Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 May 2007 (Thursday) 21:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PP and saving for printing?

 
bacchanal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
May 10, 2007 21:54 |  #1

Is there some sort of method or accecpted guidlines for preparing a digital file for printing? I've pretty much got a workflow down for saving for the web, but I really don't have a clue as to any best practice guidelines for preparing an output file for printing.

I currently archive my (keeper) RAW files, and for any file I edit I save a full res jpeg for printing and a web res/sharpened jpeg. Is there any special editing that I should do to the full res jpeg to prepare it for printing? I save in sRGB and all that, but I'm just wondering if anyone has any tips. Compared to a web file should I be using more or less sharpening, noise reduction, contrast, etc.? How does sharpening at full resolution translate to an 8x12 vs. a 4x6?

I've generally been happy with my prints so far, but I used to be happy with my p&s snapshots too. I just want to make sure that I'm not making some mistake that will make me look back a couple years from now and wonder what I was thinking.


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
May 10, 2007 22:11 |  #2

save at highest quality, and 300 dpi for print. Most of the shots I take, I print. I generally use a USM of 150,.3,0 or up to 200, .3, 0. Seems to do the trick. I don't do noise reduction..I use a middle setting on the noise reduction my printer has (Epson R1800). Generally my shots aren't very noisy, though. Contrast depends on the shot. I don't do any less to a shot that I know won't be printed bigger than 4x6. I do my best on all of them. It's just insurance.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mukund2
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 11, 2007 01:07 |  #3

Use of NIk sharp pro takes this decision auto.


Regards,
Mukund

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 11, 2007 03:59 |  #4

Almost everything I print is 27.7x40 cm / 11.5x16 in. (A3 with 1 cm. border). I uprez to 360 ppi, the native dpi of Epson printers, since my resampling routine is much better than the driver's. ( I also don't reccomend letting the driver do any sharpening or noise reduction or color management. The only thing I let the driver do is bit depth reduction, i.e., I send the file to it in 16 bits so that the on-the-fly conversion to the printer/paper color space is done in 16.) My working space is Chrome 2000 which is just slightly larger than my printer/paper space. I sharpen before uprezzing and then again after. Because ink drops spread - how much depends primarily on the paper, but also on the printer's drop size and shape - a print will be less sharp than the monitor display. Therefore, you should sharpen more for printing, until it looks slightly oversharpened at 100%. If you are printing from a program that allows soft proofing it is probably worthwhile using it and then adjusting contrast and saturation accordingly.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bacchanal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
May 11, 2007 06:29 as a reply to  @ tzalman's post |  #5

Thanks for the insights. I typically use a jpeg compression of 8-9 progressive. Is that adequate, or should I use less compression?


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
May 11, 2007 07:43 |  #6

For printing, the more data the better. Think of it this way. If the original file for the photo is around 23 megabytes (23,000,000 bytes) in TIFF and you scale it down to JPEG. Your scaled down file ends up to be around 1.9 megabytes (1,900,000). Thats 21.1 megabytes (21,100,000 bytes) worth of information in the photo gone. Lose the compression.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,350 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
PP and saving for printing?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1112 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.