Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
Thread started 26 May 2007 (Saturday) 06:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SHOW US YOUR BEST PANNING SHOT

 
Racer997
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jun 07, 2010 22:44 |  #2686

Dean Rachwitz wrote in post #10318209 (external link)
I was there to ride, but tried for a few shots when it was really way too dark. Here's one that came out OK.

QUOTED IMAGE

As a fellow KTM (and Aprillia) rider, I like. :)

Flores wrote in post #10321112 (external link)
a couple I took a few months ago...
QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

Sure looks a little like Texas World Speedway?


I love Canon! :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmoore16
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Detroit Area
     
Jun 07, 2010 23:44 |  #2687

This is a question that I have always had...

Why is it that one spot on this car (The Jager decal) is crisp, and yet in front of and behind this spot, it is blurred. It isn't f stop. Could it be camera rotation about the Jager decal? I always wanted to know to control this effect to either eliminate it or use it creatively.

Thoughts?

marekp wrote in post #10293750 (external link)
I don' t know, if this one of the best, but one of the last one.

QUOTED IMAGE




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmoore16
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Detroit Area
     
Jun 08, 2010 00:48 as a reply to  @ jmoore16's post |  #2688

Here is my $0.02...

The Fox Body Mustang Drag Car was shot with a Canon 5D Mk II, 16-35 F2.8L set to 35mm, 1/8 sec at f/16 and ISO 100.

The orange Rehagen Mustang FR500S was shot with the same Canon 5D Mk II, 300 F2.8L IS with IS on 2, f/5.6 at 1/200 sec and ISO set at 50.

I could experiment with lower shutter speeds on the drag car because I could reshoot if I needed to. The race, on the other hand, would not be re-run if I requested (I don't know why not!!!) so I had to shoot kind of a fast shutter speed for panning. I usually shoot pans at 1/60 sec to get good blur in the wheels and then shoot a ton to get sharp vehicle bodies.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Racer997
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jun 08, 2010 06:41 |  #2689

jmoore16 wrote in post #10322055 (external link)
This is a question that I have always had...

Why is it that one spot on this car (The Jager decal) is crisp, and yet in front of and behind this spot, it is blurred. It isn't f stop. Could it be camera rotation about the Jager decal? I always wanted to know to control this effect to either eliminate it or use it creatively.

Thoughts?

As it was explained to me: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=858548


I love Canon! :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flores
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2010
Location: TEXAS
     
Jun 08, 2010 06:56 |  #2690

Racer997 wrote in post #10321782 (external link)
As a fellow KTM (and Aprillia) rider, I like. :)

Sure looks a little like Texas World Speedway?

It is, in fact Texas World Speedway! Good eye!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmoore16
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Detroit Area
     
Jun 08, 2010 09:44 |  #2691


Viewing the motorcycle example panning shot that you talked about in the link, I don't know if I buy it. The motorcycle is moving straight away from you. It isn't turning. The distance from the lens to the rear and front of the motorcycle stays the same as you pan.

Now with that said, if the car above is turning, then the rear of the car will change distance from camera to car at a different rate than the front of the car. That would explain why one end of the car would be "soft".

I think the specific photo in this thread of the Orange 240 drift car is blurred due to rotation. Not necessarily rotating the camera but the car rotating relative to the camera.

I just don't understand why the entire Jager decal and fender is in focus. Almost a region. I have more extreme examples.

Thoughts?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Racer997
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jun 08, 2010 10:10 |  #2692

Flores wrote in post #10323280 (external link)
It is, in fact Texas World Speedway! Good eye!

I still race there and have many, many laps there going back to 1987. That turn is T9 (aka: the horseshoe or carousal), and you probably shot those from over the fence and Armco with at least a 300mm lens.


I love Canon! :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flores
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2010
Location: TEXAS
     
Jun 08, 2010 10:37 |  #2693

Racer997 wrote in post #10324301 (external link)
I still race there and have many, many laps there going back to 1987. That turn is T9 (aka: the horseshoe or carousal), and you probably shot those from over the fence and Armco with at least a 300mm lens.

very good! I was jostling elbows with the cafe photo guy. :) I'm over in sugar land, so motoring up there for a day of shooting was pretty easy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
izthistaken
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,857 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Warren, MI
     
Jun 08, 2010 12:33 |  #2694

jmoore16 wrote in post #10322314 (external link)
Here is my $0.02...

The Fox Body Mustang Drag Car was shot with a Canon 5D Mk II, 16-35 F2.8L set to 35mm, 1/8 sec at f/16 and ISO 100.

Hey,I know that guy. Where's his white hair at? :)


Matt
flickr  (external link)
5DMKII | 16-35L |24-70L| 70-200L 2.8 II | Canon 50mm 1.8|35mm F2|580ex x2|Lumopro LP160|Nikon SB24|Cybersyncs x3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ICURWLDTHRUWMYLENS
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jun 08, 2010 17:34 |  #2695

Here ya go........
450D 1/100 f/14 85mm iso 200 lens 17-85mm USM IS f/4-5.6


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EDG*salv
Member
Avatar
61 posts
Joined May 2009
     
Jun 09, 2010 00:08 as a reply to  @ post 10308341 |  #2696

My favorite

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4034/4516467024_13f16ff841_b.jpg
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4034/4656868237_94ab1d2d93_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tinners
Member
182 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
     
Jun 09, 2010 09:33 |  #2697

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/4684774347_e98655ceb5_b.jpg

Canon 1DmkII |Canon 7D|Canon 400D|And a whole bunch of average lenses.|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeherPhoto
Goldmember
1,055 posts
Gallery: 129 photos
Likes: 177
Joined Feb 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 09, 2010 20:29 |  #2698

thats pretty good ^


Neherphoto.com
2 Canon 7D, 100-400 USM IS L, 28-135 USM IS, Nifty Fifty, Kit 18-55, and a little luck! :lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
300Daz
Senior Member
Avatar
353 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 10, 2010 06:41 |  #2699

jmoore16 wrote in post #10322055 (external link)
This is a question that I have always had...

Why is it that one spot on this car (The Jager decal) is crisp, and yet in front of and behind this spot, it is blurred. It isn't f stop. Could it be camera rotation about the Jager decal? I always wanted to know to control this effect to either eliminate it or use it creatively.

Thoughts?

This link explains the effect you are talking about:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=487139

Daz


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/d_kent/external link
All Ansel Adams quotes are currently in use. Please try again later.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gusarb
Senior Member
299 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.
     
Jun 10, 2010 14:52 |  #2700

IMAGE: http://www.boostiao.com/portal/wp-content/gallery/2010/2da_motovelocidad/IMG_1601.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.boostiao.com/portal/wp-content/gallery/2010/2da_motovelocidad/IMG_1648.jpg

www.gusarbphoto.com (external link)
60D + 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS + 55-250 f4-5.6 IS + 50mm f1.8 mkII + 85mm f1.8 + Sigma 30nn f1.4 + tokina 11-16 f2.8 + 2 580EX II + 430EX II + Yongnuo 560II + YN-603 triggers + FlipSide 200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,260,792 views & 10,754 likes for this thread, 2261 members have posted to it and it is followed by 271 members.
SHOW US YOUR BEST PANNING SHOT
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1040 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.