august23 wrote in post #3192399
I've been looking over my stuff. And as I prepare for my Italy trip, I said to myself when I was holding the 10-22, "when the hell am I going to use this after Italy?" I shoot a lot of low light, night time, and portrait stuff. The 10-22 doesn't excell in any of those areas.
If you're trying to get scenic pictures in narrow, winding streets --- and there's a lot of those in Europe & Asia --- the 10-22 is a godsend. It can allow you to take architectural pictures without having to tilt your perspective just to fit everyting into the frame. Internet galleries are already riddled with a bunch of ugly looking vacation photos of beautiful architecture shown from a tilted perspective.
And the 10-22 lens is not a bad low light lens. At the wide end of the zoom, you can handhold it down to 1/15 sec @ ISO 1600 @ f3.5. Strictly in terms of hand holdability indoors, it's similar to the 35 f2 lens. That lens would require a minimum 1/60 sec shutter speed @ f2 (-2 stops shutter speed, +2 stops aperture, compared to the 10-22).
I also use the 10-22 a lot for half and full body portraits, with the camera in landscape orientation. It requires careful framing to minimize distortion, but in the right hands it definitely works. It's an excellent way to take pictures of a person and show a lot of the environment. It's the opposite of what a portrait lens would typically do, which usually blurs the background & isolates the subject. You can take a portrait of someone with a 135L lens, and it really wouldn't matter if you were in Italy, in China, or in the backyard of your home in Cleveland. For that reason, I prefer a wide angle lens for portraits in exotic places.
.