Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 21 May 2007 (Monday) 20:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Laptops Suck. Well, My Laptop Sucks...

 
*Mike*
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
May 21, 2007 20:03 |  #1

I just recently picked up a new laptop. I haven't had a chance to calibrate the monitor, but today I was stuck at the studio waiting for a delivery so I played a little. I used the "calibration image" from Millers to get a rough match, and then started going through Saturday's wedding images. I just saw the result on a calibrated monitor... It's ugly.

All the warm tones, reds, yellows, oranges, etc, are grossly oversaturated. Ewwwww. If you happened to see the image I posted in the wedding forum before pulling it down, you know just how bad it is. Almost everything that I did is unusable...

I don't know if I hate the laptop, Vista, or my own stupidity. I never used a laptop for editing before... so I was even careful and watched the RGB values on the neutral tones to keep out color casts. images still suck. Aaaargh.

Suggestions on working with a laptop? Frequent calibration the only option? How do you control viewing angle for consistency? Any suggested calibration kit - ideally that's not a fortune?


Belle's Photography (external link)* Belle's Blog (external link) * Belle's MySpace (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 21, 2007 20:04 |  #2

Hmm well using an uncalibrated monitor for editing is a bad idea...but you should already know that.

My Dell's screen sucks too, so I tend to not really use it. But it's usable in color managed programs like PS and LR...it just looks like crap outside of those. Wallpaper, Windows Image Viewer, etc.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
*Mike*
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
May 21, 2007 20:10 |  #3

Yeah, I'm retarded. I've been spoiled having a couple of monitors that I haven't really had to think about in a while. I started to take for granted that I could trust the computer in front of me. Doh.

Is it hard to keep a laptop screen accurate since ambient light is changing with every location, viewing angle isn't consistent, etc.?


Belle's Photography (external link)* Belle's Blog (external link) * Belle's MySpace (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mario.
Senior Member
Avatar
624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado
     
May 21, 2007 20:11 |  #4

I spent $70 on my Spyder2, and have had nothing but great results on both desktop and laptop monitors. :)


Mario M. | Black Macbook 2.4/ 4GB | 40D | 350D| 17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 580EX | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 21, 2007 20:25 |  #5

*Mike* wrote in post #3244153 (external link)
Yeah, I'm retarded. I've been spoiled having a couple of monitors that I haven't really had to think about in a while. I started to take for granted that I could trust the computer in front of me. Doh.

Understandable.

*Mike* wrote in post #3244153 (external link)
Is it hard to keep a laptop screen accurate since ambient light is changing with every location, viewing angle isn't consistent, etc.?

Yeah I tend to not use my laptop for processing, despite being much much faster than my desktop.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 22, 2007 02:53 |  #6

*Mike* wrote in post #3244114 (external link)
Suggestions on working with a laptop?

Don't do color critical work on them, or use a seperate monitor...
Calibration can only do so much, then again, it should get you 'within the ballpark'.

Changing brightness of the surrounding and variation in viewing angle are difficult to take into account. Also, most laptop screens are just not good.

I'm assuming your color mananegment is setup right? (link in my sig)

Calibration: I own an Optix XRPro. Very nice.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,015 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Laptops Suck. Well, My Laptop Sucks...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2898 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.