I just got my toe caps today..Now I know why they charge me $6.50 for shipping..Look at this hugh box and look at how small the item are..What a waste of money to ship something so small in a large box..
I just got my toe caps today..Now I know why they charge me $6.50 for shipping..Look at this hugh box and look at how small the item are..What a waste of money to ship something so small in a large box.. Nikon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 14, 2007 18:12 | #92 joegolf68 wrote in post #3377684 He might have thought the thin air there in Denver got ya. ![]() Oops, double checked, you are both from the mile high area. Hey I use duct tape for everything, not out of the question. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 14, 2007 18:13 | #93 kobe629 wrote in post #3378434 I just got my toe caps today..Now I know why they charge me $6.50 for shipping..Look at this hugh box and look at how small the item are..What a waste of money to ship something so small in a large box.. ![]() ![]() That bookshelf looks about like mine. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gooble Goldmember 3,149 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Mesa,AZ More info | Jun 14, 2007 20:24 | #94 Why is this thread getting so much attention? Just wondering?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
col4bin Goldmember 2,264 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | Jun 14, 2007 20:30 | #95 gooble wrote in post #3379094 Why is this thread getting so much attention? Just wondering? a $4,500 camera has a malfunctioning $1.50 plastic part and people want it replaced. Canon is giving folks a hard time and charging $6.00 to ship a $1.50 piece of plastic. Do you see the irony? Frank
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gooble Goldmember 3,149 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Mesa,AZ More info | Jun 14, 2007 21:18 | #96 col4bin wrote in post #3379121 a $4,500 camera has a malfunctioning $1.50 plastic part and people want it replaced. Canon is giving folks a hard time and charging $6.00 to ship a $1.50 piece of plastic. Do you see the irony? Well, I gathered that but it still seems odd.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 14, 2007 21:20 | #97 gooble wrote in post #3379094 Why is this thread getting so much attention? Just wondering?
Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2007 21:56 | #98 gooble wrote in post #3379094 Why is this thread getting so much attention? Just wondering? It is because we are trying to battle against this thread.. Nikon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Jun 14, 2007 22:12 | #99 gooble wrote in post #3379094 Why is this thread getting so much attention? Just wondering? col4bin wrote in post #3379121 a $4,500 camera has a malfunctioning $1.50 plastic part and people want it replaced. Canon is giving folks a hard time and charging $6.00 to ship a $1.50 piece of plastic. Do you see the irony? gooble wrote in post #3379414 Well, I gathered that but it still seems odd. doesn't seem odd to me that we're pissed off about this. plus a LOT of the posters in this thread have actually had this problem. I bet a lot of posts on threads on lens recommendations are made by people who've never even shot with that particular lens. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Jun 14, 2007 22:13 | #100 kobe629 wrote in post #3378434 I just got my toe caps today..Now I know why they charge me $6.50 for shipping..Look at this hugh box and look at how small the item are..What a waste of money to ship something so small in a large box.. ![]() ![]() HOLY CRAP! that's nuts. apparantly they are trying to help us work on our canon box collection (although I don't know if this really counts)? Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cwphoto Go ahead, make my day 2,167 posts Gallery: 30 photos Likes: 76 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia More info | This was a loaner, but it's obviously already gone missing! IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Jun 15, 2007 02:30 | #102 I didn't get your post at first. Lol, yep, it is missing the cap. Come on Canon, this is a joke. They gave me a so called special phone number to call them, will try Monday or Tuesday when I get back from San Diego. Hell, I am still fighting to get my Fall rebate. I just faxed them another copy a few minutes ago so they have it on their desk first thing in the morning. That, plus they shorted my first rebate by $40. I didn't even notice the shortage, so I have to give them credit for calling ME on that one. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember 4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Jun 15, 2007 07:50 | #103 joegolf68 wrote in post #3380764 Come on Canon, this is a joke. They gave me a so called special phone number to call them, will try Monday or Tuesday when I get back from San Diego. Hell, I am still fighting to get my Fall rebate. I just faxed them another copy a few minutes ago so they have it on their desk first thing in the morning. That, plus they shorted my first rebate by $40. I didn't even notice the shortage, so I have to give them credit for calling ME on that one. And the question about why the thread is popular? Heck, were you in the rebate thread? Lol. I am AMAZED they called you to tell you they shorted you. I (almost) always buy used so I've never qualified for a rebate, but I've heard canon's rebates are just horrendous and often times downright dishonest in how much/often they short people. Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Belmondo Cream of the Crop 42,735 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jul 2003 Location: 92210 More info | I have a solution to the problem, and it only costs $189.00. I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cwphoto Go ahead, make my day 2,167 posts Gallery: 30 photos Likes: 76 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia More info | Jun 26, 2007 19:55 | #105 belmondo wrote in post #3445286 I have a solution to the problem, and it only costs $189.00. Buy the Kirk L Bracket. It partially covers the part in questions, and looks like it will hold it in place. At least I can't remove the cover while the L Bracket is installed. You may all thank me now. ![]() Orf the RRS L-bracket - just to keep things commercially balanced. EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1718 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||