Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 May 2007 (Thursday) 04:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Filenames from two 20D bodies

 
chris ­ b
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Surrey, UK
     
May 24, 2007 04:59 |  #1

Hi all,

I'm going on safari next month and have bought a second-hand 20D body to use as a backup. I'm now thinking I'll leave a wide angle lens on the backup body and use my main 20D with my 100-400. I currently use Breeze Systems Downloader Pro to download files with the %T option in the filename to differentiate between files taken on the original 20D, my old 350D and Pro1. I've been searching through other posts and come across the advise to synchronize the clocks, but is there anything I can set on the cameras (other than the owner field) to automatically differentiate between files shot on the two bodies?

Many thanks!


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
::John::
Cream of the Crop
8,660 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 408
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
May 24, 2007 07:07 |  #2

The online help file for Downloader Pro states the following:

Suggestions for one photographer with more than one camera



A professional photographer may have several different cameras and use them to cover an event such as a wedding. When they download the images they want to be able to be able to identify which camera took which picture and also avoid duplicate filenames. There are a number of ways Downloader Pro can help:


1. Use the {T1} token to extract the camera model from the shooting data and use it to prefix the filename e.g. the cameras might be a Nikon D2X and a Nikon D200. The filename could be specified as "{T1}_{o}" ({T1} for the camera model and {o} for the original filename on the memory card) and this would give filenames like D2X_DSC_0001.JPG and D200_DSC_0001.JPG

2. Option 1 doesn't help if the cameras are the same model. If the cameras are Canon digital SLRs the camera serial number could be used instead. e.g. if the cameras are both Canon EOS 30D's the filename could be specified as "{c}_{o}" ({c} extracts the camera's serial number from the shooting data) and this would give filenames like 0130100302_IMG_0001.JP​G and 0230104671_IMG_0001.JP​G.

3. Option 2 is OK, but it does result in long filenames with aren't very meaningful. An alternative is to use the camera mapping setting in preferences to map the camera model name and serial number to something more meaningful e.g. map "Canon EOS 30D serial # 0130100302" to "30D1" and "Canon EOS 30D serial # 0230104671" to "30D2". Then use {T8} to include the mapped value in the filename e.g. "{T8}_{o}" which would give filenames like 30D1_IMG_0001.JPG and 30D2_IMG_0001.JPG.



This technique can also be used with other cameras provided they allow you to specify a user comment in the camera which is added to each image. For example the user comments for two Nikon D200 cameras could be set to "(c) John Smith, camera #1" and "(c) John Smith, camera #2" and provided the comments are not the same different mappings for {T8} can be setup for each camera.

Options 2 and 3 look like they could be the ones you want to look at.

This info was found here (external link)


I am the proud owner of the Peleng 8mm Fisheye lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 24, 2007 07:12 |  #3

Any particular reason you feel you need to tell them apart at a glance? If it's just to check things every so often (focus, etc) you can simply look in the EXIF for the body number. Or label your bodies 1 and 2 or something and just make a mental note of which had which lens attached and go by the focal length used (also in EXIF).


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ b
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Surrey, UK
     
May 24, 2007 08:18 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #4

Thanks ::John::, option 3 looks like the answer. :)

@cdifoto - as my 350D and 20D have both passed 9999 I rename the files as e.g. 20D_YYMMDD_xxxx (where xxxx is the original file number) to ensure filenames would be unique. This format also makes it easy to sort photos in order when using two bodies on the same day. I just wanted to be able separate my files out with the same convention even with two 20D bodies.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 24, 2007 08:22 |  #5

Ahh makes sense. I just name mine when I import as YYYY-MM-DD-[Sequence] into folders for that day/shoot, named for the first day in the same format of YYYY-MM-DD.

So, for example, today's images would go into a folder called 2007-05-24 and would be named 2007-05-24-001, 2007-05-24-002, 2007-05-24-003, etc. In Lightroom the camera used is displayed at a glance, but I have a 1D and 1D II, not two 1D IIs or some such. Thus it's obvious which is which.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
May 24, 2007 08:52 as a reply to  @ chris b's post |  #6

When I first went to multiple bodies I was intent on keeping them separate so that I knew what came from which body. Then I found it really didn't matter as I was never looking at it in that finite of detail.

I now shoot with 4 digital bodies and have developed my own little internal system that works quite well for me. I copy all of images from either my cards or my digital wallet onto my hard drive. I have a numbering system that is unique to each camera type. It looks something like:

nnnnn_event_ . The nnnnn is a sequential number that I keep track of the last used number so that I know where to start next. The event is just a short descriptive so that I know the jist of the subject matter.

I do my keywording and anything else that I need with respect to EXIF. I then copy the files to a 1TB drive that I have as well as one other external hard drive. I never copy anything until the file renaming has been completed and I also never start to process until this happens.

This may sound like alot but it really only takes a short while and it works great for me. If I need to know something about an image, like the specific body, I can always refer to the exif. I've reworked this system a few times to get it to the point where I am comfortable with it. I'm not saying that this is the end all be all but it works for me.

Don't get caught up in trying to capture all that information up front when you, in all likely hood, will very seldom need it and it is available to you in any event.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,311 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Filenames from two 20D bodies
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1303 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.