I took this image this morning at Sprague Lake, Rocky Mountain National Park. Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated!
Malok
![]() | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script |
Malok Member 239 posts Joined Sep 2003 More info | May 20, 2004 20:48 | #1 I took this image this morning at Sprague Lake, Rocky Mountain National Park. Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HKMonkey Member 112 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Hong Kong, China More info | May 20, 2004 21:00 | #2 I like it. I think one thing that makes it better for me is the inclusion of the rocks in the water. Some may think it's distracting from the mirror effect, but I think something small like that can add a lot. My only wish for it to be better is a little more detail in the trees on the right. I would like to see more individual trees rather than a mass of green. Does that make sense anywhere else other than in my head? Aaron Presley
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Penguin_101_1 Goldmember 1,259 posts Joined Feb 2004 More info | May 20, 2004 21:13 | #3 Permanent banI like it!! Rocky Mountain Natonal Park is beautaful! I am going back for the 12th time this summer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 20, 2004 21:34 | #4 beautiful! The only thing that bugs me a bit is that all the elements seem to draw my eyes immediately to dead center which is the least interesting part of the photo (the tree line). Perhaps if it was cropped differently or shifted one way or another so as not to draw the eye away from the water and peaks. Chuck
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shniks Goldmember 1,041 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | May 20, 2004 21:37 | #5 Gorgeous photo, I really like the rocks in the foreground too, and the mountain in the background is amazing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
G3 Senior Member 593 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2004 More info | May 20, 2004 21:49 | #6 An absolutely gorgeous shot. About 10 seconds worth of levels work will bring out the detail in the trees. Bring up levels and move the right hand slider to the left just until it touches the right end of the histogram data, then move the left hand slider to the right just until it touches the the left hand side of the histogram data, then move the middle slider to the left just until it brings out the detail you want in the trees.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 21, 2004 04:32 | #7 Thanks for all your comments! I am going to try again this morning and see if I can't get better light on the subject. If I improve it, I'll post a copy here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Penguin_101_1 Goldmember 1,259 posts Joined Feb 2004 More info | May 21, 2004 06:03 | #8 Permanent banI would say keep the rocks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1293 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||