O.K., another newbie question.
If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels? Or would it be a different number?
Thanks for helping!!
focuspocus Member 165 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: London, Ontario Canada More info | Jun 08, 2007 05:41 | #1 O.K., another newbie question. Teresa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jun 08, 2007 09:18 | #2 Interesting question, and reasonable assumption. I can't think why it matters, shoot the grey card then transfer the settings to manual. I tried to find the last grey card I shot but it seems to have gone, it was helpful tho. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ayotnoms Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument 2,988 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Francisco Bay Area More info | Jun 08, 2007 18:52 | #3 focuspocus wrote in post #3341466 If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels? If not 128 for each channel they will be v-e-r-y close to each other. The important thing is that no one channel dominates, hence the color balance. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2007 19:29 | #4 Thanks Tim & Steve! Teresa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jun 09, 2007 02:49 | #5 ayotnoms wrote in post #3345306 I was frankly surprised that there was as much difference as you see here but I think the bottomline is that the colors are balanced. Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average? "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Jun 09, 2007 05:28 | #6 Since Canon cameras tend to slightly underexpose camera-converted jpgs (although there can be variations even between cameras of the same model), the values will usually be around 118 in sRGB and slightly less in AdobeRGB. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Jun 09, 2007 08:25 | #7 The exact value may vary but they should all be the same value for a true gray color. If WB is off even a bit, you will get a color cast and the values for the different channels will then be different. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jun 09, 2007 08:38 | #8 René Damkot wrote in post #3346983 Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average? Can you explain why it would matter for a solid grey card? Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bodog Goldmember 1,306 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Peculiar, MO More info | Jun 09, 2007 09:37 | #9 ayotnoms wrote in post #3345306 I was frankly surprised that there was as much difference as you see here but I think the bottomline is that the colors are balanced. Hosted photo: posted by ayotnoms in ./showthread.php?p=3345306&i=i7459683 forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing Looks like the card is still wrapped in plastic and it is picking up some reflections. That would probably explain the different values you are seeing. JimE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tdodd Goldmember 3,733 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Essex, UK More info | Jun 09, 2007 09:58 | #10 The use of the grey card is to get an accurate exposure for the whole scene in given lighting (possibly difficult) conditions. But the fact is that the metering system should resolve *any* scene to the equivalent of 18% grey whether it is white snow or dark woods. Surely the test could be carried out as easily with a sheet of white paper as for a grey card. The camera metering will still try to render the scene as 18% grey and the exposure time will be shortened. But shouldn't you still end up with the same RGB values for a grey card, white card, dark grey card, etc., as long as you have set colour balance accurately and the card has no colour cast?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ayotnoms Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument 2,988 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Francisco Bay Area More info | René Damkot wrote in post #3346983 Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average? 3 X 3 average: CS3 Bodog wrote in post #3347946 Looks like the card is still wrapped in plastic and it is picking up some reflections. That would probably explain the different values you are seeing. I took the card out of the plastic. The card was leaning against a vase with the lower portion closer to the camera and the shot was taken in uneven, available, indoor light. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jun 09, 2007 16:50 | #12 focuspocus wrote in post #3341466 O.K., another newbie question. If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels? Or would it be a different number? Thanks for helping!! You have not mentioned whether or not you are shooting with a Custom White Balance or just using one of the WB selections, such as daylight, incandescent, etc. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jun 10, 2007 05:49 | #13 tim wrote in post #3347752 Can you explain why it would matter for a solid grey card? Color noise. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jun 10, 2007 05:57 | #14 René Damkot wrote in post #3351883 Color noise. Good point. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2861 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||