Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 20 May 2004 (Thursday) 05:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

-=HOW TO=- Test if your 10D is back focussing.

 
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
May 20, 2004 05:52 |  #1

I noticed my 10D has a very slight back focus, so I did The Ruler Test. I made one shot with auto-focus, using the center focus point, and one with manual focus. For both shots I focused on the "20" on the ruler (the number was exactly in the center AF square). This is what I got:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Clearly, with AF, the "19" is more in focus than the "20", while with manual focus, I was able to get the focus exactly on the "20". :(

What can I do about this? Can Canon re-calibrate the focus to make it exactly accurate? Did you have this problem and did you bring it to Canon, and did they repair it well?

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msvadi
Goldmember
1,974 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
May 20, 2004 07:08 |  #2

what lens did you use? what was the distance to the target? was the lighting okay? I was getting frontfocusing with my DRebel but it was more due to the bad light and target. Remember that AF sensor area is biger than AF points you see in the frame, so with the target like yours AF can easily choose not what you want.

Try to paint 20 line in red, make sure you have enough light and that you are not too far from the target and repeat the test.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
May 20, 2004 07:30 |  #3

You're actually better off by putting a flat black piece of cardboard or something parallel to the sensor plane and focusing on that. Put the ruler next to that cardboard at a 45-degree angle to the sensor plane, and line the "20" up to the edge of the cardboard.

Now you'll get true focus on the cardboard, and then use the ruler to check focus.

Trying to focus on a line on the ruler is not very accurate.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
May 20, 2004 07:45 |  #4

msvadi, I used my 17-40L at f/4, 40mm. The light was good, sunlight, with a shutter speed of 1/500 second. So bad light is not the cause of the problem. The target was quite close, maybe 1.5 feet, the camera was on a tripod and I used mirror lock-up and the self-timer.

Scottes, thanks, I'll try that...


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msvadi
Goldmember
1,974 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
May 20, 2004 07:49 |  #5

I still think that there are too many lines too close to each other. This may confuse the AF. Check this https://photography-on-the.net …&highlight=fron​t+focusing I think that Tom W setup is worth trying.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 20, 2004 07:56 |  #6

Scottes wrote:
You're actually better off by putting a flat black piece of cardboard or something parallel to the sensor plane and focusing on that. Put the ruler next to that cardboard at a 45-degree angle to the sensor plane, and line the "20" up to the edge of the cardboard.

Now you'll get true focus on the cardboard, and then use the ruler to check focus.

Trying to focus on a line on the ruler is not very accurate.

Very, very true!! This type of ruler test is highly inaccurate.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
May 20, 2004 08:40 |  #7

OK..... I tried Bob Atkins' focus test (external link).

With this test, the focus is exactly spot-on with my 17-40L at f/4! :)
No need to have my 10D checked by Canon.

Thanks for the info....


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
May 20, 2004 10:21 |  #8

Here's the setup I used to provide myself with the peace of mind necessary to keep shooting and stop worrying:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


Its kind of a combination of Bob Atkins' chart and Pekka's methodology. Using a separate object for focus keeps your focus sensors from locking on something other than what you're shooting.

Here's a retouched copy of the focus sensor size/shape compared to the squares in the viewfinder. Note that the actual sensor size is in red (this is from either Chuck Westfall of Canon or Bob Atkins' web site, I don't remember):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


As you can see, the sensors are far bigger than the indicator squares (this is common BTW). If any part of an active sensor catches a high-contrast object, it will grab focus. That is why I used a separate object, since the camera could conceivably grab focus on any mark on a ruler.

Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msvadi
Goldmember
1,974 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
May 20, 2004 10:27 |  #9

Jesper wrote:
OK..... I tried Bob Atkins' focus test (external link).

With this test, the focus is exactly spot-on with my 17-40L at f/4! :)
No need to have my 10D checked by Canon.

Thanks for the info....

Excellent!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JZaun
Goldmember
2,488 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
May 20, 2004 11:39 |  #10

Thanks to all of you for the replies on this thread. With all the discussion on 10D focus issues, I was wondering if I had a problem ?! Just wondering. This thread led me to the Adkins test. I set it up and Like Jasper, my 10D is fine. Not only that I tested all me lens. 100-400, ( at different lengths) 100mm macro and 24-85. None were more than 1-2 division off center!!! Now I have a easy test in case I get paranoid again :D :D :D :D :D

JZ




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 20, 2004 12:12 |  #11

We have a number of threads on this.. but this thread in particular looks to be a great place to start a Sticky..

Jesper.. would you mind if I edit the title... slightly to a how to sort of title?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
May 20, 2004 13:54 |  #12

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
We have a number of threads on this.. but this thread in particular looks to be a great place to start a Sticky..

Jesper.. would you mind if I edit the title... slightly to a how to sort of title?

No, that's OK with me ofcourse. Good to have a sticky topic about this. Probably all the talk about focus problems with the 10D is because too many people like me are doing a "ruler test", without understanding that it's not an accurate way to test the AF.


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,404 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
-=HOW TO=- Test if your 10D is back focussing.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2162 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.