Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 May 2007 (Monday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best way to PP out background wrinkles

 
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
May 07, 2007 11:43 |  #1

What is the best way to photoshop out small shadows in the background caused by wrinkles in seemless? Attached is an example.
Thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hannaxt
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
     
May 07, 2007 13:34 |  #2

Clone tool.
Create a new blank layer above the image layer.
Select the Clone Stamp then option click or Alt click (PC) on an area you want to use to clone over the wrinkle.

After Opt/Alt clicking then go ahead and start clicking over the wrinkle.


5DMKII •EF50mm f1.4 •EF85mm f1.8 • EF100mm f/2.8 ISL • EF17-40mm f/4L •EF24-70mm f/2.8L •EF70-200mm f/2.8 ISL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
May 07, 2007 13:52 |  #3

AFTER doing the clone thing OR instead of it.

Magic Wand to select the red.

Copy - paste , which creates a new layer of red only

Gaussian blur (Notice that the blur extends over the subject, creating a red fuzziness all the way around her - don't worry about it.)

NEXT STEPS ARE IMPORTANT

Select/reselect

Inverse the selection

Edit/Cut - this step removes the red fuzziness.

- I use this a lot to smooth out pixelated skies

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 07, 2007 14:28 |  #4

Radtech1 wrote in post #3166616 (external link)
AFTER doing the clone thing OR instead of it.

Magic Wand to select the red.

Copy - paste , which creates a new layer of red only

Gaussian blur (Notice that the blur extends over the subject, creating a red fuzziness all the way around her - don't worry about it.)

NEXT STEPS ARE IMPORTANT

Select/reselect

Inverse the selection

Edit/Cut - this step removes the red fuzziness.

- I use this a lot to smooth out pixelated skies

Rad

This worked really well. I had tried to do this before you posted this but was having trouble keeping the blur off of the girl. I missed the Select/Reselect/Cut steps. Thanks Rad.

OP here is the results from Rad's tip using Gausian Blur set to 10 pixels (you might need more on the original). Some slight jpeg artifacts from saving as well.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
May 07, 2007 14:37 |  #5

oh! Many thanks to you guys. I figured there had to be a better way than simple clone tool. I actually tried a guassian blur but didn't have all the steps down. Again thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rammy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2004
Location: London, England
     
May 07, 2007 17:13 |  #6

In2Photos wrote in post #3166806 (external link)
This worked really well. I had tried to do this before you posted this but was having trouble keeping the blur off of the girl. I missed the Select/Reselect/Cut steps. Thanks Rad.

You could "save the selection" before the blur if it is a complicated selection so you can save time and guarantee to have the same selection as before. Nice tip Rad.


Gear | Surrey Wedding Photographer (external link) | Surrey Wedding Photographer Blog (external link) | London Architecture Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 07, 2007 18:03 |  #7

rammy wrote in post #3167685 (external link)
You could "save the selection" before the blur if it is a complicated selection so you can save time and guarantee to have the same selection as before. Nice tip Rad.

I did, but wasn't sure what to do with it after that.:( :)


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 07, 2007 18:05 |  #8

Spot healing brush should work fine too, quick and easy.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 07, 2007 18:07 |  #9

tim wrote in post #3167942 (external link)
Spot healing brush should work fine too, quick and easy.

I tried that too, but in this image there are too many spots. Including the dirt around her feet.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
May 07, 2007 18:10 |  #10

Radtech1 wrote in post #3166616 (external link)
AFTER doing the clone thing OR instead of it.

Magic Wand to select the red.

Copy - paste , which creates a new layer of red only

Gaussian blur (Notice that the blur extends over the subject, creating a red fuzziness all the way around her - don't worry about it.)

NEXT STEPS ARE IMPORTANT

Select/reselect

Inverse the selection

Edit/Cut - this step removes the red fuzziness.

- I use this a lot to smooth out pixelated skies

Rad


Thats Kick Ass!

Ive red this befor but when I tried it I used Ctrl-J to get the new layer but it wouldnt let me reselect the selection.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
May 07, 2007 20:59 as a reply to  @ Headcase650's post |  #11

Here is my take. (Now that I am at home),

I did just as I described as above, and it ended out very similar to what Mike, The Keeper demonstrated, but I did change two small things.

1) I did, in fact, use the clone tool first, to get as even a starting point as I could.

2) On the blurred layer, I erased back some around her feet (very soft edge, 20% opacity, back and forth). I did that to retain the shadows that she casts. It seems less "floating in space" this way - well, to me at least.

On, one thing about doing skies. You MUST be in 16 bit mode, otherwise you will get posterization.

Rad

Malvin: Yeah, but Jim, you're giving away all our best tricks!
Jim: Mister Potato Head! Mister Potato Head! They're not tricks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
May 07, 2007 21:08 |  #12

tim wrote in post #3167942 (external link)
Spot healing brush should work fine too, quick and easy.

IMPO - your over complicating things - as tim said Spot Healing brush would also be my tool of choice.

Take some time and learn how to use it - start off with a low opacity and you'll be all set.;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
May 07, 2007 21:22 |  #13

Originally I tried using the spot healing brush I was not satisfied. If you look at the original there are quite a lot of wrinkle marks in the background among other things. I felt like I was chasing myself using the healing tools alone. The Gaussian blur is much more even and takes care of some of the little imperfections seen in the background as well as some of the noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
May 08, 2007 04:01 |  #14

Hey, DavidPhoto, great lighting on this picture!
May I ask how you lit it?


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
May 08, 2007 07:37 |  #15

Thanks. I wasn't too crazy about the red background and this lighting seemed a little too much to me. We changed it around several times but if I recall correctly at this point we had two symmetric rim lights with large softboxes behind the subject on either side, and a small parabolic high up to camera right.
We ended up turning off the rim lights and just leaving the "streetlight" up high and it worked much better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,916 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Best way to PP out background wrinkles
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1804 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.