Any idea if this will work with a Canon 350D (Rebel) because I looked at it but couldn't figure out where the sync cable went on my camera.

No PC socket on the XT. You need a hotshoe-pc adaptor.
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 18:19 | #121 rvds wrote in post #4142852 Any idea if this will work with a Canon 350D (Rebel) because I looked at it but couldn't figure out where the sync cable went on my camera. ![]() No PC socket on the XT. You need a hotshoe-pc adaptor. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lakiluno slightly jealous 2,895 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland) More info | Oct 17, 2007 18:22 | #122 Hi Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 18:32 | #123 I'm gaining a new appreciation for these Chinese wireless gizmos. I had assumed they were infra-red. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 18:33 | #124 lakiluno wrote in post #4143153 Hi The ebay radio triggers all use hotshoe-based transmitters, and so don't use a sync cable. There is an option to use one for cameras without hotshoes, but it doesn't really make sense to use it when you have a hotshoe. The 350D also doesn't have a PC Port. I had a small block made by hama that converted a hotshoe into a sync port. Again, it's not needed for these radio triggers, but if you are using a standard studio and PC Sync cables to trigger strobes, then it makes sense to get one. You can get them from 7dayshop.com. And now my own question. Does anyone know if these are compatible with the older v1? As far as I know, the mod that allowed you to use speedlights with the v1 was simply to add some sort of resistor into the circuit. Are the new ones using the same radio frequencies as the old ones? Leo I understand from the company site that the V1 and V2 are incompatible. I also hear there's a V2s model out there. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rvds Hatchling 9 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: London, UK More info | Oct 17, 2007 19:05 | #125 So basically if I just want to use it with a off camera Speedlight 580ex and my Canon 350D (Rebel) then it doesn't need a sync cable and it will work? ---
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lakiluno slightly jealous 2,895 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland) More info | Oct 17, 2007 20:04 | #126 rvds wrote in post #4143372 So basically if I just want to use it with a off camera Speedlight 580ex and my Canon 350D (Rebel) then it doesn't need a sync cable and it will work? yes - just buy a gadgetinfinity trigger and a gadgetinfinity receiver. Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 20:20 | #127 I just bought a transmitter receiver pair and three extra receivers from jiakgong-DIGITAL. $80 isn't too much of a gamble. I figure if they work then all is well. if they don't then I can write it off to experience and quit looking for alleged bargains. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lakiluno slightly jealous 2,895 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland) More info | Oct 17, 2007 20:30 | #128 I recommend you look at This seller Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 20:41 | #129 lakiluno wrote in post #4143822 I recommend you look at This seller Damn. He's got some nice kit. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ghms421 Senior Member 471 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Bethesda,MD More info | Oct 17, 2007 21:31 | #130 rhys wrote in post #4143903 Damn. He's got some nice kit. I might be after some stands and brolleys from him later. Any idea of whether this is a monolight or not? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk …7QQtcZphotoQQcmdZViewItem
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 17, 2007 21:42 | #131 Hang on... How can he say 180ws then continues lamp 50ws? I don't understand that at all. The GN of 48 looks reasonable. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ghms421 Senior Member 471 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Bethesda,MD More info | Oct 17, 2007 22:04 | #132 A continious lamp is a modeling light, which are not nearly as powerful as the flash itself. A little vivitar 285hv has close to 3x more power than that strobe.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lakiluno slightly jealous 2,895 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland) More info | Oct 18, 2007 06:38 | #133 rhys wrote in post #4144271 Hang on... How can he say 180ws then continues lamp 50ws? I don't understand that at all. The GN of 48 looks reasonable. Never mind - found an article on photo.net about it. Looks like the guy hasn't a clue what he's selling. The only issue here of lack of clue is the "s" after the W on the continuous lamp. Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lakiluno slightly jealous 2,895 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland) More info | Oct 18, 2007 06:40 | #134 ghms421 wrote in post #4144384 A continious lamp is a modeling light, which are not nearly as powerful as the flash itself. A little vivitar 285hv has close to 3x more power than that strobe. The vivitar guide number your using for that comparison is in feet rather than meters. The guide number for the strobe linked is in meters. Feet are approximately 3x meters... Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhys Dis-Membered 5,351 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 Location: Columbia SC More info | Oct 18, 2007 08:04 | #135 lakiluno wrote in post #4146095 The only issue here of lack of clue is the "s" after the W on the continuous lamp. Lorek uses those strobes - they are certainly not the most powerful, but they're not all together bad. I've bought some - I'll post a review when I get them.There is two lights here. A modelling lamp - a 50W standard bulb, and a 180Ws xenon flash tube. I believe that the expression Watt seconds basically means the flash uses 180 joules in a flash, but I'm probably wrong... ![]() Perhaps the guys at photo.net are a bit too caustic with their criticisms then. I liked the look of those lights. I had to slap myself afterwards to remind myself that I am a location photographer and not a studio photographer. Rhys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2465 guests, 91 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||