Anyone have time to give a run down on the settings they are using?
Pekka?? Cyber?? Belendemo?? Anyone??
GenEOS Senior Member 740 posts Joined Jan 2003 Location: Pearland, Texas More info | May 07, 2004 11:04 | #1 Anyone have time to give a run down on the settings they are using? Daniel Tunstall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | May 07, 2004 11:30 | #2 Updated with the settings my camera still has on the today, May 2013. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scottbergerphoto Cream of the Crop 5,429 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA More info | May 07, 2004 13:13 | #3 I'm currently using all the shooting modes and metering modes, having a good old time. Cf.4-1 + Cfn. 18-2 is sweet! One World, One Voice Against Terror,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2004 15:32 | #4 What are ya'll setting these to? Daniel Tunstall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scottbergerphoto Cream of the Crop 5,429 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA More info | May 10, 2004 16:28 | #5 Color space: Adobe RGB One World, One Voice Against Terror,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 10, 2004 20:08 | #6
Daniel Tunstall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dan9 Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined May 2004 More info | May 11, 2004 10:25 | #7 You might want to use downsampled JPGs (M1 or M2)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator More info | May 11, 2004 12:51 | #8 I shoot RAW (only RAW, convert with one beta software). The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skiphoto Member 55 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: North carolina More info | May 11, 2004 13:16 | #9 Settings
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garethhhhh Senior Member 661 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Cambridge, UK More info | May 11, 2004 13:18 | #10 the link doesn't work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | May 11, 2004 14:13 | #11 I'm havig underexposure problems as well.. but the AF is the best I've used (including the 1D) GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scottbergerphoto Cream of the Crop 5,429 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA More info | May 11, 2004 19:00 | #12 For what it's worth, increasing contrast in the camera reduces the dynamic range available. For that reason, two camps seem to have risen, those favoring increasing contrast +1 and those favoring leaving it at 0 and adjusting in PS. I've been getting good results leaving it standard and using curves to increase contrast. One World, One Voice Against Terror,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | May 12, 2004 07:49 | #13 I agree re: leaving it to PS for curves/levels adjust as well.. However the sugestion to bump up thse parameters in Camera was for users who want zero post processing. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | May 12, 2004 09:17 | #14 Just returned from shooting a waterski event in Nor Cal and was dismayed to say the least when viewing the first images out of the 1D Mk11. They were very underexposed and the focus was way off I hope that the problem isn't with your new camera. On the other hand, we all live & learn - 2 things for skiphoto: FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2004 10:34 | #15 Here's a dumb question. If you set the parameters off from O's, this only effects the jpeg.....So if you shoot RAW + Large jpeg, will the changes in settings effect the jpeg or not, because you are shooting RAW. Daniel Tunstall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1460 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||