Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 29 May 2007 (Tuesday) 01:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

so what do you guys think of the new S560?

 
411odysseys
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined May 2007
     
May 29, 2007 01:16 |  #1

just picked one up. had to replace the OLD sony cyber shot 3.3MG

big difference.

but is it me or does this camera take CLEAR SOFT pictures. not really SHARP pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 29, 2007 11:38 |  #2

Be careful to distinguish focus from sharpness.

At macro distances, the depth of field is typically rather small - which means only part of the image is in focus. You have to be very careful where to place that point of sharpest focus.

Sharpness is actually about accutance rather than focus - and is done by a sharpening algorithm after the picture is taken, such as Unsharp Mask. Digital camera pictures tend to start out rather on the soft side - but many compacts tend to sharpen very aggressively and the files you finish up with on your memory card can be oversharpened. As I shoot RAW with my digital SLR, I can sharpen my images to taste - and whilst it is a matter of taste, I often don't sharpen as much as many compacts would.


Unfortunately many compacts are designed around the "heavy noise reduction, very saturated colours, heavy sharpening" philosophy, as that's what many consumers supposedly look for - but this can produce unnatural photos where fine detail is lost. The trend to market cameras based on how many megapixels doesn't help - you're often better off with fewer megapixels to have less noise in the image when you start out. Producing a 6x4 print really doesn't need 10 megapixels!

Canon compacts are pretty good at not going overboard on noise reduction, sharpening and colour saturation - but this means the 'look' of your images may well be different to your previous camera. If you can tune the amount of sharpening, saturation and so on, it may be worth experimenting with the options.


Meanwhile, if you're not happy with the results, or simply want some comments, there's nothing better than providing a picture! A crop from a full sized image may be the most use here. If you want to provide a full size image, post a link rather than embedding it into your post.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
411odysseys
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined May 2007
     
May 29, 2007 19:43 as a reply to  @ DavidW's post |  #3

thanks for the reply i am starting to see what you mean, and understand it now.

say is there any good sites to read on what is what and how it should be used?

ISO,white levels, etc, etc.

like how to take better pictures and how to use the fuctions PROPERLY?

here is a couple pictures i did recently that i think look good.
youll see as they go on they get better, i have had the camera for 1 day now and have been playing with it alot.

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]



IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
so what do you guys think of the new S560?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1718 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.