try posting a screenshot of it being edited on LR, and then the exported pic.
SilverOnemi Senior Member 692 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Portugal More info | Jul 26, 2007 21:53 | #16 try posting a screenshot of it being edited on LR, and then the exported pic. gripped 7D/40D | 70-200 F4 L IS | 50 1.4 USM | wigma 10 20 | tamron 17 50 | canon 1.4 TC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greygoose Senior Member 437 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2005 Location: New York aka Noo Yawk More info | Jul 27, 2007 05:34 | #17 i am sorry if this suggestion was already covered. Canon 1D Mark IIn, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/4, 580ex, 580ex II, 580ex II, vivitar 285, tripod, android
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greygoose Senior Member 437 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2005 Location: New York aka Noo Yawk More info | Jul 27, 2007 05:44 | #18 the color profiles are probably being discarded. Canon 1D Mark IIn, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/4, 580ex, 580ex II, 580ex II, vivitar 285, tripod, android
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boxerjess Junior Member 28 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Evansville Indiana More info | Sorry to dig a topic up from the grave - I will be quick though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustinSegura Junior Member 23 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Apr 09, 2008 04:21 | #20 Same problem here. Looks great in LR but once exported i lose some color and detail. usually darker than in LR. Pics still look better than the original, so i cant complain that much.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boxerjess Junior Member 28 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Evansville Indiana More info | Well, mine don't look better at all. I really want to be able to use LR but if I can't save the file even remotely close to what it looks like in LR than it is pointless.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VictoriaBampton Goldmember 1,367 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2007 Location: Southampton, UK More info | Apr 09, 2008 11:25 | #22 Everybody, and I do mean EVERYBODY, should be able to at least EXPORT a file that looks the same outside of LR as it does inside. Printing is another ballgame, but let's try one thing at a time....
9. If it still doesn't match, report back with your Photoshop colour settings. So far so good? 10. Now open your 2 files (ProPhoto16 & sRGB8 ) into Windows Picture Viewer or another non-colour-managed application (web browser etc). The ProPhoto16 one looks grotty, right? That's because it's not colour managed. The sRGB8 one is as close as you'll get to a match in a non colour managed program. If you're still having trouble after all this, next port of call is corrupted monitor profiles (LR uses the monitor profile differently to most other programs), or dodgy graphics card drivers. But one step at a time...... Victoria
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rnourse Member 199 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Jun 08, 2008 11:04 | #23 I guess the OP got it resolved... would be nice to know what the problem turned out to be...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NightHawk Member 51 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Kunsan AB, ROK (S. Korea) More info |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Sep 07, 2009 09:39 | #25 Did you follow the steps Victoria gave? "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NightHawk Member 51 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Kunsan AB, ROK (S. Korea) More info | Ok so I tried however this is the result I am getting, the same... First picture is the picture I am wanting... (Sorry for the huge pics) - Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Sep 07, 2009 19:59 | #27 Internet explorer is not color managed, so it will display wrong. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NightHawk Member 51 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Kunsan AB, ROK (S. Korea) More info | Sep 07, 2009 20:08 | #28 René Damkot wrote in post #8601707 Internet explorer is not color managed, so it will display wrong. Not sure what the "ProPhotoRGB" text means, since you are showing the same image twice? ACR 3.7 will not open CR2 files from your 50D unless you convert them to DNG first. I see hardly any point in doing that, since LR2 is a way better raw converter then ACR prior to 4.6 ACR FAQ Have a read in the link from my sig, or here It doesnt matter if I am displaying it in internet explorer, it shows the same in whatever I view it in other than LR2. The ProPhoto RGB and sRGB is the two images I showed them in comparing the two as Victoria explained. I am still lost but will give what you mentioned a look at and try some other things if it tells me to. - Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Sep 07, 2009 20:15 | #29 Night Hawk wrote in post #8601760 It doesnt matter if I am displaying it in internet explorer, it shows the same in whatever I view it in other than LR2. The ProPhoto RGB and sRGB is the two images I showed them in comparing the two as Victoria explained. I am still lost but will give what you mentioned a look at and try some other things if it tells me to. Okay. Step by step. Victoria Bampton wrote in post #5293201 1. Find a file a like. You're going to be looking at it for a while! We're going to call it 'Original' here for identification purposes. 2. Export 'Original', set to ProPhotoRGB 16bit. We'll call that 'ProPhoto16'. 3. Import that file (ProPhoto16) into Lightroom. Does it look identical to the original? 4. Export 'Original', set to sRGB 8bit. We'll call that 'sRGB8'. 5. Import that file (sRGB8 ) into Lightroom. Does it look identical to the original? There may be slight differences due to the fact you're working with a much smaller colour space. 6. If they don't match, report back.... 7. Now let's pick another program to view the file... 8. Open the files (ProPhoto16 & sRGB8 ) into Photoshop, if you own it. Depending on your colour settings, one may look odd. I would suggest switching your Photoshop Colour Settings to 'Preserve Embedded Profile' to minimize mismatching problems. This is marked in Blue (ignore the red section, this screenshot was originally for another forum)
9. If it still doesn't match, report back with your Photoshop colour settings. So far so good? 10. Now open your 2 files (ProPhoto16 & sRGB8 ) into Windows Picture Viewer or another non-colour-managed application (web browser etc). The ProPhoto16 one looks grotty, right? That's because it's not colour managed. The sRGB8 one is as close as you'll get to a match in a non colour managed program. If you're still having trouble after all this, next port of call is corrupted monitor profiles (LR uses the monitor profile differently to most other programs), or dodgy graphics card drivers. But one step at a time...... "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NightHawk Member 51 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Kunsan AB, ROK (S. Korea) More info | Sep 07, 2009 20:42 | #30 René Damkot wrote in post #8601804 Okay. Step by step. What other software doe you have? In non color managed software, a ProPhotoRGB image will look awfully desaturated. I don't think the first image is ProPhotoRGB. I'm sure it's not ProPhotoRGB / 16bpc as Victoria suggested, since it's a jpg ![]() Try steps 1 through 5 first. Then 7 and 8. You started off with step #10, and I don't think you did that step right either... Only Software that I have is Canon Utilities which is garbage compared to what I have done in LR2 and PS2. I also have PS2 and LR2 however both of them aren't working properly. - Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1051 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||