Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 Jun 2007 (Friday) 05:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

RGB Values

 
focuspocus
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: London, Ontario Canada
     
Jun 08, 2007 05:41 |  #1

O.K., another newbie question.
If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels? Or would it be a different number?
Thanks for helping!!


Teresa
Canon 300D - 30D
EF 50mm 1.8 EF 28-135mm IS **NEW 85mm 1.8**
Sigma 17-70 Sigma EF500 DG Super Flash
Sekonic 358 meter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 08, 2007 09:18 |  #2

Interesting question, and reasonable assumption. I can't think why it matters, shoot the grey card then transfer the settings to manual. I tried to find the last grey card I shot but it seems to have gone, it was helpful tho.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Jun 08, 2007 18:52 |  #3

focuspocus wrote in post #3341466 (external link)
If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels?

If not 128 for each channel they will be v-e-r-y close to each other. The important thing is that no one channel dominates, hence the color balance.

Here's a 18% card I shot. I opened it in Photoshop and used the Eyedropper tool to check the R-G-B values at 4 different spots on the card. I was frankly surprised that there was as much difference as you see here but I think the bottomline is that the colors are balanced.

Cheers!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
focuspocus
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: London, Ontario Canada
     
Jun 08, 2007 19:29 |  #4

Thanks Tim & Steve!
I am trying to learn exposure by the Zone System and needed a point of reference.


Teresa
Canon 300D - 30D
EF 50mm 1.8 EF 28-135mm IS **NEW 85mm 1.8**
Sigma 17-70 Sigma EF500 DG Super Flash
Sekonic 358 meter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 09, 2007 02:49 |  #5

ayotnoms wrote in post #3345306 (external link)
I was frankly surprised that there was as much difference as you see here but I think the bottomline is that the colors are balanced.

Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jun 09, 2007 05:28 |  #6

Since Canon cameras tend to slightly underexpose camera-converted jpgs (although there can be variations even between cameras of the same model), the values will usually be around 118 in sRGB and slightly less in AdobeRGB.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 09, 2007 08:25 |  #7

The exact value may vary but they should all be the same value for a true gray color. If WB is off even a bit, you will get a color cast and the values for the different channels will then be different.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 09, 2007 08:38 |  #8

René Damkot wrote in post #3346983 (external link)
Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average?

Can you explain why it would matter for a solid grey card?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bodog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,306 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Peculiar, MO
     
Jun 09, 2007 09:37 |  #9

ayotnoms wrote in post #3345306 (external link)
I was frankly surprised that there was as much difference as you see here but I think the bottomline is that the colors are balanced.
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by ayotnoms in
./showthread.php?p=334​5306&i=i7459683
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

Looks like the card is still wrapped in plastic and it is picking up some reflections. That would probably explain the different values you are seeing.


JimE
Color? It's all relative...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
Jun 09, 2007 09:58 |  #10

The use of the grey card is to get an accurate exposure for the whole scene in given lighting (possibly difficult) conditions. But the fact is that the metering system should resolve *any* scene to the equivalent of 18% grey whether it is white snow or dark woods. Surely the test could be carried out as easily with a sheet of white paper as for a grey card. The camera metering will still try to render the scene as 18% grey and the exposure time will be shortened. But shouldn't you still end up with the same RGB values for a grey card, white card, dark grey card, etc., as long as you have set colour balance accurately and the card has no colour cast?

If your colour balance is off then there is no reason at all to assume you will get equal values of RGB, whether 128, 128, 128 or anything else. Surely before you can perform this test meaningfully you have to set manual white balance off the card you are shooting, be it white or grey.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Jun 09, 2007 11:41 as a reply to  @ tdodd's post |  #11

René Damkot wrote in post #3346983 (external link)
Was the eyedropper point sample or 5x5 average?

3 X 3 average: CS3

Bodog wrote in post #3347946 (external link)
Looks like the card is still wrapped in plastic and it is picking up some reflections. That would probably explain the different values you are seeing.

I took the card out of the plastic. The card was leaning against a vase with the lower portion closer to the camera and the shot was taken in uneven, available, indoor light.

Here's a question: how much value variation between channels would it take to consider the colors out of balance? On the example I posted I thought the values were "close enough for government work".


Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jun 09, 2007 16:50 |  #12

focuspocus wrote in post #3341466 (external link)
O.K., another newbie question.
If I were to shoot an 18% grey card and open it in CS2, would the RGB values of that photo be 128 for all three channels? Or would it be a different number?
Thanks for helping!!

You have not mentioned whether or not you are shooting with a Custom White Balance or just using one of the WB selections, such as daylight, incandescent, etc.

If you are shooting with a carefully done Custom White Balance, then the 3 channels should come through at approximately the same number, but that number is likely to be much lower than 128 (due to the fact that most Canon cameras underexpose).

If you are not shooting with a Custom White Balance, then the three channels will be almost any value, because whatever light is illuminating the gray card might be far from white light.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 10, 2007 05:49 |  #13

tim wrote in post #3347752 (external link)
Can you explain why it would matter for a solid grey card?

Color noise.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 10, 2007 05:57 |  #14

René Damkot wrote in post #3351883 (external link)
Color noise.

Good point.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,738 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
RGB Values
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2861 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.