Hi all,
Would like to ask about 5D performance in low light. Heard some not-so-good comments about it and would like to clarify before i purchase my 5D.
And for 5D, can i use my 580EX AF without firing the flash?
Thanks!
http81 Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Jun 06, 2007 05:16 | #1 Hi all,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2007 05:35 | #2 http81, Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HoofHearted Member 113 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Chorley, UK More info | Jun 06, 2007 05:35 | #3 With my 5D I've taken shots in dark churches which have been quite amazing. The 1600 ISO is superb. I've also got IS lenses though. This allows slower shutter speeds. The combination of the two factors makes for great pictures. I don't notice the noise at all hardly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2007 05:42 | #4 Hi, i am refering to the AF speed. John_B wrote in post #3329439 http81, Welcome to the forum ![]() In performance do you mean AF? or exposure? Yes you can use your 580ex AF assist beam without firing the flash, its done by selecting C.fn-07 in the camera menu custom functions.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2007 05:50 | #5 http81, Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2007 05:54 | #6 eh, i am not too sure of how good the AF in 10D is, but i will assume its good. John_B wrote in post #3329460 http81, Go for it, its a great camera ![]() For AF, well its superior to my 10D if that helps. Having a faster (larger aperture lens) will also have some influence.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 06, 2007 06:20 | #7 I will make this statement from experience. I have the 10D, 20D, 5D. The 20D is a remarkable improvement for IQ and quick AF than my 10D. The AF in dim light was so much better, I stopped using my 10D all together. Then the 5D came out and I wanted to try it in low light because I shoot concerts. I was amazed again how wonderful the improvement was. Very little noise with 1600 ISO. I also have to add that the lens does matter. If you have anything smaller than f2.8, the camera isn't going to like it much. The lens does matter no matter which camera you use. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drogos Goldmember 1,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: CHICAGO More info | Jun 06, 2007 08:51 | #8 5D will hunt in low light, forget about using non-center focusing spot ...using automatic (closest subject ) helps a bit ...very low light on my 24-70 works so so ...AF wise ...but the whole rest is stellar Lukasz Drogowski
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jun 06, 2007 09:26 | #9 SuzyView wrote in post #3329517 I will make this statement from experience. I have the 10D, 20D, 5D. The 20D is a remarkable improvement for IQ and quick AF than my 10D. The AF in dim light was so much better, I stopped using my 10D all together. Then the 5D came out and I wanted to try it in low light because I shoot concerts. I was amazed again how wonderful the improvement was. Very little noise with 1600 ISO. I also have to add that the lens does matter. If you have anything smaller than f2.8, the camera isn't going to like it much. The lens does matter no matter which camera you use. You mean like my EF 24-105L and 100-400L?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 06, 2007 09:58 | #10 Low light autofocus is problematic in all cameras. The 5D is no worse than and any other consumer camera, and is slightly better than the 20D/30D. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2007 22:47 | #11 if i want for normal print, and in low light, does the picture quality from 5D comes out to be better than 30D and 400D?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davesrose Title Fairy still hasn't visited me! 4,568 posts Likes: 879 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Jun 06, 2007 22:51 | #12 http81 wrote in post #3334140 if i want for normal print, and in low light, does the picture quality from 5D comes out to be better than 30D and 400D? Larger sensor with more MPs and better ISO performance.....what do you think? Sometimes Measurebating does work Canon 5D mk IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jun 06, 2007 23:27 | #13 davesrose wrote in post #3334156 Larger sensor with more MPs and better ISO performance.....what do you think? Sometimes Measurebating does work ![]() I agree.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roman_t Cream of the Crop 5,271 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Astana, Kazakhstan More info | Jun 06, 2007 23:43 | #14 lately i had shooting at ceremony in church. i took flash along but after couple shots with it i put it back to sack. at iso1600 and f4,5 images came out fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGreatDivorce Senior Member 811 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Jun 06, 2007 23:48 | #15 In single-shot AF with the center point, it's as good as (if not slightly better) than the 1D II bodies. The 5D's AF has a working EV range that extends to -1 EV, whereas the 1DII's stop at 0 EV.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1395 guests, 143 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||