Calibrated my monitor this weekend, and it didnt change a single bit. I'd previously done it by eye and it made a difference. Now I calibrated it with Spyder Pro and it hasnt changed. How good are my eye's?? 
sando Goldmember 2,868 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Jun 04, 2007 08:12 | #1 Calibrated my monitor this weekend, and it didnt change a single bit. I'd previously done it by eye and it made a difference. Now I calibrated it with Spyder Pro and it hasnt changed. How good are my eye's?? - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Jun 04, 2007 09:13 | #2 They certainly must be better than mine cause the Huey made a good bit of difference making what I see right.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Jun 04, 2007 09:36 | #3 When I calibrated my monitor (previously used Adobe Gamma, by eye), it warmed the temperature a little, but otherwise black and white points seemed pretty much spot on. D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jun 04, 2007 11:44 | #4 Permanent banBut did you print to see if it changed your prints any? 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidW Goldmember 3,165 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Bedfordshire, UK More info | Jun 04, 2007 12:59 | #5 If your black point, white point, and colour temperature (white balance as digital photographers might think of it) weren't changed by the calibration, you may not notice much. However, one would hope that decent hardware calibration would improve the smoothness and accuracy of gradients, the neutrality of neutral tones throughout the range, and accuracy of displayed colour.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CubixRube Senior Member 548 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Livermore, Ca. More info | Jun 04, 2007 15:09 | #6 Mine all changed a TON when I calibrated them for the first time with my Spyder. I hadn't done any other "visual" calibrating prior to that, so that may be why. Upside the head...A place where nothing good ever happens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Jun 04, 2007 17:16 | #7 Hellashot wrote in post #3318468 But did you print to see if it changed your prints any? Well, I only calibrated my monitor, but as the main change was the colour temperature, prints won't change much (I didn't get a printer profiler, as I don't have a printer!) D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2007 02:54 | #8 Hellashot wrote in post #3318468 But did you print to see if it changed your prints any? I dont have a printer at home, so Im unable to. But I was happy with my prints before, so I cant imagine they'd change much at all. - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Jun 05, 2007 07:20 | #9 Hellashot wrote in post #3318468 But did you print to see if it changed your prints any? I am sure you know this, but calibrating your monitor won't change your prints directly. It will affect the way you change your photos which in turn may affect the prints. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2789 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||