.

Thx everyone.


Gear:
Canon 50D
EF 50mm f1.4 USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Sunpak 383
Quantaray QSX-9500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,529 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
CS2 sharpen tool
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2817 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.