Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 May 2007 (Friday) 23:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What other reasons to keep my 10-22?

 
august23
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
May 11, 2007 23:09 |  #1

I've been looking over my stuff. And as I prepare for my Italy trip, I said to myself when I was holding the 10-22, "when the hell am I going to use this after Italy?" I shoot a lot of low light, night time, and portrait stuff. The 10-22 doesn't excell in any of those areas. As a matter of fact, I only considered this lens FOR my Italy trip. So any reasons you guys could think of to keep it? Or should I put it up in the FS section when I get back from my trip to Italy?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muggles
Member
63 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 11, 2007 23:36 |  #2

august23 wrote in post #3192399 (external link)
I've been looking over my stuff. And as I prepare for my Italy trip, I said to myself when I was holding the 10-22, "when the hell am I going to use this after Italy?" I shoot a lot of low light, night time, and portrait stuff. The 10-22 doesn't excell in any of those areas.


If you're trying to get scenic pictures in narrow, winding streets --- and there's a lot of those in Europe & Asia --- the 10-22 is a godsend. It can allow you to take architectural pictures without having to tilt your perspective just to fit everyting into the frame. Internet galleries are already riddled with a bunch of ugly looking vacation photos of beautiful architecture shown from a tilted perspective.

And the 10-22 lens is not a bad low light lens. At the wide end of the zoom, you can handhold it down to 1/15 sec @ ISO 1600 @ f3.5. Strictly in terms of hand holdability indoors, it's similar to the 35 f2 lens. That lens would require a minimum 1/60 sec shutter speed @ f2 (-2 stops shutter speed, +2 stops aperture, compared to the 10-22).

I also use the 10-22 a lot for half and full body portraits, with the camera in landscape orientation. It requires careful framing to minimize distortion, but in the right hands it definitely works. It's an excellent way to take pictures of a person and show a lot of the environment. It's the opposite of what a portrait lens would typically do, which usually blurs the background & isolates the subject. You can take a portrait of someone with a 135L lens, and it really wouldn't matter if you were in Italy, in China, or in the backyard of your home in Cleveland. For that reason, I prefer a wide angle lens for portraits in exotic places.


.


EOS 400D
35L + 85 + 10-22 + 17-50 + 70-200L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
May 11, 2007 23:48 |  #3

IMO...It's really nice to have an UWA handy. There's just no way to substitute it. An UWA lens adds a lot to the ability to be creative. If you sell it.....my guess would be that you would eventually regret it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 11, 2007 23:51 |  #4

I have 12mm on a 1.3x. I seldom use it. But when I need it, I'm glad I have it.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
May 12, 2007 00:48 |  #5

Even though I didn't use my Tokina much, but after moved up to the 1D, I kinda miss it.


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 12, 2007 01:01 |  #6

4x4rock wrote in post #3192745 (external link)
Even though I didn't use my Tokina much, but after moved up to the 1D, I kinda miss it.

I went through the same withdrawal after selling my 30D and Tokina even though I rarely used the latter. I was left with just the 24-70 and the 70-200 on a 1D. When I saw the deal on the Sigma (the FF compatible 12-24mm) I jumped on it fast.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thekid24
pro-zack-lee
Avatar
8,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Oklahoma City,OK
     
May 12, 2007 01:08 |  #7

Or should I put it up in the FS section when I get back from my trip to Italy?

Yes do that

*waits in the FS forum*

:D:D:D:D


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,494 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
     
May 12, 2007 01:10 |  #8

only you know the real answer to your question.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
May 12, 2007 01:32 |  #9

cdifoto wrote in post #3192788 (external link)
I went through the same withdrawal after selling my 30D and Tokina even though I rarely used the latter. I was left with just the 24-70 and the 70-200 on a 1D. When I saw the deal on the Sigma (the FF compatible 12-24mm) I jumped on it fast.

Haha... one more lens to add to the list. And here, I'm saving for the 300/2.8 which probably will take forever. :)


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 12, 2007 01:54 as a reply to  @ sonnyc's post |  #10

If I were only taking one lens with me to Italy it would be my 10-22. In fact I shot 90% of my trip there in January with that lens. (I also had my 17-55 and 85mm with me)

http://www.dcresource.​com …php?p=222375&po​stcount=50 (external link)
http://www.dcresource.​com ….php?p=196869&p​ostcount=3 (external link)
http://www.dcresource.​com ….php?p=196866&p​ostcount=1 (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
May 12, 2007 09:01 |  #11

For pictures of teddy bears ;)


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48474
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
May 12, 2007 09:04 |  #12

It's not widely talked about, but one thing that I was very impressed with the 10-22 is performance in lowlight. No matter where I'm travelling, I'm taking this baby with me everywhere!



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freakeystyley34
Senior Member
400 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
May 12, 2007 09:55 |  #13

don't sell it, give it to me! :)


Canon 30d, 17-55 2.8 IS, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, Contax 139 and Zeiss 50mm 1.7
(semi) realistic wish-list: 10-22, 580EX.
Unrealistic wish-list: 24L, 35L, 85L, 5dmk2 :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reminisce
Senior Member
Avatar
617 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 12, 2007 10:04 |  #14

I've actually used my Sigma 10-22 on my last two photo shoots. Its extremely useful for doing full body shots in a tight area, or putting someone in the corner of a wall and going wide, and so on.

It came very handy most recently in one of my last shoots, where I shot on location, not knowing the model's apartment was insanely small. So I set up my backdrop and light in a corner, and pulled out the 10-22. Looking at the photos, you'd guess I was at least 10 feet away from her, and she was 6 feet away from the backdrop. Try 3 and 3 :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
May 12, 2007 13:05 |  #15

Thanks guys. I think after my trip I'll see how often I use it and make my decision from there. By the way calico, it's a TIGER, not a TEDDY BEAR! :p



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,750 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
What other reasons to keep my 10-22?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
794 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.