Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 22 May 2007 (Tuesday) 08:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question for the 400 f5.6 owners

 
fritz1
Senior Member
558 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 9
Joined May 2006
Location: Delaware Valley
     
May 22, 2007 08:11 |  #1

What do you consider a maximum distance to render best detail on particularly small, and then medium size birds with the 400 f5.6 L what is the ideal range? thanks


EOS 5D, EOS 5D MKIII, EOS 20D, EOS Elan, AE1Program, Tamrac Expedition 7 backpack Tamrac Expedition 5 backpack, Low Pro AW fanny
EF 17-40 f/4 L, EF 24-105 f/4 L IS, EF 70-200 f4 L,
EF 400 f5.6 L, Sigma 150-600DG HSM OS f5-6.3,
EF 28-105 USM,EF 100-300 USM,580EXII
B+W,POL+FD Lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luckyart60
Goldmember
Avatar
1,097 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2003
Location: DOHA QATAR
     
May 22, 2007 08:30 |  #2

I use mine always with my 1.4 extender fittted.
Depending on the size of the bird anything over 50/70 meters
(165/230 ft) is not ususally worth taking, unless just for bird sighting record purposes.
But I will be interested in others comments here


John A Thompson
http://www.pbase.com/l​uckyjon/birds_of_qatar (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
May 22, 2007 08:42 |  #3

I found that anything over 30 feet almost wasn't worth the effort for Robin sized birds or smaller. Eagles in flight are good out to about 100 yards. I never had any luck with the teleconverters. Even the 1.4x reduced image quality terribly and the 2x was worthless. Others get good results, but I found the canon brand a terrible waste of money. I got more actual use from a set of cheap Kenko tubes than ever the TC's. A set of tubes will magnify the image quite a bit and you keep auto focus, but they won't work at maximum focus distance but will lower the minimum to about 3.5 feet instead of 12. ;)

The trick is to use a hide, such as a hunting tent or your car and shoot out the window. The car window has been one of my most productive shooting positions to date.

If you can, set up your own yard with feeders and perching sticks to bring the local birds to you. Plan the angles of sunlight, shooting position from a window or buy a little tent hide for the purpose.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pttenn
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,671 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tennessee
     
May 22, 2007 09:12 |  #4

Agree about Mitch's appraisal of the tc's being worthless. Shots are blurry. Period.
With a tripod and good lighting, you can get fair detail out to 50'. And sometimes you get lucky and can get soaring hawks way higher than 50'. :)
Karen


Canon 50D, 40D, Tokina 12-24,Canon 18-55,Canon 28-135 IS, Canon 50 1.8,Canon 75-300 5.6,
Canon 200 2.8 L, Canon 400 f/5.6 L, Bogen monopod and Sunpak Tripod with manfrotto Pistol ball grip.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fritz1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
558 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 9
Joined May 2006
Location: Delaware Valley
     
May 22, 2007 09:19 |  #5

Thanks for confirming that everyone I just wanted to know the lens's capability and make sure it's not me or the lens/camera


EOS 5D, EOS 5D MKIII, EOS 20D, EOS Elan, AE1Program, Tamrac Expedition 7 backpack Tamrac Expedition 5 backpack, Low Pro AW fanny
EF 17-40 f/4 L, EF 24-105 f/4 L IS, EF 70-200 f4 L,
EF 400 f5.6 L, Sigma 150-600DG HSM OS f5-6.3,
EF 28-105 USM,EF 100-300 USM,580EXII
B+W,POL+FD Lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
May 22, 2007 09:25 |  #6

All lenses have a break off point. While you could shoot the moon with any of them, looking at the moon, it's bigger than a small bird at 30 or 40 feet. You can shoot small birds way out there, but you would have to crop the image so much to expand the bird that the quality would degrade to the point it makes no sense to do it. Get close, or entice the birds closer to you. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

714 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Question for the 400 f5.6 owners
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2726 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.