Tom,
I have to say that this is a fantastic picture
Seriously, great results.Today I spent another couple of hours on testing. (My wife looks at me like if I were going mad. I wonder why... It cannot be the target charts hanging on every wall in our aprtment
)The results varied from bad front focus to almost okay. User erros (me
), poor light conditions, distance from the target, target properties all can affect the outcome. Anyway, here's the result with 50mm 1.8 at 1.8:
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
And another one:
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Thanks! I appreciate it, and the lens does as well. Frankly, I was a little surprised at how well it did, considering how I struggle with it sometimes in that very shallow DOF. 
The red stripe really pulled that focus into the middle! One of the problems with using the bare chart is that you have quite a few hash-marks that the camera can potentially lock focus on. Here's a link to a shot of the focus sensor arrangement overlaid with the focus indicator boxes:
http://www.pbase.com/image/18920257![]()
The reason I used an external focus point was to avoid the camera locking on to the wrong thing (and this is especially true in low light). That center cross is quite big, and for some reason, the 50's like to grab focus on the wrong subject sometimes. They're accurate, but incorrect if you know what I mean.
Check out Pekka's test setup here:
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=10526

