Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 May 2004 (Friday) 06:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

more serious post - help with focus 2 pics

 
martcol
Senior Member
Avatar
866 posts
Joined May 2002
Location: Kent, UK
     
May 07, 2004 06:09 |  #1

I was out just playin' with my new 100-400 lens. Evening (after work) so reasonable light. Hand-held first attempts with the longes lens I've ever had. Took this shot of two pigeons (sorry no ducks!) and notice that the bird at the back is in focus Whilst the one in front is badly off but the focus point was dead on it. So, I think I've got the dreaded back focus problem.

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net/?id=4321444

Crop


IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net/?id=4322060


So this morning I go out and take more shots, on a sturdy tripod reasonable light and it seems spot on. Fucus point in centre of part of frame marked. Questions will come later.....

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net/?id=4321443

Crop


IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net/?id=4322059

I don't want to do no ruler test. It makes me feel too geeky (:oops:) and I just don't have the patience. I tried once before with a 50mm lens and it took me all day and I still wasn't any clearer.

The pigeon shot freaked me. The bench shot made me happy. So question: If my 10D isn't back-focussing what happened? It isn't camera shake 'cos some areas are lovely and sharp (pigeon shot).


By the way Pigeon shot: ISO 200, F5.6 1/250 Focal Lenght 330 mm
Evaluative Metering

Bench Shot: ISO 200, f5.6, 1/100 Focal Length 400mm

Shot in RAW a little sharpening and exposure compensation in C1.

Oh, and I was roughly the same distance away from the subject both times.

Thanks

Martin

"All photographs are accurate. None of them is the truth."
Richard Avedon
www.imagesandwords.org​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
May 07, 2004 08:33 |  #2

The 10D focus issue can be very frustrating. Sometimes focus is dead on and other times it seems off. Have you tried manualy focusing and seeing where the Focus Light comes on? It seems that whenever I do that MF and AF are the same. I was about to send my 10D in for calibration, till I took a series of shots with the 50 f/1.4 and they were dead on. My 70-200 f/2.8 is going in to be checked. I guess the only way to know is to do one of the focus tests with all your lenses.
Good Luck,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sp00g3
Member
171 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
May 07, 2004 08:39 |  #3

scottbergerphoto wrote:
The 10D focus issue can be very frustrating. Sometimes focus is dead on and other times it seems off. Have you tried manualy focusing and seeing where the Focus Light comes on? It seems that whenever I do that MF and AF are the same. I was about to send my 10D in for calibration, till I took a series of shots with the 50 f/1.4 and they were dead on. My 70-200 f/2.8 is going in to be checked. I guess the only way to know is to do one of the focus tests with all your lenses.
Good Luck,
Scott

umm.. Were you completely zoomed in at 400mm? Reason I ask even at f5.6 DOF is very shallow at 200 - 400 mm. Why don't you try increasing the f to 8 where the lense will be at its sharpest? Dont forget the DOF preview...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 07, 2004 12:06 |  #4

When your lens is heading in the direction of "wide open", then DOF gets very critical, and DOF preview becomes much more important. If the target area of focus has worse contrast than some place just outside of the target, then that makes it harder for the contrast sensor function of autofocus to work. In other words, if you shoot at a pattern of black and white lines, the focus should be more accurate to judge as compared to a blob of dark gray and light gray lines. That is what makes the ruler test good.

Some of you have seen a digital exposure target. It has areas of black, gray, and white, and you use that to check out your histogram spikes. Well, it also has a lot of contrast, so it makes a good autofocus target as well.

Of course, I am too cheap to buy such a target, but I made my own. I took a small piece of white foam board for white. Then I had some 18% gray tape that I made a horizontal stripe with. Then I had some total black tape that I made a vertical stripe with. I use that for exposure checks and also for autofocus checks.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Haifidelity
Member
197 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
May 07, 2004 12:14 |  #5

Your 10D Focussed accurately, just not where you intended it too. I don't think my 10D has any focussing problems, but I do believe it can focus on objects that I don't intend to be in focus. With a smaller than full frame viewfinder, it's hard to tell what's in focus sometimes.

I wouldn't sweat it. If this was consistently doing this, I would worry.

-hza




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maderito
Goldmember
Avatar
1,336 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Southern New England
     
May 07, 2004 14:03 |  #6

How are you sure that the 10D selected the center focus point on the pigeon image?

There is very little contrast on the bodies of the pigeons. It's quite possible that the 10D right-of-center focus point was automatically selected -- possibly in the wing feathers of the bird on the right where there is more contrast. (As you probably know, AF relies on image contrast.)

Ducks are probably more predictable. :) :)


Woody Lee
http://pbase.com/mader​ito (external link)
http://maderito.fotki.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
May 07, 2004 14:16 |  #7

Ditto...You need to be at f8 or higher to bring both those birds into focus. At f5.6 your dof is short. The closer you are to the subject, the worse it will be...or better, depending on what you are trying to achieve...


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
May 07, 2004 16:09 |  #8

Yep.. I'll throw in another vote for DOF.. f/5.6 may not be an incredibly fast f stop, but at 400mm you wind up with a very shallow depth of field..

When using my 100-400, I usually make sure the camera is in Av mode and force the lens to higher f/stops.. (As others have mentioned.. Around f/8 )

Another thing to watch out for is motion blur.. Setting the stop to f/8 might drop your shutter speed to 1/125th or slower.. At that speed, perky little birds and other fast moving targets won't come out sharp. In this case, you'll have to use a higher ISO..

Who said photography was easy :-) :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
more serious post - help with focus 2 pics
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1904 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.