Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 May 2004 (Friday) 19:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I really want a Canon 100-400 L

 
RbnDave
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Joined Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, California
     
May 07, 2004 19:26 |  #1

I took a walk in the woods today and saw these deer. The photo was taken with my Sigma 70-200 and a 2x teleconverter. Lately the sigma and teleconverter combo have become my walk around lens. I think it is time to step up and make the big 100-400 L purchase. I am just not happy with the results I am getting. With my sigma and tele it is hard to nail the focus and even when the focus is correct the images lack sharpness and contrast. I want that Canon L pop.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


Really no point to this post. Just trying to talk myself into spending $1400 on a toy.

Dave

California Photographer (external link) -- My Photo Blog (external link) -- Free Photography Lessons (external link) -- Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daaaveman
Member
249 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
May 07, 2004 19:36 |  #2

The folks here are always happy to help you spend money......Go for it. Explain to the wife that you have to buy L lenses because they last forever and do great on maintaining resale value so it's a great investment in the long run.


Canon 40d, some lenses, lots of odd accessories - some of which I never use.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angst911
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined May 2004
     
May 07, 2004 19:42 |  #3

I love my 100-400 so far.... considering one of the extender deals for bird photography




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IanD
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
5,342 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 463
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Lancaster, Ontario
     
May 07, 2004 19:50 |  #4

Do not even think about it. Pick up the phone, hop in the car, but just order one.

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/image/27216472.jpg
It is an awsome deer/duck/goose/Justab​ird lens. One of the heavier walk-arounds but nothing a strong man and a small donkey cannot handle :lol:

Ian (®Feathers & Fur)
Have You Hugged Your Mallard Today?
More Images- (external link)My Gear
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angst911
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined May 2004
     
May 07, 2004 19:56 |  #5

it's also pretty damned good for whatever you'd call this type:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


that's resized.... full size (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RbnDave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Joined Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, California
     
May 07, 2004 21:17 |  #6

IanD

Not only is your deer photo sharper than mine, but the deer itself looks better than my subjects. The deer here in Ohio are in the middle of losing their winter coat. Maybe if I took their photo with a 100-400 L they would look less mangy.

Dave


California Photographer (external link) -- My Photo Blog (external link) -- Free Photography Lessons (external link) -- Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cgratti
Lord_Malone, your still a newb...
Avatar
3,315 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES
     
May 07, 2004 21:20 |  #7

RbnDave wrote:
IanD

Not only is your deer photo sharper than mine, but the deer itself looks better than my subjects. The deer here in Ohio are in the middle of losing their winter coat. Maybe if I took their photo with a 100-400 L they would look less mangy.

Dave


I think its just something in the water in Ohio, not the lens...LOL...the deer here in Pa look the same all year, mangy



Canon 30D

Canon 10D
Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Apple iMac G5



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EoSD30fReAk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Netherlands
     
May 08, 2004 03:14 |  #8

I'm with Ian

don't hesitate just go out and buy it!
you'll love it :P


Photography is my way to relax

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
May 08, 2004 05:53 |  #9

EF 100-400's are relatively cheap now, in the low $1200 and below.
I'd love to post some pictures, but I really don't think they're worthy of
here or FM. Anyway, any person in relatively decent physical shape
should not have a problem carrying this lens. I've been using mine for a couple of weeks now and I don't even bother with a monpod. Tripod comes
in handy for low light, though, I do realize. The best thing about owning
a 100-400 L? It has cured my anxiety attacks over having only an 18-55mm
kit lens to shoot with. I'm actually using money for necessities again.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IanD
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
5,342 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 463
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Lancaster, Ontario
     
May 08, 2004 06:01 |  #10

RbnDave wrote:
IanD

Not only is your deer photo sharper than mine, but the deer itself looks better than my subjects. The deer here in Ohio are in the middle of losing their winter coat. Maybe if I took their photo with a 100-400 L they would look less mangy.

Dave

Dave,
This was shot in February when the dee have beautiful thick winter coats. You should see them now. Super mangy. They sort of look like king sized porcupines :lol:


Ian (®Feathers & Fur)
Have You Hugged Your Mallard Today?
More Images- (external link)My Gear
flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RonR
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
     
May 08, 2004 06:30 |  #11

100-400 IS handheld
http://fototime.com/48​8800F4D081ECC/standard​.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
May 08, 2004 14:19 |  #12

Ok. Here goes nothing. One of my better takes.
Done with a 100-400 L IS USM. I hope it does the lens justice and
if not would not mind knowing why.

http://flashdaddee.com …read.php?s=&thr​eadid=9858 (external link)


If someone could tell me how to get my image to display here, I'd certainly appreciate it. Thanks.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dn7elson
Senior Member
819 posts
Joined Apr 2002
     
May 08, 2004 14:29 |  #13

rick barclay wrote:
If someone could tell me how to get my image to display here, I'd certainly appreciate it. Thanks.

Just add the "

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE
" after the URL if the webhost where you have the image allows direct linking. I'm guessing that yours does not.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
May 08, 2004 16:16 |  #14

I was in the shower thinking about what might be wrong when I realized
I was trying to post an image of a thread instead of an image. Silly me.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RbnDave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,077 posts
Joined Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, California
     
May 08, 2004 18:34 |  #15

Why must you torture me with your crisp images?

I am trying to be good and wait to purchase the 100-400 L. I really need to save my money so I can pay for a Boeing 737 type rating. You see, I am a pilot at US Airways Express and I am trying to get hired by Southwest Airlines. They require you to have a 737 type rating before getting hired and that costs about $8000. Buying a 100-400 will put me a couple months behind in my savings. I don't know why I look at this forum so much. You guys are a terrible influence. Should I squander my future on L glass?


California Photographer (external link) -- My Photo Blog (external link) -- Free Photography Lessons (external link) -- Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,293 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
I really want a Canon 100-400 L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1804 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.