Wow! You would only need 1 card!
http://asia.cnet.com …,39051887,61953561,00.htm
richardho11 Senior Member 850 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | May 29, 2007 14:48 | #1 ![]() Wow! You would only need 1 card! https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2962090&postcount=534
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gryphonslair99 Senior Member ![]() 491 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Wichita, Kansas More info | May 29, 2007 14:57 | #2 Even more photos to loose if the card goes bad. Not an advantage from my way of thinking. You don't take a photograph. You ask, quietly, to borrow it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zepher Goldmember ![]() 1,626 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Norfolk,VA More info | May 29, 2007 18:51 | #3 Good for HD video, not good for current DSLR's. Maybe when we get to 50+MP sensors. Manny Desantos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_aravena isn't this answer a stickie yet? ![]() 12,458 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Back in the 757 More info | May 29, 2007 22:44 | #4 Yeah, 4GB is big enough for me and a total of 12GB is definitely enough. Last Shot Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ephemeral Senior Member ![]() 896 posts Joined May 2006 Location: UK (London) More info | Look on the brighter side...it means that 2gb cards will get even cheaper. Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cant wait until they start using those in mp3 players! ekin photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember ![]() 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | May 30, 2007 10:58 | #7 I would still need two cards. I gotta have a spare, just in case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jaime Goldmember ![]() 2,464 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 More info | May 30, 2007 11:07 | #8 I agree that is an accident waiting to happen. And it will be an expensive one as well. I use 4GB. I have two of them (one as a spare), and as it is I worry about then because I shoot in RAW and they fill up quite fast, and if I loose it, or have it go bad while it is full on the way home I would really go berserk. I already had a 2GB go bad on me after shooting all afternoon at a Cherry Blossom festival in Newark, NJ where they had Japanese performers put on a tremendous show. "My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember ![]() 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | May 30, 2007 22:00 | #9 Ephemeral wrote in post #3290714 ![]() Look on the brighter side...it means that 2gb cards will get even cheaper. ![]() haha...one can only hope! Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jklewer Goldmember ![]() 1,292 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: 34N 118W More info | May 31, 2007 10:36 | #10 I want a slot on my car near the stereo where I can plug in CF cards full o' mp3's and jam all day long!! That's what a 32GB CF would be sweet for!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | May 31, 2007 11:57 | #11 gryphonslair99 wrote in post #3287108 ![]() Even more photos to loose if the card goes bad. Not an advantage from my way of thinking. People used to say that a few years ago about 1 gig cards - better to get two 512Meg ones, dont want to loose all those images -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ipood Senior Member 306 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Washington More info | May 31, 2007 12:00 | #12 i can back up my hard drive on this foto.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
flipteg Member 176 posts Joined May 2007 More info | May 31, 2007 13:24 | #13 kevin_c wrote in post #3297514 ![]() People used to say that a few years ago about 1 gig cards - better to get two 512Meg ones, dont want to loose all those images ![]() By having two cards you could be doubling your risk of one failing... ? ![]() Don't know how many DSLR's can handle that size card at the moment. yes, but back then a 1gb holds more photos than it does now since files were smaller then... i think the real question should be how many pictures would someone be willing to risk of losing if a card goes bad... the number of pictures that a card can hold is far more important than how many bytes it has...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jklewer Goldmember ![]() 1,292 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: 34N 118W More info | May 31, 2007 13:27 | #14 flipteg wrote in post #3297943 ![]() yes, but back then a 1gb holds more photos than it does now since files were smaller then... i think the real question should be how many pictures would someone be willing to risk of losing if a card goes bad... the number of pictures that a card can hold is far more important than how many bytes it has... Agreed, so if I enter the habit of shooting small jpeg, than my 2GB card is WAY too big. That means I would lose 1500 pictures or more if that card corrupted. Hmm... better get out all those 16mb cards that came with the cameras...!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zepher Goldmember ![]() 1,626 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Norfolk,VA More info | May 31, 2007 17:24 | #15 jklewer wrote in post #3297109 ![]() I want a slot on my car near the stereo where I can plug in CF cards full o' mp3's and jam all day long!! That's what a 32GB CF would be sweet for!! that is what I am waiting for. Manny Desantos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Dannal01 948 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |