![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
luckyart60 Goldmember 1,097 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2003 Location: DOHA QATAR More info | May 13, 2007 07:03 | #1
John A Thompson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 13, 2007 07:05 | #2 Sorry message posted. This is a first sighting for me of this Tern in Arabia. Not shown in my refernce book on Birds of Middle East. Can anyone please ID. John A Thompson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 13, 2007 07:20 | #3 May be a wing shot will help to ID
John A Thompson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davewalters Senior Member 458 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Account inactive please delete More info | May 13, 2007 07:56 | #4 Just red crosses again John - taking the actual link from the x's gives a page not found.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davewalters Senior Member 458 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Account inactive please delete More info | May 13, 2007 09:23 | #5 Had a look at your website and you have two undidentified terns in there. The latest are White-cheeked and the earliest Lesser Crested. Hope that helps.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2007 08:06 | #6 Hi Dave Thanks for your help with the ID. I will try to post again
John A Thompson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | May 15, 2007 08:32 | #7 John, nice shots. In my books, this looks like an Arctic Tern. It says they make one of the worlds most spectacular migration from their summer grounds in arctic Canada, across the atlantic and down Africa to the Antarctic, then come back North along the coast of South and North America. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davewalters Senior Member 458 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Account inactive please delete More info | May 15, 2007 10:21 | #8 Nice logic Mitch and you are very close, all three could be considered confusion species but they are definitely White-cheeked Terns.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkEvan Senior Member 883 posts Joined Oct 2006 More info | Not being able to contribute to the "what are they?" question, I can say though that I like the shot, pretty birds as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | May 15, 2007 10:27 | #10 Dave, the truth is, my books are almost worthless for ID purposes. I can't believe how off they can be and the pictures are terrible. They really need to scout POTN for ID images instead of using the crappy ones they use now. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davewalters Senior Member 458 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Account inactive please delete More info | May 15, 2007 11:06 | #11 Tell me about it - the standard run of the mill id book is terrible and causes more harm than good. For example White-cheeked Tern. Some books will show it with almost no dusky underparts and some with way too much and Arctic Tern suffers from similar artistic licence. I'm also very interested in Dragonflies, Damselflies, Mammals, Reptiles, Butterflies and Amphibians - to be honest I'd be lost without a camera, even here in the UK with our limited number of species identification of anything is still not straight forward!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | May 15, 2007 11:41 | #12 I subscribed to the Wisconsin birding list awhile back, and the misidentification isn't confined to just books. Even the experts can't agree when they have a perfectly clear picture of a bird in question. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2914 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||