I have a few hundred photographs of Yellowstone, all shot as max res JPGs.
As I start to work with them, I'm seeing JPG artifacts pop up.
Is there a way to (a) eliminate them or (b) reduce their impact when working with these existing files?
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | May 08, 2007 16:34 | #1 I have a few hundred photographs of Yellowstone, all shot as max res JPGs. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 08, 2007 16:53 | #2 I've never seen JPG artifacts when I load high res images. Are you working on them as JPG, saving them, then opening them again? if you do then you need to save as psd or tiff files until you save as JPG as the last step of your workflow. Also save as Q12 JPGs. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Graystar Member 156 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Brooklyn, NY More info | removed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2007 21:00 | #4 tim wrote in post #3173553 I've never seen JPG artifacts when I load high res images. Are you working on them as JPG, saving them, then opening them again? if you do then you need to save as psd or tiff files until you save as JPG as the last step of your workflow. Also save as Q12 JPGs. I did an experiment a year or so ago when I loaded a jpg, then saved it, did it ten times, it took ages for JPG artifacts to show up. Thread here. Post a 100% crop to show what you mean if you like. I actually think that I saw that thread a while back; interesting finding which I completely forgot about -- History on the files isn't clear, because we had no clue what we were doing, so I think these are hit with something from Elements 4 in batch on the Mac which just might have thrashed them; I'll go dig up the out-of-camera stuff ASAP! Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2007 21:02 | #5 Graystar wrote in post #3173982 I don’t know what you’re seeing, but they’re not JPEG artifacts. You would never see JPEG artifacts as you're working with an image. JPEG artifacts manifest themselves after you’ve saved the file, closed it, and reload it from disk. If you’ve got JPEG artifacts then *that* is the time you’ll see them. JPEG artifacts are 8x8 blocks that occur from too much compression. Take a look at this page for pictures of JPEG artifacts. http://www.scantips.com/basics9jb.html Yep, you guys are both spot-on; quick look reveals I'm not seeing this at all, which begs the question what am I seeing -- I'll have to post a pic and explain. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 08, 2007 21:28 | #6 hortonsl62 wrote in post #3174664 [Bang] shot by mod Huh? Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2007 22:14 | #7 ^^ For posting something totally incorrect; what I'm seeing is not a JPG artifact, so I'm wasting everyone's time. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 08, 2007 22:18 | #8 Nah, people don't get told off for being wrong, otherwise i'd be long gone Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | May 08, 2007 22:25 | #9 Lets see what your seeing. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2007 23:08 | #10 ...1/2 way through tonight's shoot; hangin' it up for now. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | May 08, 2007 23:15 | #11 hortonsl62 wrote in post #3175080 ^^ For posting something totally incorrect; what I'm seeing is not a JPG artifact, so I'm wasting everyone's time. My money is on Posterization. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR "your nose is too big" 4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | May 09, 2007 06:36 | #12 It's always fun trying to guess what's wrong with a photo when (a) we haven't seen it; (b) the person who took the photo hasn't described the problem; and (c) we have no idea whatsoever what has been done to the photo in PP. www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | May 09, 2007 06:41 | #13 Converting your shots to 256 colour gifs will do that to ya....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | May 09, 2007 08:21 | #14 quick look reveals I'm not seeing this at all, which begs the question what am I seeing Maybe you're looking at a magnification other than 25-50-100%? FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 09, 2007 21:50 | #15 Oooo I'm in big trouble now -- I went to snag the image for posting, looked harder -- that old JPG was shot in "landscape mode" on the 30D, ISO 320, so now I think it is just ISO noise leftover. Before any PP on this one (embarrassing now, but it is what it is): This is going to be hard for a NOOB to describe, but in this scene there were whispy clouds, but the 'banded' or 'striped' horizontal lines are not rendering nicely at this time where the yellow is transitioning into blue. And to your points, all valid; yeah, it is hard to guess about a photo. You guys are great; thx for putting up with me. If you have the patience, any advice on how to approach PP on this one? The scene in real life was amazing; the blue went almost black at the top of the frame, the sunrise was brighter than this rendition. As I said, this is an important photo to my family from Yellowstone, and a dumb luck capture to catch those birds. ........back to the 200 keepers from last night's LAX. I wish I'd shot those in M. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2817 guests, 158 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||