same here, but as has been mentioned, we're not really representative of 'internet-users'.
| POLL: "What screen resolution do you use?" |
 less than 800 x 600 | 1 0.5% |
| 800 x 600 | 4 2.1% |
| 1024 x 768 | 27 14.4% |
| 1280 x 1024 | 53 28.2% |
| greater than 1280 x 1024 | 84 44.7% |
| other | 19 10.1% |
PhilV Goldmember 1,977 posts Likes: 75 Joined Jan 2005 Location: S Yorks UK More info | Jun 09, 2007 15:22 | #46 same here, but as has been mentioned, we're not really representative of 'internet-users'. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mfreddo Member  98 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Jun 10, 2007 16:47 | #47 I am at 1680 x 1050 My Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Citizensmith Cream of the Crop  More info | Jul 20, 2007 06:48 | #48 I've visited PotN from my PDA before so I'll go for 320x240. My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lowcrust Senior Member  948 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Scandinavia More info | Jul 20, 2007 22:51 | #49 1680*1050 ~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied  12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Jul 20, 2007 23:00 | #50 1280x1024... one day later this year I might end up getting a bigger monitor... camera gear purchases keep getting in the way Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
B3SEO Senior Member  783 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Washington State More info | Jul 20, 2007 23:31 | #51 I have two 1600x1200 monitors running on Windows XP. Step back please... I'm armed with a camera...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Citizensmith Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 20, 2007 23:32 | #52 lowcrust wrote in post #3584052  1680*1050 Surprised to find that being the most widely (no pun intended!) used resolution here. Not long ago people considered it an odd size. Screen manufacturers are pushing wide screens so its rapidly become popular. The shape of a widescreen allows more to be cut from a single platter so its cheaper to make a 17" wide screen than a 17" normal screen. My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Brightside Senior Member  321 posts Likes: 758 Joined May 2007 Location: Tier3 UK Lockdown More info | Jul 21, 2007 00:15 | #53 EOS_JD wrote in post #3285883 my monitor too is 1680x1050 and I usually post at 800 pixels on the longest edge. Ditto above, 800 wherever I post.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
miglo Member  47 posts Joined May 2007 Location: I hate MI More info | Jul 21, 2007 00:47 | #54 2560x1600. I don't think I can *ever* go back to anything lower Canon 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Damo77 Goldmember  4,700 posts Likes: 115 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | Jul 21, 2007 04:54 | #55 Radtech1 wrote in post #3286018 Assuming an LCD monitor, the best resolution to use is it's native resoultion. Good call, Rad! I wondered when somebody would point that out. Anybody who is not using their LCD at native resolution must be wondering why their images are fuzzy!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2007 10:57 | #56 Has anyone said they don't use the native resolution? Photos from my travels
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2839 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
