I was out just playin' with my new 100-400 lens. Evening (after work) so reasonable light. Hand-held first attempts with the longes lens I've ever had. Took this shot of two pigeons (sorry no ducks!) and notice that the bird at the back is in focus Whilst the one in front is badly off but the focus point was dead on it. So, I think I've got the dreaded back focus problem.
http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4321444
Crop
http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4322060
So this morning I go out and take more shots, on a sturdy tripod reasonable light and it seems spot on. Fucus point in centre of part of frame marked. Questions will come later.....
http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4321443
Crop
http://images.fotopic.net/?id=4322059
I don't want to do no ruler test. It makes me feel too geeky (:oops
and I just don't have the patience. I tried once before with a 50mm lens and it took me all day and I still wasn't any clearer.The pigeon shot freaked me. The bench shot made me happy. So question: If my 10D isn't back-focussing what happened? It isn't camera shake 'cos some areas are lovely and sharp (pigeon shot).
By the way Pigeon shot: ISO 200, F5.6 1/250 Focal Lenght 330 mm
Evaluative Metering
Bench Shot: ISO 200, f5.6, 1/100 Focal Length 400mm
Shot in RAW a little sharpening and exposure compensation in C1.
Oh, and I was roughly the same distance away from the subject both times.
Thanks
Martin

