Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 May 2007 (Thursday) 15:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 F4 IS not White

 
PhotoJourno
High Plains Chimper
Avatar
5,681 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Lago, CA
     
May 10, 2007 17:37 |  #16

Sorry, State law prohibits me from misrepresenting the truth (see my message above).

All white lenses are in fact beige. This was also a surprise to me when I received my first lens, but it makes sense. The amount of dirts and wear would never look well on a purely white coated lens.

They do sell foam protecting cells for the Lens, I have seen camouflaged, and white. If there was a black one, I'd be buying it in a moment's notice.


--Mario
"Sensa luce non si vede nessuna cosa"--Lorenzo Ghiberti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
May 10, 2007 18:19 |  #17

circa wrote in post #3185038 (external link)
colour doesnt matter to me....as long as it takes damn good pictures! and you know it does!

What if it was pink and had a picture of a hot nude guy on it? :P


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowplay
Senior Member
Avatar
447 posts
Joined May 2006
     
May 10, 2007 19:09 |  #18

SunTsu wrote in post #3185734 (external link)
What if it was pink and had a picture of a hot nude guy on it? :P

he'd buy two




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grentz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,874 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Midwest, USA
     
May 10, 2007 19:13 |  #19

It's funny though how most of the web images look so white:
http://images.google.c​om …oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi (external link)


Search.TechIslands.com (external link) - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.com (external link) - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
May 10, 2007 19:15 |  #20

White balance and exposure are the same everywhere on the planet?


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoJourno
High Plains Chimper
Avatar
5,681 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Lago, CA
     
May 10, 2007 19:31 |  #21

cosworth wrote in post #3185977 (external link)
White balance and exposure are the same everywhere on the planet?

I am glad you asked that. According to Albert Einstein's first part of theTheory of Relativity, we have learned that 'Anywhere in the Universe is a good place to do Physics'.

Which is to say, the Universal laws of gravitation, acceleration, and so forth, apply anywhere in this universe, regardless of the speed. The requirement for cross reference, is that both places of calculation be at the same relative speed from eachother.

It is a misconception that E=mc2 is The Theory's main equation. In reality, this equation surfaced years after the first presentation of the Theory of Relativity.

It gets even more interesting after that. So to answer your question, yes, white balance and exposure are the same everywhere on the planet.

(Don't you hate it when someone answers your joke with a serious response?) :p


--Mario
"Sensa luce non si vede nessuna cosa"--Lorenzo Ghiberti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sonic ­ Infidel
Senior Member
Avatar
560 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 137
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
     
May 10, 2007 19:36 |  #22

Resale value be darned...I'm taking white-out to my 70-200/4 when it gets here...


--------------
Make more memories.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedjo
Senior Member
Avatar
318 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Behind EOS
     
May 10, 2007 19:55 as a reply to  @ Sonic Infidel's post |  #23

I guess there's some PP done of images on the internet.

When I look closely at the real lens, it's more like beige.


XTi, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8IS, 30mm f/1.4EX, Domke F-2, Contax T2, Olympus OM2 w/ 50mm, 24mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 10, 2007 19:57 as a reply to  @ thedjo's post |  #24

I find that these days the 'white' lenses are represented more accurately. If you look at B&H they appear as beige and there is no PP to make it look white. Amazon and many other sites also have better pictures now.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
May 10, 2007 19:59 as a reply to  @ Sonic Infidel's post |  #25

I have checked and you have indeed got a fake imitation and consequently poor copy.

Owing to my philanthropic nature and for purely altruistic reasons I have enclosed a cheque for $200 to relieve you of this awful con job. I will of course pay any postage to myself.

Please put the generous offer of $200 toward a REAL copy (white) and I will put your pathetic copy on my old 350D for use in muddy conditions.

Yours truely

J.P.Getty Esq.


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shybull
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
290 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 478
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
     
May 10, 2007 20:08 as a reply to  @ cookie99's post |  #26

It's funny, I've read a lot of info and forums and have never heard anybody call the "L" lenses anything but white. So I was surprised when I recieved mine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,907 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
70-200 F4 IS not White
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1358 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.