canon shooter wrote in post #3346474
I now have an HP 8250, did a fine job before I had to buy a new computer with Windows Vista. HP can't seem to get the driver/profiles right. Just can get what is on the calibrated monitor (could before Vista).
Anyway I am about to give up on HP (terrible support), and more to an Epson.
I have heard nothing but good things about the R1800 ($500). But now I am starting to hear really good things about the new R1400. And it is a lot cheaper ($316 after rebate). But how do the two printers compare.
Can anyone tell the difference in printed images? What is the difference between the two printers.
Assume the R1400 will have a much better result than my current HP 8250??
The main difference is that the 1800 uses pigment ink and the 1400 uses dye ink. This means that prints from the 1800 will have a much longer life before the colours start to fade. The 1400 prints will probably have a slightly larger gamut (i.e. more vibrant colours). You can get fairly decent life out of dye ink prints, but you will need to use specific types of paper; these prints will take ages to dry properly, and will not be very water resistant. Properly framed, however, such prints would last a good few years. Be wary of claims of, say, 100 years life for dye ink prints - these are generally specified for conditions where the print is kept in a vacuum and complete darkness 