Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 May 2007 (Wednesday) 20:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post Processing for enlargements question

 
Reptile ­ Bob
Senior Member
Avatar
306 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
     
May 23, 2007 20:33 |  #1

Hello,

I'm getting some enlargements done of my macro work to sell. I'll be using Costco to get some large prints (up to 12 x 18 ) and posters (up to 20 x 30). The pictures were taken using a 5D so they have a fair amount of resolution. My question is, is it better to use Photoshop’s interpolerization algorithms to increase the resolution or to just send in the original.

I'm figuring if I do the enlargement myself, I can control the sharpness and control the aliasing, sharpness and halos. However I don't have any adaptive algorithm programs like Photozoom or Genuine Fractals, so I don't know if Costco could do a better job then me. Does anyone have any advice or recommendations?

Also, the minimum resolution requirements Costco gives are kind of low:
4x6 _______________690x460 pixels
5x7 _______________805x575 pixels
8x10 ______________1150x920 pixels
8x12 ______________1380x920 pixels
11x14 enlargements __1610x1265 pixels
12x18 enlargements __2070x1380 pixels
16x20 posters _______2300x1840 pixels
20x30 posters _______3450x2300 pixels

Would enlarging the photos that meet or exceed these requirements help the quality of the picture? (I know that enlarging doesn’t add information, but done well it can make the appearance of added information)

Any advice or recommendations would be welcomed.

Thanks,
Robert


All Canon: 350D / 5D / 50mm 1.8 / 10-22mm / 100mm 2.8 Macro / MP-E 65mm Macro /
24-105 4L IS / 70-200 2.8L IS / 2x T-con / 580 Ex Flash (2)
Other Stuff: Slingshot 300 / Stealth Reporter 650 / Extension tube set / a few sigmas :rolleyes:
http://community.websh​ots.com/user/wwwplants (external link)
http://s95.photobucket​.com …ptilebob/Macro/​?start=all (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodBarker
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Hervey Bay Australia
     
May 23, 2007 21:42 |  #2

I would do the resizing my self , I print my own but if I were to send them out I would still want full control of any PP ,,, Geniune Fractals is very good , but you can also get great results using PS , simple rule in PS when upsizing use Bicubic Smoother , when downsizing use Bicubic Sharper , and if you are going up more than 50% do it in a couple off steps , then do final Proof color and fine tune sharpness and its reay for print .

Rod




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reptile ­ Bob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
306 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
     
May 24, 2007 11:20 as a reply to  @ RodBarker's post |  #3

Thanks for the advice. For poster prints, what resolution should I be aiming for in the enlargement, or is it better to keep the pixels per inch constant for the enlargement?


All Canon: 350D / 5D / 50mm 1.8 / 10-22mm / 100mm 2.8 Macro / MP-E 65mm Macro /
24-105 4L IS / 70-200 2.8L IS / 2x T-con / 580 Ex Flash (2)
Other Stuff: Slingshot 300 / Stealth Reporter 650 / Extension tube set / a few sigmas :rolleyes:
http://community.websh​ots.com/user/wwwplants (external link)
http://s95.photobucket​.com …ptilebob/Macro/​?start=all (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodBarker
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Hervey Bay Australia
     
May 24, 2007 18:34 |  #4

Bob , I use 300 dpi up to 16x20 then I go 240 , for big 30x20 posters if its a good shot then 200dpi will be ok as you are standing further away from the big posters ,, its about workflow really and off course the more res the better but the the file gets huge so you balance how your set up can handle big files , Ive had some digital paintings for posters hit 800mg or more after some PP and many layers .

Rod




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 25, 2007 02:22 |  #5

I agree with Rod. If you have PSCS2 you can do excellent upsizes using this techique:
http://www.outbackphot​o.com/workflow/wf_60/e​ssay.html (external link)


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,381 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Post Processing for enlargements question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2597 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.