Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 May 2007 (Tuesday) 09:53
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "What screen resolution do you use?"
less than 800 x 600
1
0.5%
800 x 600
4
2.1%
1024 x 768
27
14.4%
1280 x 1024
53
28.2%
greater than 1280 x 1024
84
44.7%
other
19
10.1%

184 voters, 188 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What screen resolution do you use?

 
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
May 29, 2007 13:04 |  #16

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #3285918 (external link)
er,. those are all pretty weeny resolutions there.. :lol:

I'm running 3,520 X 1200 :)

What monitor do you have?


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
May 29, 2007 13:08 |  #17

hortonsl62 wrote in post #3286454 (external link)
What monitor do you have?

By the sound of that res he's got a dual setup, am I right?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 29, 2007 13:30 |  #18

1600x1200 on my primary, 1024x768 on the second monitor.
I scale down to 800x533px for web.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 29, 2007 14:01 |  #19

hortonsl62 wrote in post #3286454 (external link)
What monitor do you have?

Anke wrote in post #3286473 (external link)
By the sound of that res he's got a dual setup, am I right?

Yup, he runs dual CRTs.

I voted 1280 x 1024 as that is what I currently have (also have a laptop at 1280 x 768 as someone mentioned earlier). I can't wait to get a bigger screen though, at least 20" wide, but hopefully 24" when they come down some more.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,928 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 29, 2007 14:22 |  #20

hortonsl62 wrote in post #3286454 (external link)
What monitor do you have?

Yes, it's a Sony FW900 24" wide screen @ 1920 x 1200 next to a SONY 21" G500 @ 1600 x 1200
Same physical height and resolution on the vertical so they match up nicely despite differing widths.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
curiousgeorge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,920 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London
     
May 29, 2007 14:29 |  #21

What's the appeal of a widescreen then?

A 1650 x 1050, which seems to be quite popular, is of a similar height to a 1280 x 1024, so it won't be much use for standard 1.5 ratio images. And many of the panoramic images I've seen have a far higher aspect ratio than that of the widesreens.


Photos from my travels (external link)
Canon EOS R6 MkII | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L | Samyang 14mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
May 29, 2007 14:31 |  #22

curiousgeorge wrote in post #3286941 (external link)
What's the appeal of a widescreen then?

A 1650 x 1050, which seems to be quite popular, is of a similar height to a 1280 x 1024, so it won't be much use for standard 1.5 ratio images. And many of the panoramic images I've seen have a far higher aspect ratio than that of the widesreens.

Viewing two apps side by side for one. In PS you can move the tool palletes out of the workspace so more real estate the better. Movies.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
curiousgeorge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,920 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London
     
May 29, 2007 14:32 |  #23

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #3286889 (external link)
Yes, it's a Sony FW900 24" wide screen @ 1920 x 1200 next to a SONY 21" G500 @ 1600 x 1200
Same physical height and resolution on the vertical so they match up nicely despite differing widths.

Interesting. Do you have images spanning across both screens? If so, then don't the frames of the monitors disrupt the images?


Photos from my travels (external link)
Canon EOS R6 MkII | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L | Samyang 14mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,928 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 29, 2007 14:45 |  #24

No, the 24" is plenty large for the images,, the 2nd screen is used fro tool bars or other open apps.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
May 29, 2007 15:09 |  #25

If the results are to have much meaning I think we need a poll with options that actually reflect modern resolutions.

My 17" widescreen laptop is 1920*1200 (used for editing my photos, daily surfing, email, spreadsheets etc.)

My 40" LCD TV is 1920*1080 (used for viewing/displaying my photos from my media centre PC)

Even my 6 year old 4:3 laptop is 1600*1200 (retired to the bedroom for casual surfing in bed when I'm having a lazy morning)

My 9 year old laptop is 1024*768. I don't use that at all.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jnev
Senior Member
258 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: san diego, ca
     
May 29, 2007 17:16 |  #26

My laptop is running 1440x900, and my 20" monitor (which I do all photo work on) is 1680x1050.


Camera: Rebel XT with BG-E3| 17-55 F/2.8 IS | 70-200 F/4.0L | Planning on others... :D
Computer: MacBook Pro | 2.2GHz | 4GB RAM | 120GB HDD | Snow Leopard 10.6.2 | Dell 2005FPW
Software: Lightroom 2.6 | Photoshop CS4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zepher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,626 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk,VA
     
May 29, 2007 18:29 |  #27

I use 1440x900 since that is the native res of my LCD's. I was running 1600x1200 when I had my CRT's.


Manny Desantos
Intel C2Q Q6600 3.06Ghz, 8GB Ram, 8.1TB, XFX HD5850, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, PS CS4 EXT (external link)

Canon 40D, EF 28-70L, 2x Canon XH-A1 HDV, Canon HV30 HDV
❶_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
May 29, 2007 18:31 |  #28

1920x1200 here.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gujustud
Senior Member
Avatar
636 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Richmond, BC, CAN
     
May 29, 2007 21:41 |  #29

1920x1200 on a 24". And I'll never go smaller again.


Visual Artist + World Nomad
AmishSolanki.com (external link) | ASphoto.ca (external link) | Blog (external link) | Travelblog (external link) | Google+ (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
May 29, 2007 22:52 |  #30

it's important to know what resolution is the most popular so you can resize it to the maximum size possible.

Why worry? For this forum, the maximum size possible is 800px X 800px?

IMAGE POSTING RULES ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,896 views & 0 likes for this thread, 43 members have posted to it.
What screen resolution do you use?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2875 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.