StewartR wrote in post #3202760
I use Photoshop Elements 5, and I'm reasonably satisfied with the built-in RAW converter. It gets the job done.
@
davidcrebelxt: I'd be interested to know what I'm missing.
Check out this page, although showing screenshots from ACR 3.1 I think its still about the same, correct me if I'm wrong.
http://www.bioneural.net …n-acr-31-in-pse-3-vs-cs2/
You'll notice that there are tabs in the CS2 version of ACR, while Elements has only a single panel... the "full" ACR includes tools for dealing with fringing (chromatic abberation), curves for better tweaking of contrast, and Calibrate tab for adjusting ACR to your Camera (ACR can't read the calibration that's apparently embeded into the RAW file, while Canon's software can... each person's mileage may vary, but for me this causes some severe color shifts... reds go orange, and an overall greenish tint to the image.)
I'm not positive about how it works in CS2's ACR... but in Lightroom I can set a presets, to apply to a single image or a group of images... (ie: could set a calibration preset, and first apply that to all my .CR2's to give me a good starting place to edit them.) Plus I have recovery slider for highlight recovery, more color sliders, can crop and rotate/straighten in RAW, remove dust spots, and more.
Elements ACR reminds me of the limited RAW controls in Zoombrowser, except that in Zoombrowser the colors look good to start with, whereas in Elements ACR the initial RAW conversion always looked like crap until I did some heavy tweaking. I just found DPP to do much better, and in less time... and now using Lightroom (since I've got a halfway decent calibration preset, finally) I'm enjoying the extra tools there too. Lightroom's been described as ACR on steroids, as far as the develop side of things go... but from what I've heard it's fairly close to ACR in CS3 as far as image adjustments go.