Title says it all. I shoot only children and maternity. I LOVE my 85 1.2L, but I sometimes(well, alot of times) would like more reach. Is the zoom something I would do better with in my field, or should I just stick with my primes?
TIA!
**luvmygirlz** Member 75 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Baltimore, Md More info | May 31, 2007 17:10 | #1 Title says it all. I shoot only children and maternity. I LOVE my 85 1.2L, but I sometimes(well, alot of times) would like more reach. Is the zoom something I would do better with in my field, or should I just stick with my primes? Kim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity  10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | May 31, 2007 17:12 | #2 Both! I use my 70-200 a lot for portraits. I use my 85 as well. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canned_heat Mostly Lurking  16 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: UK More info | May 31, 2007 17:17 | #3 135L with or without t/c ?? Canon 350d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stan43 Goldmember  1,206 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Louisville KY More info | May 31, 2007 17:20 | #4 It's a matter of preference. I wouyld not sell the 85 1.2L if that's what you mean. If you want to add the 70-200 2.8 that's fine but I would also consider the 135L and 200L for about the same price. Depends on whether your a zoom guy or a prime guy. Both will work. Canon: 5DSr,5Dmk3,1DXmk2 5d MK4,11-24L,35L,70-200 2.8L2,24-105L,24-70L,Sigma 24-105 Art,50 1.4 Art,Tamron SP85 1.8,Tamron SP90 Macro. Zeiss 135 F2 Milvus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 31, 2007 19:01 | #5 Stan43 wrote in post #3298909  It's a matter of preference. I wouyld not sell the 85 1.2L if that's what you mean. If you want to add the 70-200 2.8 that's fine but I would also consider the 135L and 200L for about the same price. Depends on whether your a zoom guy or a prime guy. Both will work. Thanks for the opinions...I would love to hear more. And yes, I guess that's what I was considering, selling the 85 1.2 for the zoom. I'm not really a zoom gal, as I never feel they are as sharp, but I am hearing wonderful things about this zoom Kim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1747 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
I can't even rent it, as it's never in stock!